Cargando…
Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns play an essential role in the decision‐making process about revascularization. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) quantifies CAD patterns as either focal or diffuse based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. The objective of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026960 |
_version_ | 1784872400685367296 |
---|---|
author | Mizukami, Takuya Sonck, Jeroen Sakai, Koshiro Ko, Brian Maeng, Michael Otake, Hiromasa Koo, Bon‐Kwon Nagumo, Sakura Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Leipsic, Jonathon Shinke, Toshiro Munhoz, Daniel Mileva, Niya Belmonte, Marta Ohashi, Hirofumi Barbato, Emanuele Johnson, Nils P. De Bruyne, Bernard Collet, Carlos |
author_facet | Mizukami, Takuya Sonck, Jeroen Sakai, Koshiro Ko, Brian Maeng, Michael Otake, Hiromasa Koo, Bon‐Kwon Nagumo, Sakura Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Leipsic, Jonathon Shinke, Toshiro Munhoz, Daniel Mileva, Niya Belmonte, Marta Ohashi, Hirofumi Barbato, Emanuele Johnson, Nils P. De Bruyne, Bernard Collet, Carlos |
author_sort | Mizukami, Takuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns play an essential role in the decision‐making process about revascularization. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) quantifies CAD patterns as either focal or diffuse based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD patterns on acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results considered surrogates of clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, multicenter study of patients with hemodynamically significant CAD undergoing PCI. Motorized FFR pullbacks and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before and after PCI. Post‐PCI FFR >0.90 was considered an optimal result. Focal disease was defined as PPG >0.73 (highest PPG tertile). Overall, 113 patients (116 vessels) were included. Patients with focal disease were younger than those with diffuse CAD (61.4±9.9 versus 65.1±8.7 years, P=0.042). PCI in vessels with high PPG (focal CAD) resulted in higher post‐PCI FFR (0.91±0.07 in the focal group versus 0.86±0.05 in the diffuse group, P<0.001) and larger minimal stent area (6.3±2.3 mm(2) in focal versus 5.3±1.8 mm(2) in diffuse CAD, P=0.015) compared withvessels with low PPG (diffuse CAD). The PPG was associated with the change in FFR after PCI (R (2)=0.51, P<0.001). The PPG significantly improved the capacity to predict optimal PCI results compared with an angiographic assessment of CAD patterns (area under the curve(PPG) 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73–0.88] versus area under the curve(angio) 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42–0.60]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCI in vessels with focal disease defined by the PPG resulted in greater improvement in epicardial conductance and larger minimal stent area compared with diffuse disease. PPG, but not angiographically defined CAD patterns, distinguished patients attaining superior procedural outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03782688 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9851458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98514582023-01-24 Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease Mizukami, Takuya Sonck, Jeroen Sakai, Koshiro Ko, Brian Maeng, Michael Otake, Hiromasa Koo, Bon‐Kwon Nagumo, Sakura Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Leipsic, Jonathon Shinke, Toshiro Munhoz, Daniel Mileva, Niya Belmonte, Marta Ohashi, Hirofumi Barbato, Emanuele Johnson, Nils P. De Bruyne, Bernard Collet, Carlos J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns play an essential role in the decision‐making process about revascularization. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) quantifies CAD patterns as either focal or diffuse based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD patterns on acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results considered surrogates of clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, multicenter study of patients with hemodynamically significant CAD undergoing PCI. Motorized FFR pullbacks and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before and after PCI. Post‐PCI FFR >0.90 was considered an optimal result. Focal disease was defined as PPG >0.73 (highest PPG tertile). Overall, 113 patients (116 vessels) were included. Patients with focal disease were younger than those with diffuse CAD (61.4±9.9 versus 65.1±8.7 years, P=0.042). PCI in vessels with high PPG (focal CAD) resulted in higher post‐PCI FFR (0.91±0.07 in the focal group versus 0.86±0.05 in the diffuse group, P<0.001) and larger minimal stent area (6.3±2.3 mm(2) in focal versus 5.3±1.8 mm(2) in diffuse CAD, P=0.015) compared withvessels with low PPG (diffuse CAD). The PPG was associated with the change in FFR after PCI (R (2)=0.51, P<0.001). The PPG significantly improved the capacity to predict optimal PCI results compared with an angiographic assessment of CAD patterns (area under the curve(PPG) 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73–0.88] versus area under the curve(angio) 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42–0.60]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCI in vessels with focal disease defined by the PPG resulted in greater improvement in epicardial conductance and larger minimal stent area compared with diffuse disease. PPG, but not angiographically defined CAD patterns, distinguished patients attaining superior procedural outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03782688 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9851458/ /pubmed/36444858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026960 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mizukami, Takuya Sonck, Jeroen Sakai, Koshiro Ko, Brian Maeng, Michael Otake, Hiromasa Koo, Bon‐Kwon Nagumo, Sakura Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Leipsic, Jonathon Shinke, Toshiro Munhoz, Daniel Mileva, Niya Belmonte, Marta Ohashi, Hirofumi Barbato, Emanuele Johnson, Nils P. De Bruyne, Bernard Collet, Carlos Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease |
title | Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease |
title_full | Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease |
title_fullStr | Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease |
title_short | Procedural Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease |
title_sort | procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in focal and diffuse coronary artery disease |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36444858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mizukamitakuya proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT sonckjeroen proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT sakaikoshiro proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT kobrian proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT maengmichael proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT otakehiromasa proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT koobonkwon proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT nagumosakura proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT nørgaardbjarnel proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT leipsicjonathon proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT shinketoshiro proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT munhozdaniel proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT milevaniya proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT belmontemarta proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT ohashihirofumi proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT barbatoemanuele proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT johnsonnilsp proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT debruynebernard proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease AT colletcarlos proceduraloutcomesafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsinfocalanddiffusecoronaryarterydisease |