Cargando…
Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, which is attributed to limited treatment options. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies have been proposed to provide benefits in treating pancreatic cancer. Despite its importance in trea...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.100921 |
_version_ | 1784872777316040704 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Jeremy Y Bhatt, Hardil Anup Raja, Maheen |
author_facet | Ng, Jeremy Y Bhatt, Hardil Anup Raja, Maheen |
author_sort | Ng, Jeremy Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, which is attributed to limited treatment options. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies have been proposed to provide benefits in treating pancreatic cancer. Despite its importance in treatment, clinicians are not generally well equipped to counsel their patients about CAM therapies. This review identified the quantity and assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) providing CAM recommendations for the treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify pancreatic cancer CPGs. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from 2011 to 2022. The Guidelines International Network (GIN) and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) websites were also searched. Eligible CPGs published by non-profit agencies on treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer for adults were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS: From 31 eligible search results, 7 CPGs mentioned CAM and 3 CPGs made CAM recommendations. The mean scaled domain percentages of the CPGs in this study (overall, CAM-specific) were as follows: scope and purpose (81.3%, 77.8%), stakeholder involvement (63.9%, 42.6%), rigor-of-development (51.0%, 40.3%), clarity-of-presentation (83.3%, 54.6%), applicability (42.3%, 30.5%), and editorial independence (58.3%, 58.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the CPGs demonstrated that quality varied both within and between CPGs. CPGs that scored well could be used by patients and clinicians as the basis for discussion for the use of CAM therapies. Future research should identify other appropriate CAM therapies for further development of CPGs for pancreatic cancer. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022334025). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9852932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98529322023-01-21 Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment Ng, Jeremy Y Bhatt, Hardil Anup Raja, Maheen Integr Med Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, which is attributed to limited treatment options. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies have been proposed to provide benefits in treating pancreatic cancer. Despite its importance in treatment, clinicians are not generally well equipped to counsel their patients about CAM therapies. This review identified the quantity and assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) providing CAM recommendations for the treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify pancreatic cancer CPGs. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from 2011 to 2022. The Guidelines International Network (GIN) and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) websites were also searched. Eligible CPGs published by non-profit agencies on treatment and/or management of pancreatic cancer for adults were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS: From 31 eligible search results, 7 CPGs mentioned CAM and 3 CPGs made CAM recommendations. The mean scaled domain percentages of the CPGs in this study (overall, CAM-specific) were as follows: scope and purpose (81.3%, 77.8%), stakeholder involvement (63.9%, 42.6%), rigor-of-development (51.0%, 40.3%), clarity-of-presentation (83.3%, 54.6%), applicability (42.3%, 30.5%), and editorial independence (58.3%, 58.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the CPGs demonstrated that quality varied both within and between CPGs. CPGs that scored well could be used by patients and clinicians as the basis for discussion for the use of CAM therapies. Future research should identify other appropriate CAM therapies for further development of CPGs for pancreatic cancer. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022334025). Elsevier 2023-03 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9852932/ /pubmed/36684828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.100921 Text en © 2023 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ng, Jeremy Y Bhatt, Hardil Anup Raja, Maheen Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment |
title | Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment |
title_full | Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment |
title_fullStr | Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment |
title_short | Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment |
title_sort | complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review and quality assessment |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.100921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngjeremyy complementaryandalternativemedicinementionandrecommendationsinpancreaticcancerclinicalpracticeguidelinesasystematicreviewandqualityassessment AT bhatthardilanup complementaryandalternativemedicinementionandrecommendationsinpancreaticcancerclinicalpracticeguidelinesasystematicreviewandqualityassessment AT rajamaheen complementaryandalternativemedicinementionandrecommendationsinpancreaticcancerclinicalpracticeguidelinesasystematicreviewandqualityassessment |