Cargando…

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons have widely regarded sternotomy (ST) as the standard surgical method for thymectomy. Minimally invasive methods for thymectomy, including video-assisted and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), have been explored. There are some studies have researched and compared the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Cheng-qian, Wang, Jie, Liu, Fei-yu, Wang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1048547
_version_ 1784872611875913728
author Wang, Cheng-qian
Wang, Jie
Liu, Fei-yu
Wang, Wei
author_facet Wang, Cheng-qian
Wang, Jie
Liu, Fei-yu
Wang, Wei
author_sort Wang, Cheng-qian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgeons have widely regarded sternotomy (ST) as the standard surgical method for thymectomy. Minimally invasive methods for thymectomy, including video-assisted and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), have been explored. There are some studies have researched and compared the outcomes of patients after robotic and sternotomy procedure. METHODS: We searched the databases of Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and selected the studies on the efficacy and safety of RATS or ST for thymectomy. Meta-analysis was performed for operation time, operation blood loss, postoperative drainage time, operative complications and hospitalization time. RESULTS: A total of 16 cohort studies with 1,089 patients were included. Compared to ST, RATS is an appropriate alternative for thymectomy which reduced operation blood loss [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −1.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): (−2.64, −0.99), p = 0.000], postoperative drainage time [SMD = −2.47, 95% Cl: (−3.45, −1.48), p = 0.000], operative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.31, 95% Cl: (0.18, 0.51), p = 0.000] and hospitalization time [SMD = −1.62, 95% Cl: (−2.16, −1.07), p = 0.000]. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis based on cohort studies shows that RATS has more advantages over ST. Therefore, RATS is a more advanced and suitable surgical method for thymectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98523312023-01-21 Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Cheng-qian Wang, Jie Liu, Fei-yu Wang, Wei Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Surgeons have widely regarded sternotomy (ST) as the standard surgical method for thymectomy. Minimally invasive methods for thymectomy, including video-assisted and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), have been explored. There are some studies have researched and compared the outcomes of patients after robotic and sternotomy procedure. METHODS: We searched the databases of Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and selected the studies on the efficacy and safety of RATS or ST for thymectomy. Meta-analysis was performed for operation time, operation blood loss, postoperative drainage time, operative complications and hospitalization time. RESULTS: A total of 16 cohort studies with 1,089 patients were included. Compared to ST, RATS is an appropriate alternative for thymectomy which reduced operation blood loss [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −1.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): (−2.64, −0.99), p = 0.000], postoperative drainage time [SMD = −2.47, 95% Cl: (−3.45, −1.48), p = 0.000], operative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.31, 95% Cl: (0.18, 0.51), p = 0.000] and hospitalization time [SMD = −1.62, 95% Cl: (−2.16, −1.07), p = 0.000]. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis based on cohort studies shows that RATS has more advantages over ST. Therefore, RATS is a more advanced and suitable surgical method for thymectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9852331/ /pubmed/36684131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1048547 Text en © 2023 Wang, Wang, Liu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Wang, Cheng-qian
Wang, Jie
Liu, Fei-yu
Wang, Wei
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. sternotomy for thymectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1048547
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchengqian robotassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvssternotomyforthymectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangjie robotassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvssternotomyforthymectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liufeiyu robotassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvssternotomyforthymectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangwei robotassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvssternotomyforthymectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis