Cargando…

Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study

PURPOSE: Stage T1 esophageal cancer (EC) with distant metastasis (DM) is rare and poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to construct and validate a novel nomogram for predicting the probability of DM in T1 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 1,663 eligible T1 EC patients were enrolled from the Sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Kai, Jia, Mingyue, Ji, Linlin, Wang, Guangshun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684271
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.988460
_version_ 1784872713325641728
author Zhu, Kai
Jia, Mingyue
Ji, Linlin
Wang, Guangshun
author_facet Zhu, Kai
Jia, Mingyue
Ji, Linlin
Wang, Guangshun
author_sort Zhu, Kai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Stage T1 esophageal cancer (EC) with distant metastasis (DM) is rare and poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to construct and validate a novel nomogram for predicting the probability of DM in T1 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 1,663 eligible T1 EC patients were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses in the training cohort were used to identify risk factors related to DM, and then these risk factors were applied to construct the nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the nomogram. RESULTS: Among the 1,663 patients identified, 143 (8.6%) had DM. Five risk factors (tumor location, lymph node status, tumor length, T1 subtype, and grade) were significant predictors of DM. The AUC values were 0.828 and 0.851 in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively, revealing good discrimination. The calibration plots in the training cohort and validation cohort both showed good consistency. DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically effective. In addition, the nomogram has a good risk stratification ability to identify patients with different risks according to the nomogram score. In terms of survival analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses showed that age, race, tumor length, grade, lymph node status, M stage and treatment were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). For cancer-specific survival (CSS), the independent prognostic factors were age, tumor length, histology, grade, lymph node status, M stage and treatment. CONCLUSION: The nomogram could effectively predict the probability of DM in T1 EC patients. It can aid clinicians in detecting high-risk patients and making individual clinical decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98527162023-01-21 Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study Zhu, Kai Jia, Mingyue Ji, Linlin Wang, Guangshun Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: Stage T1 esophageal cancer (EC) with distant metastasis (DM) is rare and poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to construct and validate a novel nomogram for predicting the probability of DM in T1 EC patients. METHODS: A total of 1,663 eligible T1 EC patients were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses in the training cohort were used to identify risk factors related to DM, and then these risk factors were applied to construct the nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the nomogram. RESULTS: Among the 1,663 patients identified, 143 (8.6%) had DM. Five risk factors (tumor location, lymph node status, tumor length, T1 subtype, and grade) were significant predictors of DM. The AUC values were 0.828 and 0.851 in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively, revealing good discrimination. The calibration plots in the training cohort and validation cohort both showed good consistency. DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically effective. In addition, the nomogram has a good risk stratification ability to identify patients with different risks according to the nomogram score. In terms of survival analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses showed that age, race, tumor length, grade, lymph node status, M stage and treatment were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). For cancer-specific survival (CSS), the independent prognostic factors were age, tumor length, histology, grade, lymph node status, M stage and treatment. CONCLUSION: The nomogram could effectively predict the probability of DM in T1 EC patients. It can aid clinicians in detecting high-risk patients and making individual clinical decisions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9852716/ /pubmed/36684271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.988460 Text en © 2023 Zhu, Jia, Ji and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Zhu, Kai
Jia, Mingyue
Ji, Linlin
Wang, Guangshun
Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study
title Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study
title_full Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study
title_fullStr Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study
title_short Risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage T1 esophageal cancer: A population-based study
title_sort risk factors for distant metastasis and prognosis in stage t1 esophageal cancer: a population-based study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684271
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.988460
work_keys_str_mv AT zhukai riskfactorsfordistantmetastasisandprognosisinstaget1esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT jiamingyue riskfactorsfordistantmetastasisandprognosisinstaget1esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT jilinlin riskfactorsfordistantmetastasisandprognosisinstaget1esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudy
AT wangguangshun riskfactorsfordistantmetastasisandprognosisinstaget1esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudy