Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) as a rare disease have gradually increased in recent years. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has emerged as a newly available option for the endoscopic resection of SNADETs. This study aimed to evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jixiang, Duan, Shaojie, Wang, Yichong, Peng, Hongye, Kong, Youjia, Yao, Shukun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1077806
_version_ 1784873021220061184
author Liu, Jixiang
Duan, Shaojie
Wang, Yichong
Peng, Hongye
Kong, Youjia
Yao, Shukun
author_facet Liu, Jixiang
Duan, Shaojie
Wang, Yichong
Peng, Hongye
Kong, Youjia
Yao, Shukun
author_sort Liu, Jixiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) as a rare disease have gradually increased in recent years. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has emerged as a newly available option for the endoscopic resection of SNADETs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR for ≤20 mm SNADETs. METHODS: A literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Clinical trials for studies containing tumors ≤20 mm published from January 1, 2012, to August 8, 2022. Outcomes examined were the pooled rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, and recurrence. Subgroup analyses of the resection rate were conducted stratified by sample size and polyp size. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with UEMR performed in a total of 648 tumors were included for analysis. The pooled rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection was 88.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.1–93.2) and 69.1% (95% CI: 62.2–76.1), respectively. The results showed pooled rate of intraoperative bleeding rate was 2.9% (95% CI: 0–9.0), delayed bleeding rate was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.1–2), recurrence rate was 1.5% (95% CI: 0–4.9). In the subgroup analysis, R0 and en-bloc resection rates were significantly higher in <10 mm than 10–20 mm SNADETs subgroups (R0 resection rate 83.1 vs. 48.6%; en bloc resection rate 100.0 vs. 84.0%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection was an effective and safe technique for the optional treatment for ≤20 mm SNADETs, especially of <10 mm. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022340578.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9853979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98539792023-01-21 Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Jixiang Duan, Shaojie Wang, Yichong Peng, Hongye Kong, Youjia Yao, Shukun Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) as a rare disease have gradually increased in recent years. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has emerged as a newly available option for the endoscopic resection of SNADETs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR for ≤20 mm SNADETs. METHODS: A literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Clinical trials for studies containing tumors ≤20 mm published from January 1, 2012, to August 8, 2022. Outcomes examined were the pooled rates of en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse events, and recurrence. Subgroup analyses of the resection rate were conducted stratified by sample size and polyp size. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with UEMR performed in a total of 648 tumors were included for analysis. The pooled rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection was 88.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.1–93.2) and 69.1% (95% CI: 62.2–76.1), respectively. The results showed pooled rate of intraoperative bleeding rate was 2.9% (95% CI: 0–9.0), delayed bleeding rate was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.1–2), recurrence rate was 1.5% (95% CI: 0–4.9). In the subgroup analysis, R0 and en-bloc resection rates were significantly higher in <10 mm than 10–20 mm SNADETs subgroups (R0 resection rate 83.1 vs. 48.6%; en bloc resection rate 100.0 vs. 84.0%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection was an effective and safe technique for the optional treatment for ≤20 mm SNADETs, especially of <10 mm. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022340578. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9853979/ /pubmed/36687419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1077806 Text en Copyright © 2023 Liu, Duan, Wang, Peng, Kong and Yao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Liu, Jixiang
Duan, Shaojie
Wang, Yichong
Peng, Hongye
Kong, Youjia
Yao, Shukun
Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9853979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36687419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1077806
work_keys_str_mv AT liujixiang efficacyandsafetyofunderwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor20mmsuperficialnonampullaryduodenalepithelialtumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duanshaojie efficacyandsafetyofunderwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor20mmsuperficialnonampullaryduodenalepithelialtumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyichong efficacyandsafetyofunderwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor20mmsuperficialnonampullaryduodenalepithelialtumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT penghongye efficacyandsafetyofunderwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor20mmsuperficialnonampullaryduodenalepithelialtumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kongyoujia efficacyandsafetyofunderwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor20mmsuperficialnonampullaryduodenalepithelialtumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaoshukun efficacyandsafetyofunderwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionfor20mmsuperficialnonampullaryduodenalepithelialtumorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis