Cargando…
Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale
OBJECTIVE: The cerebellum has been identified as the key brain region that modulates reward processing in animal models. Consistently, we recently found that people with cerebellar ataxia have impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), the main symptoms related to abnormal reward processing. Due to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51698 |
_version_ | 1784872621657030656 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Chi‐Ying R. Amokrane, Nadia Chen, Serena Chen, Tiffany X. Lai, Ruo‐Yah Trinh, Paula Minyetty, Michael J. Emmerich, Haidyn Pan, Ming‐Kai Claassen, Daniel O. Kuo, Sheng‐Han |
author_facet | Lin, Chi‐Ying R. Amokrane, Nadia Chen, Serena Chen, Tiffany X. Lai, Ruo‐Yah Trinh, Paula Minyetty, Michael J. Emmerich, Haidyn Pan, Ming‐Kai Claassen, Daniel O. Kuo, Sheng‐Han |
author_sort | Lin, Chi‐Ying R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The cerebellum has been identified as the key brain region that modulates reward processing in animal models. Consistently, we recently found that people with cerebellar ataxia have impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), the main symptoms related to abnormal reward processing. Due to the lack of a validated scale to quantitatively measure ICBs in cerebellar disorders, we aim to develop and validate a new scale, Cerebellar Impulsivity–Compulsivity Assessment (CIA). METHODS: We recruited 62 cerebellar ataxia cases, categorized into those with ICBs and those without. We developed a preliminary version of CIA, containing 17 questions. We studied the internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter‐rater reliability to formulate the final version of CIA, which constitutes only 10 questions. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CIA. RESULTS: Cerebellar ataxia cases with ICBs have threefold higher total preliminary CIA scores than those without ICBs (12.06 ± 5.96 vs. 4.68 ± 3.50, p = 0.038). Cronbach's alpha revealed good internal consistency across all items (α > 0.70). By performing the test–retest reliability and inter‐rater reliability on the preliminary version of CIA, we excluded seven questions (r < 0.70) and generated the final version of CIA. Based on the ROC, a score of 8.0 in CIA was chosen as the cut‐off for ICBs in individuals with cerebellar ataxia with 81% sensitivity and 81% specificity. INTERPRETATION: CIA is a novel tool to assess ICBs in cerebellar ataxia and broaden our understanding of the cerebellum‐related cognitive and behavioral symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9852385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98523852023-01-24 Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale Lin, Chi‐Ying R. Amokrane, Nadia Chen, Serena Chen, Tiffany X. Lai, Ruo‐Yah Trinh, Paula Minyetty, Michael J. Emmerich, Haidyn Pan, Ming‐Kai Claassen, Daniel O. Kuo, Sheng‐Han Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The cerebellum has been identified as the key brain region that modulates reward processing in animal models. Consistently, we recently found that people with cerebellar ataxia have impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), the main symptoms related to abnormal reward processing. Due to the lack of a validated scale to quantitatively measure ICBs in cerebellar disorders, we aim to develop and validate a new scale, Cerebellar Impulsivity–Compulsivity Assessment (CIA). METHODS: We recruited 62 cerebellar ataxia cases, categorized into those with ICBs and those without. We developed a preliminary version of CIA, containing 17 questions. We studied the internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter‐rater reliability to formulate the final version of CIA, which constitutes only 10 questions. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CIA. RESULTS: Cerebellar ataxia cases with ICBs have threefold higher total preliminary CIA scores than those without ICBs (12.06 ± 5.96 vs. 4.68 ± 3.50, p = 0.038). Cronbach's alpha revealed good internal consistency across all items (α > 0.70). By performing the test–retest reliability and inter‐rater reliability on the preliminary version of CIA, we excluded seven questions (r < 0.70) and generated the final version of CIA. Based on the ROC, a score of 8.0 in CIA was chosen as the cut‐off for ICBs in individuals with cerebellar ataxia with 81% sensitivity and 81% specificity. INTERPRETATION: CIA is a novel tool to assess ICBs in cerebellar ataxia and broaden our understanding of the cerebellum‐related cognitive and behavioral symptoms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9852385/ /pubmed/36401598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51698 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Lin, Chi‐Ying R. Amokrane, Nadia Chen, Serena Chen, Tiffany X. Lai, Ruo‐Yah Trinh, Paula Minyetty, Michael J. Emmerich, Haidyn Pan, Ming‐Kai Claassen, Daniel O. Kuo, Sheng‐Han Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
title | Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
title_full | Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
title_fullStr | Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
title_short | Cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
title_sort | cerebellar impulsivity–compulsivity assessment scale |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36401598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linchiyingr cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT amokranenadia cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT chenserena cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT chentiffanyx cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT lairuoyah cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT trinhpaula cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT minyettymichaelj cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT emmerichhaidyn cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT panmingkai cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT claassendanielo cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale AT kuoshenghan cerebellarimpulsivitycompulsivityassessmentscale |