Cargando…
Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states
This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and geographical distribution of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Mexico, including owned dogs from veterinary clinics with regular medical care and shelter dogs. The Mexican territory was divided...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100112 |
_version_ | 1784872582146686976 |
---|---|
author | Bedoya, Felipe Beugnet, Frederic Tobias, Emilia Garcia-Mendizabal, Erick Hay-Parker, Samantha Montes, Nancy Uribe, Jose Mondaca, Enrique |
author_facet | Bedoya, Felipe Beugnet, Frederic Tobias, Emilia Garcia-Mendizabal, Erick Hay-Parker, Samantha Montes, Nancy Uribe, Jose Mondaca, Enrique |
author_sort | Bedoya, Felipe |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and geographical distribution of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Mexico, including owned dogs from veterinary clinics with regular medical care and shelter dogs. The Mexican territory was divided into eight geographical regions; 22 out of 32 states were included; 110 veterinary clinics and 53 dog shelters participated. SNAP® 4Dx Plus® (IDEXX® Laboratories) was used to detect antibodies against Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigens. A total of 3522 apparently healthy dogs were tested, 1648 from clinics and 1874 from shelters. The highest seroprevalence of infection/exposure was found for Ehrlichia spp. (30.9%), followed by Anaplasma spp. (14.6%), D. immitis (5.3%) and B. burgdorferi (0.1%). Significantly more positive dogs were older than 3 years. Regarding differences between facility types, there were only differences for D. immitis which was more prevalent in clinics than in shelters (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.45–2.69; P < 0.0001). Co-infections were detected in 38.4% of the positive samples. Dogs from Mexican states located on the Atlantic and the Pacific coast were significantly more at risk for Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. infections than dogs from interior states. Dogs in Atlantic coastal states were more at risk for Dirofilaria immitis infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9852277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98522772023-01-21 Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states Bedoya, Felipe Beugnet, Frederic Tobias, Emilia Garcia-Mendizabal, Erick Hay-Parker, Samantha Montes, Nancy Uribe, Jose Mondaca, Enrique Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis Research Article This study aimed to determine the seroprevalence and geographical distribution of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Mexico, including owned dogs from veterinary clinics with regular medical care and shelter dogs. The Mexican territory was divided into eight geographical regions; 22 out of 32 states were included; 110 veterinary clinics and 53 dog shelters participated. SNAP® 4Dx Plus® (IDEXX® Laboratories) was used to detect antibodies against Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis antigens. A total of 3522 apparently healthy dogs were tested, 1648 from clinics and 1874 from shelters. The highest seroprevalence of infection/exposure was found for Ehrlichia spp. (30.9%), followed by Anaplasma spp. (14.6%), D. immitis (5.3%) and B. burgdorferi (0.1%). Significantly more positive dogs were older than 3 years. Regarding differences between facility types, there were only differences for D. immitis which was more prevalent in clinics than in shelters (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.45–2.69; P < 0.0001). Co-infections were detected in 38.4% of the positive samples. Dogs from Mexican states located on the Atlantic and the Pacific coast were significantly more at risk for Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. infections than dogs from interior states. Dogs in Atlantic coastal states were more at risk for Dirofilaria immitis infection. Elsevier 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9852277/ /pubmed/36687783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100112 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bedoya, Felipe Beugnet, Frederic Tobias, Emilia Garcia-Mendizabal, Erick Hay-Parker, Samantha Montes, Nancy Uribe, Jose Mondaca, Enrique Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states |
title | Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states |
title_full | Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states |
title_fullStr | Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states |
title_full_unstemmed | Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states |
title_short | Geographical analysis of seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different Mexican states |
title_sort | geographical analysis of seroprevalence of ehrlichia spp., anaplasma spp., borrelia burgdorferi and dirofilaria immitis, in clinics and dog shelters in different mexican states |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bedoyafelipe geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT beugnetfrederic geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT tobiasemilia geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT garciamendizabalerick geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT hayparkersamantha geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT montesnancy geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT uribejose geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates AT mondacaenrique geographicalanalysisofseroprevalenceofehrlichiasppanaplasmasppborreliaburgdorferianddirofilariaimmitisinclinicsanddogsheltersindifferentmexicanstates |