Cargando…

Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies

INTRODUCTION: By 2022, high levels of past COVID-19 infections, combined with substantial levels of vaccination and the development of Omicron, have shifted country strategies towards burden reduction policies. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)) could contribute to these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonnet, Gabrielle, Vassall, Anna, Jit, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010690
_version_ 1784872719067643904
author Bonnet, Gabrielle
Vassall, Anna
Jit, Mark
author_facet Bonnet, Gabrielle
Vassall, Anna
Jit, Mark
author_sort Bonnet, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: By 2022, high levels of past COVID-19 infections, combined with substantial levels of vaccination and the development of Omicron, have shifted country strategies towards burden reduction policies. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)) could contribute to these policies by helping rapidly detect, isolate and/or treat infections in different settings. However, the evidence to inform RDT policy choices in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. METHOD: We provide an overview of the potential impact of several RDT use cases (surveillance; testing, tracing and isolation without and with surveillance; hospital-based screening to reduce nosocomial COVID-19; and testing to enable earlier/expanded treatment) for a range of country settings. We use conceptual models and literature review to identify which use cases are likely to bring benefits and how these may change with outbreak characteristics. Impacts are measured through multiple outcomes related to gaining time, reducing the burden on the health system and reducing deaths. RESULTS: In an optimal scenario in terms of resources and capacity and with baseline parameters, we find marginal time gains of 4 days or more through surveillance and testing tracing and isolation with surveillance, a reduction in peak intensive care unit (ICU) or ICU admissions by 5% or more (hospital-based screening; testing, tracing and isolation) and reductions in COVID-19 deaths by over 6% (hospital-based screening; test and treat). Time gains may be used to strengthen ICU capacity and/or boost vulnerable individuals, though only a small minority of at-risk individuals could be reached in the time available. The impact of RDTs declines with lower country resources and capacity, more transmissible or immune-escaping variants and reduced test sensitivity. CONCLUSION: RDTs alone are unlikely to dramatically reduce the burden of COVID-19 in LMICs, though they may have an important role alongside other interventions such as vaccination, therapeutic drugs, improved healthcare capacity and non-pharmaceutical measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98527372023-01-20 Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies Bonnet, Gabrielle Vassall, Anna Jit, Mark BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: By 2022, high levels of past COVID-19 infections, combined with substantial levels of vaccination and the development of Omicron, have shifted country strategies towards burden reduction policies. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs)) could contribute to these policies by helping rapidly detect, isolate and/or treat infections in different settings. However, the evidence to inform RDT policy choices in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. METHOD: We provide an overview of the potential impact of several RDT use cases (surveillance; testing, tracing and isolation without and with surveillance; hospital-based screening to reduce nosocomial COVID-19; and testing to enable earlier/expanded treatment) for a range of country settings. We use conceptual models and literature review to identify which use cases are likely to bring benefits and how these may change with outbreak characteristics. Impacts are measured through multiple outcomes related to gaining time, reducing the burden on the health system and reducing deaths. RESULTS: In an optimal scenario in terms of resources and capacity and with baseline parameters, we find marginal time gains of 4 days or more through surveillance and testing tracing and isolation with surveillance, a reduction in peak intensive care unit (ICU) or ICU admissions by 5% or more (hospital-based screening; testing, tracing and isolation) and reductions in COVID-19 deaths by over 6% (hospital-based screening; test and treat). Time gains may be used to strengthen ICU capacity and/or boost vulnerable individuals, though only a small minority of at-risk individuals could be reached in the time available. The impact of RDTs declines with lower country resources and capacity, more transmissible or immune-escaping variants and reduced test sensitivity. CONCLUSION: RDTs alone are unlikely to dramatically reduce the burden of COVID-19 in LMICs, though they may have an important role alongside other interventions such as vaccination, therapeutic drugs, improved healthcare capacity and non-pharmaceutical measures. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9852737/ /pubmed/36657797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010690 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bonnet, Gabrielle
Vassall, Anna
Jit, Mark
Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies
title Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies
title_full Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies
title_fullStr Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies
title_full_unstemmed Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies
title_short Is there a role for RDTs as we live with COVID-19? An assessment of different strategies
title_sort is there a role for rdts as we live with covid-19? an assessment of different strategies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36657797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010690
work_keys_str_mv AT bonnetgabrielle istherearoleforrdtsaswelivewithcovid19anassessmentofdifferentstrategies
AT vassallanna istherearoleforrdtsaswelivewithcovid19anassessmentofdifferentstrategies
AT jitmark istherearoleforrdtsaswelivewithcovid19anassessmentofdifferentstrategies