Cargando…
Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the most preferred nephron-sparing treatments for clinical T1 (cT1) renal cancer, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually used for patients who are poor surgical candidates. The long-term oncologic outcome of RFA vs. PN for cT1 renal cancer remai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012897 |
_version_ | 1784872604385935360 |
---|---|
author | Li, Linjin Zhu, Jianlong Shao, Huan Huang, Laijian Wang, Xiaoting Bao, Wenshuo Sheng, Tao Chen, Dake He, Yanmei Song, Baolin |
author_facet | Li, Linjin Zhu, Jianlong Shao, Huan Huang, Laijian Wang, Xiaoting Bao, Wenshuo Sheng, Tao Chen, Dake He, Yanmei Song, Baolin |
author_sort | Li, Linjin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the most preferred nephron-sparing treatments for clinical T1 (cT1) renal cancer, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually used for patients who are poor surgical candidates. The long-term oncologic outcome of RFA vs. PN for cT1 renal cancer remains undetermined. This meta-analysis aims to compare the treatment efficacy and safety of RFA and PN for patients with cT1 renal cancer with long-term follow-up of at least 5 years. METHOD: This meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Literature studies that had data on the comparison of the efficacy or safety of RFA vs. PN in treating cT1 renal cancer were searched in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January2000 to 1 May 2022. Only long-term studies with a median or mean follow-up of at least 5 years were included. The following measures of effect were pooled: odds ratio (OR) for recurrence and major complications; hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additional analyses, including sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias analysis, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of seven studies with 1,635 patients were finally included. The treatment efficacy of RFA was not different with PN in terms of cancer recurrence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.45–3.28), PFS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.75–2.11), and CSS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI, 0.41–3.95) as well as major complications (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55–3.14) (P > 0.05 for all). RFA was a potential significant risk factor for OS (HR = 1.76, 95% CI, 1.32–2.34, P < 0.001). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias were observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the long-term oncological outcomes of cT1 renal cancer, and the results suggest that RFA has comparable therapeutic efficacy with PN. RFA is a nephron-sparing technique with favorable oncologic efficacy and safety and a good treatment alternative for cT1 renal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9852310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98523102023-01-21 Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review Li, Linjin Zhu, Jianlong Shao, Huan Huang, Laijian Wang, Xiaoting Bao, Wenshuo Sheng, Tao Chen, Dake He, Yanmei Song, Baolin Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the most preferred nephron-sparing treatments for clinical T1 (cT1) renal cancer, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually used for patients who are poor surgical candidates. The long-term oncologic outcome of RFA vs. PN for cT1 renal cancer remains undetermined. This meta-analysis aims to compare the treatment efficacy and safety of RFA and PN for patients with cT1 renal cancer with long-term follow-up of at least 5 years. METHOD: This meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Literature studies that had data on the comparison of the efficacy or safety of RFA vs. PN in treating cT1 renal cancer were searched in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January2000 to 1 May 2022. Only long-term studies with a median or mean follow-up of at least 5 years were included. The following measures of effect were pooled: odds ratio (OR) for recurrence and major complications; hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additional analyses, including sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias analysis, were also performed. RESULTS: A total of seven studies with 1,635 patients were finally included. The treatment efficacy of RFA was not different with PN in terms of cancer recurrence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.45–3.28), PFS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.75–2.11), and CSS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI, 0.41–3.95) as well as major complications (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55–3.14) (P > 0.05 for all). RFA was a potential significant risk factor for OS (HR = 1.76, 95% CI, 1.32–2.34, P < 0.001). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias were observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the long-term oncological outcomes of cT1 renal cancer, and the results suggest that RFA has comparable therapeutic efficacy with PN. RFA is a nephron-sparing technique with favorable oncologic efficacy and safety and a good treatment alternative for cT1 renal cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9852310/ /pubmed/36684152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012897 Text en © 2023 Li, Zhu, Shao, Huang, Wang, Bao, Sheng, Chen, He and Song. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Li, Linjin Zhu, Jianlong Shao, Huan Huang, Laijian Wang, Xiaoting Bao, Wenshuo Sheng, Tao Chen, Dake He, Yanmei Song, Baolin Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title | Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full | Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_fullStr | Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_short | Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_sort | long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for ct1 renal cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lilinjin longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT zhujianlong longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT shaohuan longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT huanglaijian longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT wangxiaoting longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT baowenshuo longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT shengtao longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT chendake longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT heyanmei longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT songbaolin longtermoutcomesofradiofrequencyablationvspartialnephrectomyforct1renalcancerametaanalysisandsystematicreview |