Cargando…
Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence–based clinical decision support (AI-CDS) tools have great potential to benefit intensive care unit (ICU) patients and physicians. There is a gap between the development and implementation of these tools. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate physicians’ perspectives...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36602843 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39114 |
_version_ | 1784872874542104576 |
---|---|
author | van der Meijden, Siri L de Hond, Anne A H Thoral, Patrick J Steyerberg, Ewout W Kant, Ilse M J Cinà, Giovanni Arbous, M Sesmu |
author_facet | van der Meijden, Siri L de Hond, Anne A H Thoral, Patrick J Steyerberg, Ewout W Kant, Ilse M J Cinà, Giovanni Arbous, M Sesmu |
author_sort | van der Meijden, Siri L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence–based clinical decision support (AI-CDS) tools have great potential to benefit intensive care unit (ICU) patients and physicians. There is a gap between the development and implementation of these tools. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate physicians’ perspectives and their current decision-making behavior before implementing a discharge AI-CDS tool for predicting readmission and mortality risk after ICU discharge. METHODS: We conducted a survey of physicians involved in decision-making on discharge of patients at two Dutch academic ICUs between July and November 2021. Questions were divided into four domains: (1) physicians’ current decision-making behavior with respect to discharging ICU patients, (2) perspectives on the use of AI-CDS tools in general, (3) willingness to incorporate a discharge AI-CDS tool into daily clinical practice, and (4) preferences for using a discharge AI-CDS tool in daily workflows. RESULTS: Most of the 64 respondents (of 93 contacted, 69%) were familiar with AI (62/64, 97%) and had positive expectations of AI, with 55 of 64 (86%) believing that AI could support them in their work as a physician. The respondents disagreed on whether the decision to discharge a patient was complex (23/64, 36% agreed and 22/64, 34% disagreed); nonetheless, most (59/64, 92%) agreed that a discharge AI-CDS tool could be of value. Significant differences were observed between physicians from the 2 academic sites, which may be related to different levels of involvement in the development of the discharge AI-CDS tool. CONCLUSIONS: ICU physicians showed a favorable attitude toward the integration of AI-CDS tools into the ICU setting in general, and in particular toward a tool to predict a patient’s risk of readmission and mortality within 7 days after discharge. The findings of this questionnaire will be used to improve the implementation process and training of end users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9853335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98533352023-01-21 Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study van der Meijden, Siri L de Hond, Anne A H Thoral, Patrick J Steyerberg, Ewout W Kant, Ilse M J Cinà, Giovanni Arbous, M Sesmu JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence–based clinical decision support (AI-CDS) tools have great potential to benefit intensive care unit (ICU) patients and physicians. There is a gap between the development and implementation of these tools. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate physicians’ perspectives and their current decision-making behavior before implementing a discharge AI-CDS tool for predicting readmission and mortality risk after ICU discharge. METHODS: We conducted a survey of physicians involved in decision-making on discharge of patients at two Dutch academic ICUs between July and November 2021. Questions were divided into four domains: (1) physicians’ current decision-making behavior with respect to discharging ICU patients, (2) perspectives on the use of AI-CDS tools in general, (3) willingness to incorporate a discharge AI-CDS tool into daily clinical practice, and (4) preferences for using a discharge AI-CDS tool in daily workflows. RESULTS: Most of the 64 respondents (of 93 contacted, 69%) were familiar with AI (62/64, 97%) and had positive expectations of AI, with 55 of 64 (86%) believing that AI could support them in their work as a physician. The respondents disagreed on whether the decision to discharge a patient was complex (23/64, 36% agreed and 22/64, 34% disagreed); nonetheless, most (59/64, 92%) agreed that a discharge AI-CDS tool could be of value. Significant differences were observed between physicians from the 2 academic sites, which may be related to different levels of involvement in the development of the discharge AI-CDS tool. CONCLUSIONS: ICU physicians showed a favorable attitude toward the integration of AI-CDS tools into the ICU setting in general, and in particular toward a tool to predict a patient’s risk of readmission and mortality within 7 days after discharge. The findings of this questionnaire will be used to improve the implementation process and training of end users. JMIR Publications 2023-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9853335/ /pubmed/36602843 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39114 Text en ©Siri L van der Meijden, Anne A H de Hond, Patrick J Thoral, Ewout W Steyerberg, Ilse M J Kant, Giovanni Cinà, M Sesmu Arbous. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 05.01.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper van der Meijden, Siri L de Hond, Anne A H Thoral, Patrick J Steyerberg, Ewout W Kant, Ilse M J Cinà, Giovanni Arbous, M Sesmu Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study |
title | Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study |
title_full | Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study |
title_fullStr | Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study |
title_short | Intensive Care Unit Physicians’ Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study |
title_sort | intensive care unit physicians’ perspectives on artificial intelligence–based clinical decision support tools: preimplementation survey study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36602843 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandermeijdensiril intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy AT dehondanneah intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy AT thoralpatrickj intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy AT steyerbergewoutw intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy AT kantilsemj intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy AT cinagiovanni intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy AT arbousmsesmu intensivecareunitphysiciansperspectivesonartificialintelligencebasedclinicaldecisionsupporttoolspreimplementationsurveystudy |