Cargando…

Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia

BACKGROUND: Identifying optimal COVID-19 policies is challenging. For Victoria, Australia (6.6 million people), we evaluated 104 policy packages (two levels of stringency of public health and social measures [PHSMs], by two levels each of mask-wearing and respirator provision during large outbreaks,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szanyi, Joshua, Wilson, Tim, Howe, Samantha, Zeng, Jessie, Andrabi, Hassan, Rossiter, Shania, Blakely, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100675
_version_ 1784872494771994624
author Szanyi, Joshua
Wilson, Tim
Howe, Samantha
Zeng, Jessie
Andrabi, Hassan
Rossiter, Shania
Blakely, Tony
author_facet Szanyi, Joshua
Wilson, Tim
Howe, Samantha
Zeng, Jessie
Andrabi, Hassan
Rossiter, Shania
Blakely, Tony
author_sort Szanyi, Joshua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying optimal COVID-19 policies is challenging. For Victoria, Australia (6.6 million people), we evaluated 104 policy packages (two levels of stringency of public health and social measures [PHSMs], by two levels each of mask-wearing and respirator provision during large outbreaks, by 13 vaccination schedules) for nine future SARS-CoV-2 variant scenarios. METHODS: We used an agent-based model to estimate morbidity, mortality, and costs over 12 months from October 2022 for each scenario. The 104 policies (each averaged over the nine future variant scenarios) were ranked based on four evenly weighted criteria: cost-effectiveness from (a) health system only and (b) health system plus GDP perspectives, (c) deaths and (d) days exceeding hospital occupancy thresholds. FINDINGS: More compared to less stringent PHSMs reduced cumulative infections, hospitalisations and deaths but also increased time in stage ≥3 PHSMs. Any further vaccination from October 2022 decreased hospitalisations and deaths by 12% and 27% respectively compared to no further vaccination and was usually a cost-saving intervention from a health expenditure plus GDP perspective. High versus low vaccine coverage decreased deaths by 15% and reduced time in stage ≥3 PHSMs by 20%. The modelled mask policies had modest impacts on morbidity, mortality, and health system pressure. The highest-ranking policy combination was more stringent PHSMs, two further vaccine doses (an Omicron-targeted vaccine followed by a multivalent vaccine) for ≥30-year-olds with high uptake, and promotion of increased mask wearing (but not Government provision of respirators). INTERPRETATION: Ongoing vaccination and PHSMs continue to be key components of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Integrated epidemiologic and economic modelling, as exemplified in this paper, can be rapidly updated and used in pandemic decision making. FUNDING: Anonymous donation, 10.13039/501100001782University of Melbourne funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9851841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98518412023-01-20 Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia Szanyi, Joshua Wilson, Tim Howe, Samantha Zeng, Jessie Andrabi, Hassan Rossiter, Shania Blakely, Tony Lancet Reg Health West Pac Articles BACKGROUND: Identifying optimal COVID-19 policies is challenging. For Victoria, Australia (6.6 million people), we evaluated 104 policy packages (two levels of stringency of public health and social measures [PHSMs], by two levels each of mask-wearing and respirator provision during large outbreaks, by 13 vaccination schedules) for nine future SARS-CoV-2 variant scenarios. METHODS: We used an agent-based model to estimate morbidity, mortality, and costs over 12 months from October 2022 for each scenario. The 104 policies (each averaged over the nine future variant scenarios) were ranked based on four evenly weighted criteria: cost-effectiveness from (a) health system only and (b) health system plus GDP perspectives, (c) deaths and (d) days exceeding hospital occupancy thresholds. FINDINGS: More compared to less stringent PHSMs reduced cumulative infections, hospitalisations and deaths but also increased time in stage ≥3 PHSMs. Any further vaccination from October 2022 decreased hospitalisations and deaths by 12% and 27% respectively compared to no further vaccination and was usually a cost-saving intervention from a health expenditure plus GDP perspective. High versus low vaccine coverage decreased deaths by 15% and reduced time in stage ≥3 PHSMs by 20%. The modelled mask policies had modest impacts on morbidity, mortality, and health system pressure. The highest-ranking policy combination was more stringent PHSMs, two further vaccine doses (an Omicron-targeted vaccine followed by a multivalent vaccine) for ≥30-year-olds with high uptake, and promotion of increased mask wearing (but not Government provision of respirators). INTERPRETATION: Ongoing vaccination and PHSMs continue to be key components of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Integrated epidemiologic and economic modelling, as exemplified in this paper, can be rapidly updated and used in pandemic decision making. FUNDING: Anonymous donation, 10.13039/501100001782University of Melbourne funding. Elsevier 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9851841/ /pubmed/36694478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100675 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Szanyi, Joshua
Wilson, Tim
Howe, Samantha
Zeng, Jessie
Andrabi, Hassan
Rossiter, Shania
Blakely, Tony
Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia
title Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia
title_full Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia
title_fullStr Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia
title_short Epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal COVID-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in Victoria, Australia
title_sort epidemiologic and economic modelling of optimal covid-19 policy: public health and social measures, masks and vaccines in victoria, australia
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36694478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100675
work_keys_str_mv AT szanyijoshua epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia
AT wilsontim epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia
AT howesamantha epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia
AT zengjessie epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia
AT andrabihassan epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia
AT rossitershania epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia
AT blakelytony epidemiologicandeconomicmodellingofoptimalcovid19policypublichealthandsocialmeasuresmasksandvaccinesinvictoriaaustralia