Cargando…

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India

PURPOSE: Real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is still considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, due to several limitations, use of RT-qPCR is limited in a resource poor setting like North East India. Rapid antigen detection testing kit has rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majumder, Saikat, Chakrabarti, Ankan, Das, Banti, Sarkar, Apurba, Majumdar, Tapan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.12.016
_version_ 1784872365681803264
author Majumder, Saikat
Chakrabarti, Ankan
Das, Banti
Sarkar, Apurba
Majumdar, Tapan
author_facet Majumder, Saikat
Chakrabarti, Ankan
Das, Banti
Sarkar, Apurba
Majumdar, Tapan
author_sort Majumder, Saikat
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is still considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, due to several limitations, use of RT-qPCR is limited in a resource poor setting like North East India. Rapid antigen detection testing kit has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in India. However, conflicting reports exist regarding the efficacy of the kits for diagnosis of COVID-19. This study aims to highlight the performance of Standard Q COVID-19® Antigen detection kit (SD Biosensor) compared with RT-qPCR in the setup of North East India. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples were collected from consenting patients attending the flu clinic in the period from 1st July to December 31, 2020. Samples were transferred to Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL) for RT-qPCR test. Antigen detection from the patient samples were undertaken using Standard Q ® COVID-19 antigen detection kit (SD Biosensor, Republic of Korea). Data were then analyzed for comparison between RT-qPCR and antigen kit results. RESULTS: During the study period, 189 samples were collected, out of which 119 were positive by RT-qPCR. Out of 119 positive samples, calculated sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen kit was 63% and 100% respectively. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy increases in symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients. Cohen's Kappa coefficient showed a moderate association (0.6) between the kit and RT-qPCR test. The kit performed optimally at a CT value of ≤32.5 for N gene with a predicted sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 93.3%. CONCLUSION: The study shows an overall acceptable sensitivity and specificity of the testing kit, with a better performance in symptomatic patients. The association of the kit result is moderate with the results obtained in RT-qPCR. In this study, the rapid antigen test kit performed optimally at N gene qRT PCR cut off value of ≤32.5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9851292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98512922023-01-20 Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India Majumder, Saikat Chakrabarti, Ankan Das, Banti Sarkar, Apurba Majumdar, Tapan Indian J Med Microbiol Original Research Article PURPOSE: Real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is still considered a gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19. However, due to several limitations, use of RT-qPCR is limited in a resource poor setting like North East India. Rapid antigen detection testing kit has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in India. However, conflicting reports exist regarding the efficacy of the kits for diagnosis of COVID-19. This study aims to highlight the performance of Standard Q COVID-19® Antigen detection kit (SD Biosensor) compared with RT-qPCR in the setup of North East India. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples were collected from consenting patients attending the flu clinic in the period from 1st July to December 31, 2020. Samples were transferred to Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL) for RT-qPCR test. Antigen detection from the patient samples were undertaken using Standard Q ® COVID-19 antigen detection kit (SD Biosensor, Republic of Korea). Data were then analyzed for comparison between RT-qPCR and antigen kit results. RESULTS: During the study period, 189 samples were collected, out of which 119 were positive by RT-qPCR. Out of 119 positive samples, calculated sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen kit was 63% and 100% respectively. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy increases in symptomatic patients as compared to asymptomatic patients. Cohen's Kappa coefficient showed a moderate association (0.6) between the kit and RT-qPCR test. The kit performed optimally at a CT value of ≤32.5 for N gene with a predicted sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 93.3%. CONCLUSION: The study shows an overall acceptable sensitivity and specificity of the testing kit, with a better performance in symptomatic patients. The association of the kit result is moderate with the results obtained in RT-qPCR. In this study, the rapid antigen test kit performed optimally at N gene qRT PCR cut off value of ≤32.5. Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2023 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9851292/ /pubmed/36967208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.12.016 Text en © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Majumder, Saikat
Chakrabarti, Ankan
Das, Banti
Sarkar, Apurba
Majumdar, Tapan
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India
title Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India
title_full Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India
title_fullStr Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India
title_short Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with RT-qPCR in a tertiary care setup in North Eastern India
title_sort comparison of sars-cov-2 diagnosis by rapid antigen detection kit with rt-qpcr in a tertiary care setup in north eastern india
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36967208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.12.016
work_keys_str_mv AT majumdersaikat comparisonofsarscov2diagnosisbyrapidantigendetectionkitwithrtqpcrinatertiarycaresetupinnortheasternindia
AT chakrabartiankan comparisonofsarscov2diagnosisbyrapidantigendetectionkitwithrtqpcrinatertiarycaresetupinnortheasternindia
AT dasbanti comparisonofsarscov2diagnosisbyrapidantigendetectionkitwithrtqpcrinatertiarycaresetupinnortheasternindia
AT sarkarapurba comparisonofsarscov2diagnosisbyrapidantigendetectionkitwithrtqpcrinatertiarycaresetupinnortheasternindia
AT majumdartapan comparisonofsarscov2diagnosisbyrapidantigendetectionkitwithrtqpcrinatertiarycaresetupinnortheasternindia