Cargando…
Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses
BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidity require coordinated and patient-centred care. Telemedicine IMPACT Plus provides such care for complex patients in Toronto, Ontario. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing health care utilization and costs at 1-year postintervention for an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36649982 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220006 |
_version_ | 1784872443876212736 |
---|---|
author | Ryan, Bridget L. Mondor, Luke Wodchis, Walter P. Glazier, Richard H. Meredith, Leslie Fortin, Martin Stewart, Moira |
author_facet | Ryan, Bridget L. Mondor, Luke Wodchis, Walter P. Glazier, Richard H. Meredith, Leslie Fortin, Martin Stewart, Moira |
author_sort | Ryan, Bridget L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidity require coordinated and patient-centred care. Telemedicine IMPACT Plus provides such care for complex patients in Toronto, Ontario. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing health care utilization and costs at 1-year postintervention for an intervention group and 2 control groups (RCT and propensity matched). METHODS: Data for 82 RCT intervention and 74 RCT control participants were linked with health administrative data. We created a second control group using health administrative data–derived propensity scores to match (1:5) intervention participants with comparators. We evaluated 5 outcomes: acute hospital admissions, emergency department visits, costs of all insured health care, 30-day hospital readmissions and 7-day family physician follow-up after hospital discharge using generalized linear models for RCT controls and generalized estimating equations for propensity-matched controls. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between intervention participants and either control group. For hospital admissions, emergency department visits, costs and readmissions, the relative differences ranged from 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–2.60) to 1.67 (95% CI 0.82–3.38) with intervention costs at about Can$20 000, RCT controls costs at around Can$15 000 and propensity controls costs at around Can$17 000. There was a higher rate of follow-up with a family physician for the intervention participants compared with the RCT controls (53.13 v. 21.43 per 100 hospital discharges; relative difference 2.48 [95% CI 0.98–6.29]) and propensity-matched controls (49.94 v. 28.21 per 100 hospital discharges; relative difference 1.81 [95% CI 0.99–3.30]). INTERPRETATION: Despite a complex patient-centred intervention, there was no significant improvement in health care utilization or cost. Future research requires larger sample sizes and should include outcomes important to patients and the health care system, and longer follow-up periods. ONTARIO CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: 104191 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9851625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98516252023-01-20 Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses Ryan, Bridget L. Mondor, Luke Wodchis, Walter P. Glazier, Richard H. Meredith, Leslie Fortin, Martin Stewart, Moira CMAJ Open Research BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidity require coordinated and patient-centred care. Telemedicine IMPACT Plus provides such care for complex patients in Toronto, Ontario. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing health care utilization and costs at 1-year postintervention for an intervention group and 2 control groups (RCT and propensity matched). METHODS: Data for 82 RCT intervention and 74 RCT control participants were linked with health administrative data. We created a second control group using health administrative data–derived propensity scores to match (1:5) intervention participants with comparators. We evaluated 5 outcomes: acute hospital admissions, emergency department visits, costs of all insured health care, 30-day hospital readmissions and 7-day family physician follow-up after hospital discharge using generalized linear models for RCT controls and generalized estimating equations for propensity-matched controls. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between intervention participants and either control group. For hospital admissions, emergency department visits, costs and readmissions, the relative differences ranged from 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–2.60) to 1.67 (95% CI 0.82–3.38) with intervention costs at about Can$20 000, RCT controls costs at around Can$15 000 and propensity controls costs at around Can$17 000. There was a higher rate of follow-up with a family physician for the intervention participants compared with the RCT controls (53.13 v. 21.43 per 100 hospital discharges; relative difference 2.48 [95% CI 0.98–6.29]) and propensity-matched controls (49.94 v. 28.21 per 100 hospital discharges; relative difference 1.81 [95% CI 0.99–3.30]). INTERPRETATION: Despite a complex patient-centred intervention, there was no significant improvement in health care utilization or cost. Future research requires larger sample sizes and should include outcomes important to patients and the health care system, and longer follow-up periods. ONTARIO CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: 104191 CMA Impact Inc. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9851625/ /pubmed/36649982 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220006 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use) and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Ryan, Bridget L. Mondor, Luke Wodchis, Walter P. Glazier, Richard H. Meredith, Leslie Fortin, Martin Stewart, Moira Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
title | Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
title_full | Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
title_fullStr | Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
title_short | Effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in Ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
title_sort | effect of a multimorbidity intervention on health care utilization and costs in ontario: randomized controlled trial and propensity-matched analyses |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36649982 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryanbridgetl effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses AT mondorluke effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses AT wodchiswalterp effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses AT glazierrichardh effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses AT meredithleslie effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses AT fortinmartin effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses AT stewartmoira effectofamultimorbidityinterventiononhealthcareutilizationandcostsinontariorandomizedcontrolledtrialandpropensitymatchedanalyses |