Cargando…
Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence
PURPOSE: Develop new lists of monosyllables for conducting logoaudiometric tests in Portuguese, perform content validation, considering ear side and education and check the equivalence between the lists. METHODS: Were selected 125 monosyllables with different syllabic structures, which were submitte...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35019086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021057 |
_version_ | 1784872354357182464 |
---|---|
author | Vaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida Costa, Lidiéli Dalla de Moraes, Anaelena Bragança Menegotto, Isabela Hoffmeister Costa, Maristela Julio |
author_facet | Vaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida Costa, Lidiéli Dalla de Moraes, Anaelena Bragança Menegotto, Isabela Hoffmeister Costa, Maristela Julio |
author_sort | Vaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Develop new lists of monosyllables for conducting logoaudiometric tests in Portuguese, perform content validation, considering ear side and education and check the equivalence between the lists. METHODS: Were selected 125 monosyllables with different syllabic structures, which were submitted to the content validation process, which included judgment on familiarity, organization of lists, recording of material and auditory recognition. After content validation, the monosyllable lists were subjected to equivalence research, in order to obtain evidence of reliability for the proposed test instrument. RESULTS: Five lists with 25 monosyllables were elaborated and analyzed for content, of these, four lists were validated. There was no statistically significant difference between the responses obtained in the right and left ears. The education of the subjects did not influence the recognition of words. As for the equivalence search, it was found that two lists were equivalent, one not equivalent, but similar and one list was different from the others, and then excluded. CONCLUSION: Two monosyllable lists were validated for content and considered equivalent, with the same level of difficulty between them, and one list was considered similar, which can be used as training to apply the test on the audiological battery. The validated lists were not influenced by ear and education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9851190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98511902023-02-01 Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence Vaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida Costa, Lidiéli Dalla de Moraes, Anaelena Bragança Menegotto, Isabela Hoffmeister Costa, Maristela Julio Codas Artigo Original PURPOSE: Develop new lists of monosyllables for conducting logoaudiometric tests in Portuguese, perform content validation, considering ear side and education and check the equivalence between the lists. METHODS: Were selected 125 monosyllables with different syllabic structures, which were submitted to the content validation process, which included judgment on familiarity, organization of lists, recording of material and auditory recognition. After content validation, the monosyllable lists were subjected to equivalence research, in order to obtain evidence of reliability for the proposed test instrument. RESULTS: Five lists with 25 monosyllables were elaborated and analyzed for content, of these, four lists were validated. There was no statistically significant difference between the responses obtained in the right and left ears. The education of the subjects did not influence the recognition of words. As for the equivalence search, it was found that two lists were equivalent, one not equivalent, but similar and one list was different from the others, and then excluded. CONCLUSION: Two monosyllable lists were validated for content and considered equivalent, with the same level of difficulty between them, and one list was considered similar, which can be used as training to apply the test on the audiological battery. The validated lists were not influenced by ear and education. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9851190/ /pubmed/35019086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021057 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Artigo Original Vaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida Costa, Lidiéli Dalla de Moraes, Anaelena Bragança Menegotto, Isabela Hoffmeister Costa, Maristela Julio Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
title | Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
title_full | Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
title_fullStr | Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
title_full_unstemmed | Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
title_short | Lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
title_sort | lists of monosyllables for logoaudiometric tests: elaboration, content validation and search for equivalence |
topic | Artigo Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35019086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaucheranavaleriadealmeida listsofmonosyllablesforlogoaudiometrictestselaborationcontentvalidationandsearchforequivalence AT costalidielidalla listsofmonosyllablesforlogoaudiometrictestselaborationcontentvalidationandsearchforequivalence AT demoraesanaelenabraganca listsofmonosyllablesforlogoaudiometrictestselaborationcontentvalidationandsearchforequivalence AT menegottoisabelahoffmeister listsofmonosyllablesforlogoaudiometrictestselaborationcontentvalidationandsearchforequivalence AT costamaristelajulio listsofmonosyllablesforlogoaudiometrictestselaborationcontentvalidationandsearchforequivalence |