Cargando…

Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate

PURPOSE: The study aims to compare the velopharyngeal morphology of hard and soft cleft palate (HSCP) patients after Furlow and Sommerlad palatoplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients (20 cases in Furlow palatoplasty group, 16 cases in Sommerlad palatoplasty group and 15 normal children...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Xiaofen, Liu, Weilong, Nie, Jiancun, Chen, Xiaoxuan, Dong, Yingchun, Lu, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1080955
_version_ 1784872692791377920
author Fan, Xiaofen
Liu, Weilong
Nie, Jiancun
Chen, Xiaoxuan
Dong, Yingchun
Lu, Yong
author_facet Fan, Xiaofen
Liu, Weilong
Nie, Jiancun
Chen, Xiaoxuan
Dong, Yingchun
Lu, Yong
author_sort Fan, Xiaofen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study aims to compare the velopharyngeal morphology of hard and soft cleft palate (HSCP) patients after Furlow and Sommerlad palatoplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients (20 cases in Furlow palatoplasty group, 16 cases in Sommerlad palatoplasty group and 15 normal children in the control group) were included in our study. Velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes of patients with HSCP who had either Furlow palatoplasty or Sommerlad palatoplasty for cleft palate repair were evaluated by perceptual speech assessment (PSA), lateral cephalometric radiographs and nasopharyngoscopy. To assess velopharyngeal morphology of patients treated with two techqiques, we analyzed measurements such as velar length, pharyngeal depth, and the Adequate ratio (the ratio of velar length to pharyngeal depth). Furthermore, skeletal landmarks including cranial base, cervical vertebrae, posterior nasal spine which were defined as the pharyngeal triangle were measured. Finally, the position of the point U relative to the pharyngeal triangle were compared. RESULTS: Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) rate in Furlow palatoplasty group accounted for 90%, while that in Sommerlad palatoplasty group was 81.3%. PSA of the former group was significantly better than that of the latter group (P < 0.05). Velar length, pharyngeal depth and the Adequate ratio (1.37 ± 0.14 vs. 1.41 ± 0.15) were comparable between the Furlow group and control group (P > 0.05), while Sommerlad group had a shorter velar length, deeper pharyngeal depth and a smaller Adequate ratio (1.20 ± 0.18) compared to the above two groups (P < 0.05). Furhermore, the point U of Sommerlad group in the pharyngeal triangle was higher than that of the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment modality of patients with HSCP, both Furlow palatoplasty and Sommerlad palatoplasty seem to be effective. Furlow palatoplasty appears to have velopharyngeal morphology similar to normal control group., while Sommerlad group shows a shorter velar length, deeper pharyngeal depth and a smaller Adequate ratio
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98526322023-01-21 Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate Fan, Xiaofen Liu, Weilong Nie, Jiancun Chen, Xiaoxuan Dong, Yingchun Lu, Yong Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: The study aims to compare the velopharyngeal morphology of hard and soft cleft palate (HSCP) patients after Furlow and Sommerlad palatoplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients (20 cases in Furlow palatoplasty group, 16 cases in Sommerlad palatoplasty group and 15 normal children in the control group) were included in our study. Velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes of patients with HSCP who had either Furlow palatoplasty or Sommerlad palatoplasty for cleft palate repair were evaluated by perceptual speech assessment (PSA), lateral cephalometric radiographs and nasopharyngoscopy. To assess velopharyngeal morphology of patients treated with two techqiques, we analyzed measurements such as velar length, pharyngeal depth, and the Adequate ratio (the ratio of velar length to pharyngeal depth). Furthermore, skeletal landmarks including cranial base, cervical vertebrae, posterior nasal spine which were defined as the pharyngeal triangle were measured. Finally, the position of the point U relative to the pharyngeal triangle were compared. RESULTS: Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) rate in Furlow palatoplasty group accounted for 90%, while that in Sommerlad palatoplasty group was 81.3%. PSA of the former group was significantly better than that of the latter group (P < 0.05). Velar length, pharyngeal depth and the Adequate ratio (1.37 ± 0.14 vs. 1.41 ± 0.15) were comparable between the Furlow group and control group (P > 0.05), while Sommerlad group had a shorter velar length, deeper pharyngeal depth and a smaller Adequate ratio (1.20 ± 0.18) compared to the above two groups (P < 0.05). Furhermore, the point U of Sommerlad group in the pharyngeal triangle was higher than that of the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment modality of patients with HSCP, both Furlow palatoplasty and Sommerlad palatoplasty seem to be effective. Furlow palatoplasty appears to have velopharyngeal morphology similar to normal control group., while Sommerlad group shows a shorter velar length, deeper pharyngeal depth and a smaller Adequate ratio Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9852632/ /pubmed/36684272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1080955 Text en © 2023 Fan, Liu, Nie, Chen, Dong and Lu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Fan, Xiaofen
Liu, Weilong
Nie, Jiancun
Chen, Xiaoxuan
Dong, Yingchun
Lu, Yong
Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
title Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
title_full Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
title_fullStr Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
title_short Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
title_sort comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1080955
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxiaofen comparisonofvelopharyngealmorphologyoftwopalatoplastytechniquesinpatientswithhardandsoftcleftpalate
AT liuweilong comparisonofvelopharyngealmorphologyoftwopalatoplastytechniquesinpatientswithhardandsoftcleftpalate
AT niejiancun comparisonofvelopharyngealmorphologyoftwopalatoplastytechniquesinpatientswithhardandsoftcleftpalate
AT chenxiaoxuan comparisonofvelopharyngealmorphologyoftwopalatoplastytechniquesinpatientswithhardandsoftcleftpalate
AT dongyingchun comparisonofvelopharyngealmorphologyoftwopalatoplastytechniquesinpatientswithhardandsoftcleftpalate
AT luyong comparisonofvelopharyngealmorphologyoftwopalatoplastytechniquesinpatientswithhardandsoftcleftpalate