Cargando…

Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale

OBJECTIVE: The cerebellum has been identified as the key brain region that modulates reward processing in animal models. Consistently, we recently found that people with cerebellar ataxia have impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), the main symptoms related to abnormal reward processing. Due to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Chi‐Ying R., Amokrane, Nadia, Chen, Serena, Chen, Tiffany X., Lai, Ruo‐Yah, Trinh, Paula, Minyetty, Michael J., Emmerich, Haidyn, Pan, Ming‐Kai, Claassen, Daniel O., Kuo, Sheng‐Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51698
_version_ 1784872621657030656
author Lin, Chi‐Ying R.
Amokrane, Nadia
Chen, Serena
Chen, Tiffany X.
Lai, Ruo‐Yah
Trinh, Paula
Minyetty, Michael J.
Emmerich, Haidyn
Pan, Ming‐Kai
Claassen, Daniel O.
Kuo, Sheng‐Han
author_facet Lin, Chi‐Ying R.
Amokrane, Nadia
Chen, Serena
Chen, Tiffany X.
Lai, Ruo‐Yah
Trinh, Paula
Minyetty, Michael J.
Emmerich, Haidyn
Pan, Ming‐Kai
Claassen, Daniel O.
Kuo, Sheng‐Han
author_sort Lin, Chi‐Ying R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The cerebellum has been identified as the key brain region that modulates reward processing in animal models. Consistently, we recently found that people with cerebellar ataxia have impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), the main symptoms related to abnormal reward processing. Due to the lack of a validated scale to quantitatively measure ICBs in cerebellar disorders, we aim to develop and validate a new scale, Cerebellar Impulsivity–Compulsivity Assessment (CIA). METHODS: We recruited 62 cerebellar ataxia cases, categorized into those with ICBs and those without. We developed a preliminary version of CIA, containing 17 questions. We studied the internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter‐rater reliability to formulate the final version of CIA, which constitutes only 10 questions. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CIA. RESULTS: Cerebellar ataxia cases with ICBs have threefold higher total preliminary CIA scores than those without ICBs (12.06 ± 5.96 vs. 4.68 ± 3.50, p = 0.038). Cronbach's alpha revealed good internal consistency across all items (α > 0.70). By performing the test–retest reliability and inter‐rater reliability on the preliminary version of CIA, we excluded seven questions (r < 0.70) and generated the final version of CIA. Based on the ROC, a score of 8.0 in CIA was chosen as the cut‐off for ICBs in individuals with cerebellar ataxia with 81% sensitivity and 81% specificity. INTERPRETATION: CIA is a novel tool to assess ICBs in cerebellar ataxia and broaden our understanding of the cerebellum‐related cognitive and behavioral symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98523852023-01-24 Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale Lin, Chi‐Ying R. Amokrane, Nadia Chen, Serena Chen, Tiffany X. Lai, Ruo‐Yah Trinh, Paula Minyetty, Michael J. Emmerich, Haidyn Pan, Ming‐Kai Claassen, Daniel O. Kuo, Sheng‐Han Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The cerebellum has been identified as the key brain region that modulates reward processing in animal models. Consistently, we recently found that people with cerebellar ataxia have impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), the main symptoms related to abnormal reward processing. Due to the lack of a validated scale to quantitatively measure ICBs in cerebellar disorders, we aim to develop and validate a new scale, Cerebellar Impulsivity–Compulsivity Assessment (CIA). METHODS: We recruited 62 cerebellar ataxia cases, categorized into those with ICBs and those without. We developed a preliminary version of CIA, containing 17 questions. We studied the internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter‐rater reliability to formulate the final version of CIA, which constitutes only 10 questions. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CIA. RESULTS: Cerebellar ataxia cases with ICBs have threefold higher total preliminary CIA scores than those without ICBs (12.06 ± 5.96 vs. 4.68 ± 3.50, p = 0.038). Cronbach's alpha revealed good internal consistency across all items (α > 0.70). By performing the test–retest reliability and inter‐rater reliability on the preliminary version of CIA, we excluded seven questions (r < 0.70) and generated the final version of CIA. Based on the ROC, a score of 8.0 in CIA was chosen as the cut‐off for ICBs in individuals with cerebellar ataxia with 81% sensitivity and 81% specificity. INTERPRETATION: CIA is a novel tool to assess ICBs in cerebellar ataxia and broaden our understanding of the cerebellum‐related cognitive and behavioral symptoms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9852385/ /pubmed/36401598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51698 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Lin, Chi‐Ying R.
Amokrane, Nadia
Chen, Serena
Chen, Tiffany X.
Lai, Ruo‐Yah
Trinh, Paula
Minyetty, Michael J.
Emmerich, Haidyn
Pan, Ming‐Kai
Claassen, Daniel O.
Kuo, Sheng‐Han
Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
title Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
title_full Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
title_fullStr Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
title_full_unstemmed Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
title_short Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
title_sort cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51698
work_keys_str_mv AT linchiyingr cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT amokranenadia cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT chenserena cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT chentiffanyx cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT lairuoyah cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT trinhpaula cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT minyettymichaelj cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT emmerichhaidyn cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT panmingkai cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT claassendanielo cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale
AT kuoshenghan cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale