Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pulse field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a safe alternative to other catheter ablation energy sources for patients. Although early results are encouraging, secondary data about outcomes are lacking. Herein, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel technique. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaheen, Nour, Shaheen, Ahmed, Ramadan, Abdelraouf, Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1079
_version_ 1784872703875874816
author Shaheen, Nour
Shaheen, Ahmed
Ramadan, Abdelraouf
Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
author_facet Shaheen, Nour
Shaheen, Ahmed
Ramadan, Abdelraouf
Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
author_sort Shaheen, Nour
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pulse field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a safe alternative to other catheter ablation energy sources for patients. Although early results are encouraging, secondary data about outcomes are lacking. Herein, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel technique. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and several major scientific conferences for studies reporting results regarding PFA. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, reporting 485 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent pulsed field operations. Patients averaged 60 years of age. The total duration of the procedure is 94 min. The average Fluoro procedure takes 17 min. Isolation of all pulmonary veins was 100% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (p > 0.05). Overall, the recurrence rate of arrhythmia in the participants was 2.84% (95% CI) (p > 0.05). Complications were detected during or after the PFA procedure at a rate of 2.23% (p < 0.05), with 95% CI indicating the high safety of the PFA procedure CONCLUSION: Using pulsed‐field ablation as a new treatment for atrial fibrillation has proven safe and effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98526772023-01-24 Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Shaheen, Nour Shaheen, Ahmed Ramadan, Abdelraouf Nashwan, Abdulqadir J. Health Sci Rep Narrative Review BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pulse field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a safe alternative to other catheter ablation energy sources for patients. Although early results are encouraging, secondary data about outcomes are lacking. Herein, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel technique. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus databases and several major scientific conferences for studies reporting results regarding PFA. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, reporting 485 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent pulsed field operations. Patients averaged 60 years of age. The total duration of the procedure is 94 min. The average Fluoro procedure takes 17 min. Isolation of all pulmonary veins was 100% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) (p > 0.05). Overall, the recurrence rate of arrhythmia in the participants was 2.84% (95% CI) (p > 0.05). Complications were detected during or after the PFA procedure at a rate of 2.23% (p < 0.05), with 95% CI indicating the high safety of the PFA procedure CONCLUSION: Using pulsed‐field ablation as a new treatment for atrial fibrillation has proven safe and effective. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9852677/ /pubmed/36698714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1079 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Shaheen, Nour
Shaheen, Ahmed
Ramadan, Abdelraouf
Nashwan, Abdulqadir J.
Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (pfa) technique for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36698714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1079
work_keys_str_mv AT shaheennour efficacyandsafetyofnovelpulsedfieldablationpfatechniqueforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaheenahmed efficacyandsafetyofnovelpulsedfieldablationpfatechniqueforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramadanabdelraouf efficacyandsafetyofnovelpulsedfieldablationpfatechniqueforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nashwanabdulqadirj efficacyandsafetyofnovelpulsedfieldablationpfatechniqueforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis