Cargando…
The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors
INTRODUCTION: Panum’s limiting case is one of the typical configurations of monocular occlusion region. The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is the key to understanding how monocular occlusion region produces stereopsis. There are currently two main views on the matching rule of Panum’s limiti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061396 |
_version_ | 1784872905514942464 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Yuyu He, Ziyi Deng, Yuzhen Li, Huayun |
author_facet | Shi, Yuyu He, Ziyi Deng, Yuzhen Li, Huayun |
author_sort | Shi, Yuyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Panum’s limiting case is one of the typical configurations of monocular occlusion region. The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is the key to understanding how monocular occlusion region produces stereopsis. There are currently two main views on the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case, namely double fusion and uniqueness constraint. This paper further discusses its matching mechanism on the basis of previous studies. METHODS: In this study, fold line Panum’s stimuli were used to study the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case. In Experiment 1, fixation position was adopted to present the stimulus in a short time to explore the matching rules in Panum’s limiting case. In Experiment 2, the effect of fixation position on Panum’s limiting case matching results was further investigated. RESULTS: The results of Experiment 1 show that when stimuli are presented in a short period of time, the reported result that a single feature in one eye may be matched alternately with two features in the other eye. This matching rule is called “fast alternative matching” in this article. The results of Experiment 2 results show that the position of the fixation could affect the matching result of participants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is fast alternative matching, and the matching result is related to the attention state of the participant. These results not only provide a new perspective for matching rules in Panum’s limiting case, but also show that depth perception results in stereopsis can be influenced by top-down cognitive processing. This study provides a theoretical basis for studying the formation of stereopsis in the monocular region to a certain extent. In summary, the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is fast alternative matching. In previous studies, the perceived result of double fusion may be caused by fast alternative matching. Also, the matching results are related to the participant’s state of attention, which suggests that the depth perception results of stereopsis are influenced by top-down cognitive processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9853459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98534592023-01-21 The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors Shi, Yuyu He, Ziyi Deng, Yuzhen Li, Huayun Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Panum’s limiting case is one of the typical configurations of monocular occlusion region. The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is the key to understanding how monocular occlusion region produces stereopsis. There are currently two main views on the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case, namely double fusion and uniqueness constraint. This paper further discusses its matching mechanism on the basis of previous studies. METHODS: In this study, fold line Panum’s stimuli were used to study the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case. In Experiment 1, fixation position was adopted to present the stimulus in a short time to explore the matching rules in Panum’s limiting case. In Experiment 2, the effect of fixation position on Panum’s limiting case matching results was further investigated. RESULTS: The results of Experiment 1 show that when stimuli are presented in a short period of time, the reported result that a single feature in one eye may be matched alternately with two features in the other eye. This matching rule is called “fast alternative matching” in this article. The results of Experiment 2 results show that the position of the fixation could affect the matching result of participants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is fast alternative matching, and the matching result is related to the attention state of the participant. These results not only provide a new perspective for matching rules in Panum’s limiting case, but also show that depth perception results in stereopsis can be influenced by top-down cognitive processing. This study provides a theoretical basis for studying the formation of stereopsis in the monocular region to a certain extent. In summary, the matching rule of Panum’s limiting case is fast alternative matching. In previous studies, the perceived result of double fusion may be caused by fast alternative matching. Also, the matching results are related to the participant’s state of attention, which suggests that the depth perception results of stereopsis are influenced by top-down cognitive processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9853459/ /pubmed/36687847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061396 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shi, He, Deng and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Shi, Yuyu He, Ziyi Deng, Yuzhen Li, Huayun The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
title | The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
title_full | The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
title_fullStr | The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
title_full_unstemmed | The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
title_short | The matching rule of Panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
title_sort | matching rule of panum’s limiting case and its influencing factors |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687847 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1061396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiyuyu thematchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT heziyi thematchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT dengyuzhen thematchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT lihuayun thematchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT shiyuyu matchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT heziyi matchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT dengyuzhen matchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors AT lihuayun matchingruleofpanumslimitingcaseanditsinfluencingfactors |