Cargando…

Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students

PURPOSE: To verify the test-retest reliability of the Masking Level Difference in normal hearing female university students. METHODS: Prospective descriptive study with 78 young female adults without hearing complaints, submitted to the compact disc version of the Masking Level Difference by Auditec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frota, Silvana Maria Monte Coelho, Leite Filho, Carlos Alberto, Bruno, Carolina Salomone, Carvalho, Lanna Borges, Riegel, Natalia Almeida, de Souza, Sascha Ariel da Silva Rodrigues, Branco-Barreiro, Fátima Cristina Alves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35019083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207
_version_ 1784872352719306752
author Frota, Silvana Maria Monte Coelho
Leite Filho, Carlos Alberto
Bruno, Carolina Salomone
Carvalho, Lanna Borges
Riegel, Natalia Almeida
de Souza, Sascha Ariel da Silva Rodrigues
Branco-Barreiro, Fátima Cristina Alves
author_facet Frota, Silvana Maria Monte Coelho
Leite Filho, Carlos Alberto
Bruno, Carolina Salomone
Carvalho, Lanna Borges
Riegel, Natalia Almeida
de Souza, Sascha Ariel da Silva Rodrigues
Branco-Barreiro, Fátima Cristina Alves
author_sort Frota, Silvana Maria Monte Coelho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To verify the test-retest reliability of the Masking Level Difference in normal hearing female university students. METHODS: Prospective descriptive study with 78 young female adults without hearing complaints, submitted to the compact disc version of the Masking Level Difference by Auditec of Saint Louis. The threshold was determined by the difference between signal-to-noise ratios at hearing thresholds found in the antiphasic and homophasic conditions. The test was applied by the same examiner in two moments (test and retest) with an interval of seven to 14 days between them. Inferential statistical analysis included comparison of test and retest situations using Student's t test for paired samples, calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient and calculation of 95% confidence intervals for signal-to-noise ratios at hearing thresholds found in the antiphasic and homophasic conditions and for masking level difference. RESULTS: The average signal-to-noise ratio at hearing threshold ​​in the homophasic condition was -12.59 dB and -12.46 dB in the Test and Retest situations, respectively, and -21.54 dB and -21.08 dB in the antiphasic condition. The average value ​​in the final Masking Level Difference result was 8.95 dB in the Test and 8.74 dB in the Retest. Intraclass correlation coefficient values ​​obtained were 0.436, 0.625 and 0.577 for homophasic, antiphasic and Masking Level Difference conditions, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Masking Level Difference showed moderate test-retest reliability in normal hearing adults female university students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9851185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98511852023-02-01 Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students Frota, Silvana Maria Monte Coelho Leite Filho, Carlos Alberto Bruno, Carolina Salomone Carvalho, Lanna Borges Riegel, Natalia Almeida de Souza, Sascha Ariel da Silva Rodrigues Branco-Barreiro, Fátima Cristina Alves Codas Original Article PURPOSE: To verify the test-retest reliability of the Masking Level Difference in normal hearing female university students. METHODS: Prospective descriptive study with 78 young female adults without hearing complaints, submitted to the compact disc version of the Masking Level Difference by Auditec of Saint Louis. The threshold was determined by the difference between signal-to-noise ratios at hearing thresholds found in the antiphasic and homophasic conditions. The test was applied by the same examiner in two moments (test and retest) with an interval of seven to 14 days between them. Inferential statistical analysis included comparison of test and retest situations using Student's t test for paired samples, calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient and calculation of 95% confidence intervals for signal-to-noise ratios at hearing thresholds found in the antiphasic and homophasic conditions and for masking level difference. RESULTS: The average signal-to-noise ratio at hearing threshold ​​in the homophasic condition was -12.59 dB and -12.46 dB in the Test and Retest situations, respectively, and -21.54 dB and -21.08 dB in the antiphasic condition. The average value ​​in the final Masking Level Difference result was 8.95 dB in the Test and 8.74 dB in the Retest. Intraclass correlation coefficient values ​​obtained were 0.436, 0.625 and 0.577 for homophasic, antiphasic and Masking Level Difference conditions, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Masking Level Difference showed moderate test-retest reliability in normal hearing adults female university students. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9851185/ /pubmed/35019083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Frota, Silvana Maria Monte Coelho
Leite Filho, Carlos Alberto
Bruno, Carolina Salomone
Carvalho, Lanna Borges
Riegel, Natalia Almeida
de Souza, Sascha Ariel da Silva Rodrigues
Branco-Barreiro, Fátima Cristina Alves
Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
title Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
title_full Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
title_fullStr Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
title_full_unstemmed Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
title_short Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
title_sort masking level difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35019083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207
work_keys_str_mv AT frotasilvanamariamontecoelho maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents
AT leitefilhocarlosalberto maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents
AT brunocarolinasalomone maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents
AT carvalholannaborges maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents
AT riegelnataliaalmeida maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents
AT desouzasaschaarieldasilvarodrigues maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents
AT brancobarreirofatimacristinaalves maskingleveldifferencetestretestreliabilityassessmentinnormalhearingfemaleuniversitystudents