Cargando…

Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop

Health scholars have been enthusiastic in critique of health inequities, but comparatively silent on the ways in which our own institutions, and our actions within them, recreate and retrench systems of oppression. The behaviour of health scholars within academic institutions have far reaching influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shahram, Sana Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01763-9
_version_ 1784872432961585152
author Shahram, Sana Z.
author_facet Shahram, Sana Z.
author_sort Shahram, Sana Z.
collection PubMed
description Health scholars have been enthusiastic in critique of health inequities, but comparatively silent on the ways in which our own institutions, and our actions within them, recreate and retrench systems of oppression. The behaviour of health scholars within academic institutions have far reaching influences on the health-related workforce, the nature of evidence, and the policy solutions within our collective imaginations. Progress on health equity requires moving beyond platitudes like ‘equity, diversity and inclusion’ statements and trainings towards actually being and doing differently within our day-to-day practices. Applying complex systems change theory to identify, examine and shift mental models, or habits of thought (and action), that are keeping us stuck in our efforts to advance health equity is a promising approach. This paper introduces five common mental models that are preventing meaningful equity-oriented systems transformation within academia and offers ideas for shifting them towards progressively more productive, and authentic, actions by health scholars to advance health equity across systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9851581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98515812023-01-20 Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop Shahram, Sana Z. Int J Equity Health Comment Health scholars have been enthusiastic in critique of health inequities, but comparatively silent on the ways in which our own institutions, and our actions within them, recreate and retrench systems of oppression. The behaviour of health scholars within academic institutions have far reaching influences on the health-related workforce, the nature of evidence, and the policy solutions within our collective imaginations. Progress on health equity requires moving beyond platitudes like ‘equity, diversity and inclusion’ statements and trainings towards actually being and doing differently within our day-to-day practices. Applying complex systems change theory to identify, examine and shift mental models, or habits of thought (and action), that are keeping us stuck in our efforts to advance health equity is a promising approach. This paper introduces five common mental models that are preventing meaningful equity-oriented systems transformation within academia and offers ideas for shifting them towards progressively more productive, and authentic, actions by health scholars to advance health equity across systems. BioMed Central 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9851581/ /pubmed/36658523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01763-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Comment
Shahram, Sana Z.
Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
title Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
title_full Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
title_fullStr Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
title_full_unstemmed Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
title_short Five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
title_sort five ways ‘health scholars’ are complicit in upholding health inequities, and how to stop
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01763-9
work_keys_str_mv AT shahramsanaz fivewayshealthscholarsarecomplicitinupholdinghealthinequitiesandhowtostop