Cargando…

Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrasekar, Shyam, Dwibedi, Bhagirathi, Das, Rashmi Ranjan, Padhy, Biswa Mohan, Behera, Bikram Kishore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0
_version_ 1784872511483150336
author Chandrasekar, Shyam
Dwibedi, Bhagirathi
Das, Rashmi Ranjan
Padhy, Biswa Mohan
Behera, Bikram Kishore
author_facet Chandrasekar, Shyam
Dwibedi, Bhagirathi
Das, Rashmi Ranjan
Padhy, Biswa Mohan
Behera, Bikram Kishore
author_sort Chandrasekar, Shyam
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18-month period. Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled. Rate of successful/adequate sedation was assessed using the Paediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS). The primary outcome was the efficacy (successful sedation or sedation rate) of the three drugs. One-hundred and ninety-five children were included for the MRI procedure. IND was found to be superior in terms of achieving successful sedation. INM had a shorter onset and duration of sedation compared to IND and TRI, but with an increased failure rate (88.3%). Keeping INM as the reference group, it was found that the odds of sedation increased 4.1 times on changing from INM to IND (p < 0.01), and 2.26 times on changing from INM to TRI (p < 0.01). Adverse events included nasal discomfort (18.3%) in INM group; and self-limited tachycardia (4.6%) and hypotension (10.8%) in the IND group. Conclusion: IND was more efficacious than INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI without any significant adverse events. Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017257; date registered: 25/01/2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9851899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98518992023-01-20 Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial Chandrasekar, Shyam Dwibedi, Bhagirathi Das, Rashmi Ranjan Padhy, Biswa Mohan Behera, Bikram Kishore Eur J Pediatr Research The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18-month period. Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled. Rate of successful/adequate sedation was assessed using the Paediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS). The primary outcome was the efficacy (successful sedation or sedation rate) of the three drugs. One-hundred and ninety-five children were included for the MRI procedure. IND was found to be superior in terms of achieving successful sedation. INM had a shorter onset and duration of sedation compared to IND and TRI, but with an increased failure rate (88.3%). Keeping INM as the reference group, it was found that the odds of sedation increased 4.1 times on changing from INM to IND (p < 0.01), and 2.26 times on changing from INM to TRI (p < 0.01). Adverse events included nasal discomfort (18.3%) in INM group; and self-limited tachycardia (4.6%) and hypotension (10.8%) in the IND group. Conclusion: IND was more efficacious than INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI without any significant adverse events. Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017257; date registered: 25/01/2019. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9851899/ /pubmed/36658444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research
Chandrasekar, Shyam
Dwibedi, Bhagirathi
Das, Rashmi Ranjan
Padhy, Biswa Mohan
Behera, Bikram Kishore
Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
title Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
title_full Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
title_fullStr Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
title_short Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
title_sort comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (mri): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9851899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekarshyam comparisonoforaltriclofosandintranasalmidazolamanddexmedetomidineforsedationinchildrenundergoingmagneticresonanceimagingmrianopenlabelthreearmrandomizedtrial
AT dwibedibhagirathi comparisonoforaltriclofosandintranasalmidazolamanddexmedetomidineforsedationinchildrenundergoingmagneticresonanceimagingmrianopenlabelthreearmrandomizedtrial
AT dasrashmiranjan comparisonoforaltriclofosandintranasalmidazolamanddexmedetomidineforsedationinchildrenundergoingmagneticresonanceimagingmrianopenlabelthreearmrandomizedtrial
AT padhybiswamohan comparisonoforaltriclofosandintranasalmidazolamanddexmedetomidineforsedationinchildrenundergoingmagneticresonanceimagingmrianopenlabelthreearmrandomizedtrial
AT beherabikramkishore comparisonoforaltriclofosandintranasalmidazolamanddexmedetomidineforsedationinchildrenundergoingmagneticresonanceimagingmrianopenlabelthreearmrandomizedtrial