Cargando…

Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for the prevention of dry eye after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, single-blinded, parallel group, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Gyule, Lim, Dong Hui, Yoo, Young Sik, Shin, Eun Hye, Park, Jong Yup, Kim, Dohyoung, Kim, Pyungkyu, Chung, Tae-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100242
_version_ 1784872882156863488
author Han, Gyule
Lim, Dong Hui
Yoo, Young Sik
Shin, Eun Hye
Park, Jong Yup
Kim, Dohyoung
Kim, Pyungkyu
Chung, Tae-Young
author_facet Han, Gyule
Lim, Dong Hui
Yoo, Young Sik
Shin, Eun Hye
Park, Jong Yup
Kim, Dohyoung
Kim, Pyungkyu
Chung, Tae-Young
author_sort Han, Gyule
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for the prevention of dry eye after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, single-blinded, parallel group, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Between February 2020 and October 2020, patients at the Samsung Medical Center scheduled to undergo PRK to correct myopia were screened and enrolled. METHODS: The participants in the TES group were instructed to use the electrical stimulation device (Nu Eyne 01, Nu Eyne Co) at the periocular region after the operation, whereas those in the control group were to use the sham device. Dry eye symptoms were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at weeks 1, 4, and 12 using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), and the Standard Patient Evaluation for Eye Dryness II (SPEED II) questionnaire. Dry eye signs were assessed using tear break-up time (TBUT), total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS), and total conjunctival staining score according to the National Eye Institute/Industry scale. The pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were OSDI and TBUT. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and completed follow-up until the end of the study (12 patients in the TES group, 12 patients in the control group). Refractive outcomes and visual acuity were not different between the groups. No serious adverse event was reported with regard to device use. No significant difference in OSDI and SPEED II questionnaires and the DEQ-5 was observed between the groups in the 12th week after surgery. The TBUT scores 12 weeks after the surgery were 9.28 ± 6.90 seconds in the TES group and 5.98 ± 2.55 seconds in the control group with significant difference (P = 0.042). The tCFS and total conjunctival staining score were significantly lower in the TES group than in the control group at postoperative 4 weeks. Pain intensity at the first week was significantly lower in the TES group than in the control group by 65% (P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The application of TES is safe and effective in improving dry eye disease after PRK. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9853365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98533652023-01-21 Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial Han, Gyule Lim, Dong Hui Yoo, Young Sik Shin, Eun Hye Park, Jong Yup Kim, Dohyoung Kim, Pyungkyu Chung, Tae-Young Ophthalmol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for the prevention of dry eye after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, single-blinded, parallel group, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Between February 2020 and October 2020, patients at the Samsung Medical Center scheduled to undergo PRK to correct myopia were screened and enrolled. METHODS: The participants in the TES group were instructed to use the electrical stimulation device (Nu Eyne 01, Nu Eyne Co) at the periocular region after the operation, whereas those in the control group were to use the sham device. Dry eye symptoms were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at weeks 1, 4, and 12 using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), and the Standard Patient Evaluation for Eye Dryness II (SPEED II) questionnaire. Dry eye signs were assessed using tear break-up time (TBUT), total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS), and total conjunctival staining score according to the National Eye Institute/Industry scale. The pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were OSDI and TBUT. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and completed follow-up until the end of the study (12 patients in the TES group, 12 patients in the control group). Refractive outcomes and visual acuity were not different between the groups. No serious adverse event was reported with regard to device use. No significant difference in OSDI and SPEED II questionnaires and the DEQ-5 was observed between the groups in the 12th week after surgery. The TBUT scores 12 weeks after the surgery were 9.28 ± 6.90 seconds in the TES group and 5.98 ± 2.55 seconds in the control group with significant difference (P = 0.042). The tCFS and total conjunctival staining score were significantly lower in the TES group than in the control group at postoperative 4 weeks. Pain intensity at the first week was significantly lower in the TES group than in the control group by 65% (P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The application of TES is safe and effective in improving dry eye disease after PRK. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Elsevier 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9853365/ /pubmed/36685712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100242 Text en © 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Han, Gyule
Lim, Dong Hui
Yoo, Young Sik
Shin, Eun Hye
Park, Jong Yup
Kim, Dohyoung
Kim, Pyungkyu
Chung, Tae-Young
Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
title Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for the Prevention of Dry Eye Disease after Photorefractive Keratectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort transcutaneous electrical stimulation for the prevention of dry eye disease after photorefractive keratectomy: randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36685712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100242
work_keys_str_mv AT hangyule transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT limdonghui transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yooyoungsik transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shineunhye transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkjongyup transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimdohyoung transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimpyungkyu transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chungtaeyoung transcutaneouselectricalstimulationforthepreventionofdryeyediseaseafterphotorefractivekeratectomyrandomizedcontrolledtrial