Cargando…

Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?

Esophagectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Traditionally, it is performed through a laparotomy and a thoracotomy, and is associated with high rates of postoperative complications and mortality. The advent of robotic surgery has represented a technological e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebecchi, Fabrizio, Ugliono, Elettra, Allaix, Marco Ettore, Morino, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01351-0
_version_ 1784872563786121216
author Rebecchi, Fabrizio
Ugliono, Elettra
Allaix, Marco Ettore
Morino, Mario
author_facet Rebecchi, Fabrizio
Ugliono, Elettra
Allaix, Marco Ettore
Morino, Mario
author_sort Rebecchi, Fabrizio
collection PubMed
description Esophagectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Traditionally, it is performed through a laparotomy and a thoracotomy, and is associated with high rates of postoperative complications and mortality. The advent of robotic surgery has represented a technological evolution in the field of esophageal cancer treatment. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been progressively widely adopted following the first reports on the safety and feasibility of this procedure in 2004. The robotic approach has better short-term postoperative outcomes than open esophagectomy, without jeopardizing oncologic radicality. The results of the comparison between RAMIE and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are less conclusive. This article will focus on the role of RAMIE in the current clinical scenario with particular attention to its possible benefits and perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98522042023-01-21 Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery? Rebecchi, Fabrizio Ugliono, Elettra Allaix, Marco Ettore Morino, Mario Updates Surg Review Article Esophagectomy is the gold standard for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. Traditionally, it is performed through a laparotomy and a thoracotomy, and is associated with high rates of postoperative complications and mortality. The advent of robotic surgery has represented a technological evolution in the field of esophageal cancer treatment. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) has been progressively widely adopted following the first reports on the safety and feasibility of this procedure in 2004. The robotic approach has better short-term postoperative outcomes than open esophagectomy, without jeopardizing oncologic radicality. The results of the comparison between RAMIE and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are less conclusive. This article will focus on the role of RAMIE in the current clinical scenario with particular attention to its possible benefits and perspectives. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9852204/ /pubmed/35953621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01351-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Rebecchi, Fabrizio
Ugliono, Elettra
Allaix, Marco Ettore
Morino, Mario
Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
title Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
title_full Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
title_fullStr Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
title_short Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
title_sort why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01351-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rebecchifabrizio whypaymoreforrobotinesophagealcancersurgery
AT uglionoelettra whypaymoreforrobotinesophagealcancersurgery
AT allaixmarcoettore whypaymoreforrobotinesophagealcancersurgery
AT morinomario whypaymoreforrobotinesophagealcancersurgery