Cargando…

Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience

INTRODUCTION: The transition to digital pathology has been carried out by several laboratories across the globe, with some cases described in Portugal. In this article, we describe the transition to digital pathology in a high-volume private laboratory, considering the main challenges and opportunit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreira, Inês, Montenegro, Carlos Sachica, Coelho, Daniel, Pereira, Maria, da Mata, Sara, Carvalho, Sofia, Araújo, Ana Catarina, Abrantes, Carlos, Ruivo, José Mário, Garcia, Helena, Oliveira, Rui Caetano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100180
_version_ 1784872878630502400
author Ferreira, Inês
Montenegro, Carlos Sachica
Coelho, Daniel
Pereira, Maria
da Mata, Sara
Carvalho, Sofia
Araújo, Ana Catarina
Abrantes, Carlos
Ruivo, José Mário
Garcia, Helena
Oliveira, Rui Caetano
author_facet Ferreira, Inês
Montenegro, Carlos Sachica
Coelho, Daniel
Pereira, Maria
da Mata, Sara
Carvalho, Sofia
Araújo, Ana Catarina
Abrantes, Carlos
Ruivo, José Mário
Garcia, Helena
Oliveira, Rui Caetano
author_sort Ferreira, Inês
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The transition to digital pathology has been carried out by several laboratories across the globe, with some cases described in Portugal. In this article, we describe the transition to digital pathology in a high-volume private laboratory, considering the main challenges and opportunities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our process started in 2020, with laboratory workflow adaptation and we are currently using a high-capacity scanner (Aperio GT450DX) to digitize slides at 20×. The visualization system, Aperio eSlide Manager WebViewer, is integrated into the Laboratory System. The validation process followed the Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines. RESULTS: Regarding validation, the first phase detected an error rate of 6.8%, mostly due to digitization errors. Phase optimization and collaboration with technical services led to improvements in this process. In the second validation phase, most of the slides had the desired quality for evaluation, with only an error rate of 0.6%, corrected with a new scan. The interpathologist correlation had a total agreement rate of 96.87% and 3.13% partial agreement. CONCLUSION: The implementation and validation of digital pathology was a success, being ready for prime time. The total integration of all laboratory systems and the acquisition of new equipment will maximize their use, especially with the application of artificial intelligence algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9853351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98533512023-01-21 Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience Ferreira, Inês Montenegro, Carlos Sachica Coelho, Daniel Pereira, Maria da Mata, Sara Carvalho, Sofia Araújo, Ana Catarina Abrantes, Carlos Ruivo, José Mário Garcia, Helena Oliveira, Rui Caetano J Pathol Inform Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The transition to digital pathology has been carried out by several laboratories across the globe, with some cases described in Portugal. In this article, we describe the transition to digital pathology in a high-volume private laboratory, considering the main challenges and opportunities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our process started in 2020, with laboratory workflow adaptation and we are currently using a high-capacity scanner (Aperio GT450DX) to digitize slides at 20×. The visualization system, Aperio eSlide Manager WebViewer, is integrated into the Laboratory System. The validation process followed the Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines. RESULTS: Regarding validation, the first phase detected an error rate of 6.8%, mostly due to digitization errors. Phase optimization and collaboration with technical services led to improvements in this process. In the second validation phase, most of the slides had the desired quality for evaluation, with only an error rate of 0.6%, corrected with a new scan. The interpathologist correlation had a total agreement rate of 96.87% and 3.13% partial agreement. CONCLUSION: The implementation and validation of digital pathology was a success, being ready for prime time. The total integration of all laboratory systems and the acquisition of new equipment will maximize their use, especially with the application of artificial intelligence algorithms. Elsevier 2023-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9853351/ /pubmed/36687527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100180 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ferreira, Inês
Montenegro, Carlos Sachica
Coelho, Daniel
Pereira, Maria
da Mata, Sara
Carvalho, Sofia
Araújo, Ana Catarina
Abrantes, Carlos
Ruivo, José Mário
Garcia, Helena
Oliveira, Rui Caetano
Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience
title Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience
title_full Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience
title_fullStr Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience
title_full_unstemmed Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience
title_short Digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: The CEDAP experience
title_sort digital pathology implementation in a private laboratory: the cedap experience
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100180
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiraines digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT montenegrocarlossachica digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT coelhodaniel digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT pereiramaria digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT damatasara digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT carvalhosofia digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT araujoanacatarina digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT abrantescarlos digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT ruivojosemario digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT garciahelena digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience
AT oliveiraruicaetano digitalpathologyimplementationinaprivatelaboratorythecedapexperience