Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy

OBJECTIVE: Local anesthesia (LA) is recommended for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PTED), but satisfactory pain management is not mostly achieved. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy of PTED for lumbar disc herniation when performed under local anaesthetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhihua, He, Jiahui, Cheng, Huantong, Lin, Shaohao, Zhang, Peng, Liang, De, Jiang, Xiaobing, Cui, Jianchao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1076257
_version_ 1784872722923257856
author Wu, Zhihua
He, Jiahui
Cheng, Huantong
Lin, Shaohao
Zhang, Peng
Liang, De
Jiang, Xiaobing
Cui, Jianchao
author_facet Wu, Zhihua
He, Jiahui
Cheng, Huantong
Lin, Shaohao
Zhang, Peng
Liang, De
Jiang, Xiaobing
Cui, Jianchao
author_sort Wu, Zhihua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Local anesthesia (LA) is recommended for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PTED), but satisfactory pain management is not mostly achieved. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy of PTED for lumbar disc herniation when performed under local anaesthetic vs. general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: From August 2018 to August 2020, the clinical data of 108 patients treated with PTED were retrospectively evaluated and separated into two groups: LA and GA based on the anesthesia method. General information and clinical outcomes of patients were included. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded before operation, 1 week after operation, and 1 year after operation. In addition, VAS for back pain and leg pain on the second postoperative day were also recorded. RESULTS: We divided the patients into two groups: 72 in LA and 36 in GA. There were no significant differences in gender, age, course of disease, body mass index, surgical segment, duration of operation, intraoperative bleeding, time of fluoroscopy, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization cost reoperation, surgical satisfaction, Macnab satisfaction, complications, preoperative and 1 year postoperatively VAS for back pain and leg pain and ODI, VAS for leg pain on the second day and 1 week postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS for back pain in GA group on the second day postoperatively, as well as the VAS for back pain and ODI at one week postoperatively, were better than those in LA group (P < 0.05). However, the total hospitalization cost in LA group was significantly lower than that in GA group (P < 0.05). Further analysis of different ages in the two groups showed that there were significant differences in the VAS for back pain on the second day postoperatively and ODI at 1 week postoperatively in the middle-aged group (45 ≤ Y ≤ 59), as well as the VAS for back pain on the second day postoperatively in the senior group (Y ≥ 60) (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant difference among other groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Long-term outcomes were similar for both PTED under LA and GA, while GA group had better short-term outcomes, especially in middle-aged and elderly patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9852754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98527542023-01-21 Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy Wu, Zhihua He, Jiahui Cheng, Huantong Lin, Shaohao Zhang, Peng Liang, De Jiang, Xiaobing Cui, Jianchao Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: Local anesthesia (LA) is recommended for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PTED), but satisfactory pain management is not mostly achieved. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical efficacy of PTED for lumbar disc herniation when performed under local anaesthetic vs. general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: From August 2018 to August 2020, the clinical data of 108 patients treated with PTED were retrospectively evaluated and separated into two groups: LA and GA based on the anesthesia method. General information and clinical outcomes of patients were included. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded before operation, 1 week after operation, and 1 year after operation. In addition, VAS for back pain and leg pain on the second postoperative day were also recorded. RESULTS: We divided the patients into two groups: 72 in LA and 36 in GA. There were no significant differences in gender, age, course of disease, body mass index, surgical segment, duration of operation, intraoperative bleeding, time of fluoroscopy, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization cost reoperation, surgical satisfaction, Macnab satisfaction, complications, preoperative and 1 year postoperatively VAS for back pain and leg pain and ODI, VAS for leg pain on the second day and 1 week postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS for back pain in GA group on the second day postoperatively, as well as the VAS for back pain and ODI at one week postoperatively, were better than those in LA group (P < 0.05). However, the total hospitalization cost in LA group was significantly lower than that in GA group (P < 0.05). Further analysis of different ages in the two groups showed that there were significant differences in the VAS for back pain on the second day postoperatively and ODI at 1 week postoperatively in the middle-aged group (45 ≤ Y ≤ 59), as well as the VAS for back pain on the second day postoperatively in the senior group (Y ≥ 60) (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant difference among other groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Long-term outcomes were similar for both PTED under LA and GA, while GA group had better short-term outcomes, especially in middle-aged and elderly patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9852754/ /pubmed/36684360 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1076257 Text en © 2023 Wu, He, Cheng, Lin, Zhang, Liang, Jiang and Cui. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Wu, Zhihua
He, Jiahui
Cheng, Huantong
Lin, Shaohao
Zhang, Peng
Liang, De
Jiang, Xiaobing
Cui, Jianchao
Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
title Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
title_full Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
title_short Clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
title_sort clinical efficacy of general anesthesia versus local anesthesia for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1076257
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhihua clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT hejiahui clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT chenghuantong clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT linshaohao clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT zhangpeng clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT liangde clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT jiangxiaobing clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy
AT cuijianchao clinicalefficacyofgeneralanesthesiaversuslocalanesthesiaforpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdiscectomy