Cargando…

A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter

Smartphones may provide a highly available access to simplified hypertension screening in environments with limited health care resources. Most studies involving smartphone blood pressure (BP) apps have focused on validation in static conditions without taking into account intraindividual BP variati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmann, G., Proença, M., Degott, J., Bonnier, G., Lemkaddem, A., Lemay, M., Schorer, R., Christen, U., Knebel, J.-F., Schoettker, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00886-2
_version_ 1784872559803629568
author Hofmann, G.
Proença, M.
Degott, J.
Bonnier, G.
Lemkaddem, A.
Lemay, M.
Schorer, R.
Christen, U.
Knebel, J.-F.
Schoettker, P.
author_facet Hofmann, G.
Proença, M.
Degott, J.
Bonnier, G.
Lemkaddem, A.
Lemay, M.
Schorer, R.
Christen, U.
Knebel, J.-F.
Schoettker, P.
author_sort Hofmann, G.
collection PubMed
description Smartphones may provide a highly available access to simplified hypertension screening in environments with limited health care resources. Most studies involving smartphone blood pressure (BP) apps have focused on validation in static conditions without taking into account intraindividual BP variations. We report here the first experimental evidence of smartphone-derived BP estimation compared to an arterial catheter in a highly dynamic context such as induction of general anesthesia. We tested a smartphone app (OptiBP) on 121 patients requiring general anesthesia and invasive BP monitoring. For each patient, ten 1-min segments aligned in time with ten smartphone recordings were extracted from the continuous invasive BP. A total of 1152 recordings from 119 patients were analyzed. After exclusion of 2 subjects and rejection of 565 recordings due to BP estimation not generated by the app, we retained 565 recordings from 109 patients (acceptance rate 51.1%). Concordance rate (CR) and angular CR demonstrated values of more than 90% for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean (MBP) BP. Error grid analysis showed that 98% of measurement pairs were in no- or low-risk zones for SBP and MBP, of which more than 89% in the no-risk zone. Evaluation of accuracy and precision [bias ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement)] between the app and the invasive BP was 0.0 ± 7.5 mmHg [− 14.9, 14.8], 0.1 ± 2.9 mmHg [− 5.5, 5.7], and 0.1 ± 4.2 mmHg [− 8.3, 8.4] for SBP, DBP and MBP respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a smartphone app was compared to an invasive BP reference. Its trending ability was investigated in highly dynamic conditions, demonstrating high concordance and accuracy. Our study could lead the way for mobile devices to leverage the measurement of BP and management of hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98521902023-01-21 A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter Hofmann, G. Proença, M. Degott, J. Bonnier, G. Lemkaddem, A. Lemay, M. Schorer, R. Christen, U. Knebel, J.-F. Schoettker, P. J Clin Monit Comput Original Research Smartphones may provide a highly available access to simplified hypertension screening in environments with limited health care resources. Most studies involving smartphone blood pressure (BP) apps have focused on validation in static conditions without taking into account intraindividual BP variations. We report here the first experimental evidence of smartphone-derived BP estimation compared to an arterial catheter in a highly dynamic context such as induction of general anesthesia. We tested a smartphone app (OptiBP) on 121 patients requiring general anesthesia and invasive BP monitoring. For each patient, ten 1-min segments aligned in time with ten smartphone recordings were extracted from the continuous invasive BP. A total of 1152 recordings from 119 patients were analyzed. After exclusion of 2 subjects and rejection of 565 recordings due to BP estimation not generated by the app, we retained 565 recordings from 109 patients (acceptance rate 51.1%). Concordance rate (CR) and angular CR demonstrated values of more than 90% for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean (MBP) BP. Error grid analysis showed that 98% of measurement pairs were in no- or low-risk zones for SBP and MBP, of which more than 89% in the no-risk zone. Evaluation of accuracy and precision [bias ± standard deviation (95% limits of agreement)] between the app and the invasive BP was 0.0 ± 7.5 mmHg [− 14.9, 14.8], 0.1 ± 2.9 mmHg [− 5.5, 5.7], and 0.1 ± 4.2 mmHg [− 8.3, 8.4] for SBP, DBP and MBP respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a smartphone app was compared to an invasive BP reference. Its trending ability was investigated in highly dynamic conditions, demonstrating high concordance and accuracy. Our study could lead the way for mobile devices to leverage the measurement of BP and management of hypertension. Springer Netherlands 2022-06-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9852190/ /pubmed/35727426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00886-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Hofmann, G.
Proença, M.
Degott, J.
Bonnier, G.
Lemkaddem, A.
Lemay, M.
Schorer, R.
Christen, U.
Knebel, J.-F.
Schoettker, P.
A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
title A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
title_full A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
title_fullStr A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
title_full_unstemmed A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
title_short A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
title_sort novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35727426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00886-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmanng anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT proencam anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT degottj anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT bonnierg anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT lemkaddema anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT lemaym anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT schorerr anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT christenu anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT knebeljf anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT schoettkerp anovelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT hofmanng novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT proencam novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT degottj novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT bonnierg novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT lemkaddema novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT lemaym novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT schorerr novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT christenu novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT knebeljf novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter
AT schoettkerp novelsmartphoneappforbloodpressuremeasurementaproofofconceptstudyagainstanarterialcatheter