Cargando…

Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study explores the feasibility and safety of the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision. METHODS: From June 2017 to May 2021, 41 patients aged from 51 to 69 years underwent the transvesical approa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, YunKai, Wang, Jingyun, Zhang, DaHong, Zhang, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053140
_version_ 1784872662224338944
author Yang, YunKai
Wang, Jingyun
Zhang, DaHong
Zhang, Qi
author_facet Yang, YunKai
Wang, Jingyun
Zhang, DaHong
Zhang, Qi
author_sort Yang, YunKai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study explores the feasibility and safety of the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision. METHODS: From June 2017 to May 2021, 41 patients aged from 51 to 69 years underwent the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision (L-RALP). The prostate volume was 22.0–57.8 ml (mean: 36.3 ± 11.1 ml), with a preoperative PSA value of 3.7–12.3 ng/ml (mean: 7.3 ± 1.2 ng/mL). All preoperative Gleason scores were less than or equal to 7 points, and the preoperative TNM stage ranged from T2a to T2b. All patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer by preoperative prostate biopsy or postoperative pathological specimens after prostatectomy. The operation, blood loss, hospitalization, erectile function and postoperative urinary continence were recorded. Patients were defined as continent if they answered “zero pad” per day, and they were invited to fill out The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICI-Q-SF) after the catheter removal at 4 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: All the operations were completed by robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy without transition to open surgery. The surgery time was 105–131 min (mean: 111.3 ± 14.9 min), with an estimated blood loss of 50–220 ml (mean: 95.5 ± 27.3 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 3–8 days (mean: 5.2 ± 1.7 days), and the postoperative catheter was removed after 5–7 days (mean: 6.3 ± 1.1 days). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 35 cases (85.4%, 35/41) obtained immediate urinary continence after the catheter removal in 24h. All patients had regained continence 24 weeks postoperatively (100%, 41/41). CONCLUSION: The transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision is a safe and effective surgical technique, beneficial for early continence recovery and erectile function, and it is also suitable for prostate cancer patients after prostate enucleation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98525272023-01-21 Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer Yang, YunKai Wang, Jingyun Zhang, DaHong Zhang, Qi Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: This study explores the feasibility and safety of the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision. METHODS: From June 2017 to May 2021, 41 patients aged from 51 to 69 years underwent the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision (L-RALP). The prostate volume was 22.0–57.8 ml (mean: 36.3 ± 11.1 ml), with a preoperative PSA value of 3.7–12.3 ng/ml (mean: 7.3 ± 1.2 ng/mL). All preoperative Gleason scores were less than or equal to 7 points, and the preoperative TNM stage ranged from T2a to T2b. All patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer by preoperative prostate biopsy or postoperative pathological specimens after prostatectomy. The operation, blood loss, hospitalization, erectile function and postoperative urinary continence were recorded. Patients were defined as continent if they answered “zero pad” per day, and they were invited to fill out The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICI-Q-SF) after the catheter removal at 4 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: All the operations were completed by robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy without transition to open surgery. The surgery time was 105–131 min (mean: 111.3 ± 14.9 min), with an estimated blood loss of 50–220 ml (mean: 95.5 ± 27.3 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 3–8 days (mean: 5.2 ± 1.7 days), and the postoperative catheter was removed after 5–7 days (mean: 6.3 ± 1.1 days). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 35 cases (85.4%, 35/41) obtained immediate urinary continence after the catheter removal in 24h. All patients had regained continence 24 weeks postoperatively (100%, 41/41). CONCLUSION: The transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision is a safe and effective surgical technique, beneficial for early continence recovery and erectile function, and it is also suitable for prostate cancer patients after prostate enucleation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9852527/ /pubmed/36684143 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053140 Text en © 2023 Yang, Wang, Zhang and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Yang, YunKai
Wang, Jingyun
Zhang, DaHong
Zhang, Qi
Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
title Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
title_full Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
title_short Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
title_sort efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684143
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053140
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyunkai efficacyofthetransvesicalapproachforroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyviaabladderneckandprostatecombinedlongitudinalincisionforthetreatmentoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT wangjingyun efficacyofthetransvesicalapproachforroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyviaabladderneckandprostatecombinedlongitudinalincisionforthetreatmentoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT zhangdahong efficacyofthetransvesicalapproachforroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyviaabladderneckandprostatecombinedlongitudinalincisionforthetreatmentoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT zhangqi efficacyofthetransvesicalapproachforroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyviaabladderneckandprostatecombinedlongitudinalincisionforthetreatmentoflocalizedprostatecancer