Cargando…

Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review

Prediction model has been the focus of studies since the last century in the diagnosis and prognosis of various diseases. With the advancement in computational technology, machine learning (ML) has become the widely used tool to develop a prediction model. This review is to investigate the current d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kee, Ooi Ting, Harun, Harmiza, Mustafa, Norlaila, Abdul Murad, Nor Azian, Chin, Siok Fong, Jaafar, Rosmina, Abdullah, Noraidatulakma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7
_version_ 1784873025335721984
author Kee, Ooi Ting
Harun, Harmiza
Mustafa, Norlaila
Abdul Murad, Nor Azian
Chin, Siok Fong
Jaafar, Rosmina
Abdullah, Noraidatulakma
author_facet Kee, Ooi Ting
Harun, Harmiza
Mustafa, Norlaila
Abdul Murad, Nor Azian
Chin, Siok Fong
Jaafar, Rosmina
Abdullah, Noraidatulakma
author_sort Kee, Ooi Ting
collection PubMed
description Prediction model has been the focus of studies since the last century in the diagnosis and prognosis of various diseases. With the advancement in computational technology, machine learning (ML) has become the widely used tool to develop a prediction model. This review is to investigate the current development of prediction model for the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients using machine learning. A systematic search on Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) was conducted to look for relevant articles based on the research question. The risk of bias (ROB) for all articles were assessed based on the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) statement. Neural network with 76.6% precision, 88.06% sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 was found to be the most reliable algorithm in developing prediction model for cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetes patients. The overall concern of applicability of all included studies is low. While two out of 10 studies were shown to have high ROB, another studies ROB are unknown due to the lack of information. The adherence to reporting standards was conducted based on the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) standard where the overall score is 53.75%. It is highly recommended that future model development should adhere to the PROBAST and TRIPOD assessment to reduce the risk of bias and ensure its applicability in clinical settings. Potential lipid peroxidation marker is also recommended in future cardiovascular disease prediction model to improve overall model applicability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9854013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98540132023-01-21 Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review Kee, Ooi Ting Harun, Harmiza Mustafa, Norlaila Abdul Murad, Nor Azian Chin, Siok Fong Jaafar, Rosmina Abdullah, Noraidatulakma Cardiovasc Diabetol Review Prediction model has been the focus of studies since the last century in the diagnosis and prognosis of various diseases. With the advancement in computational technology, machine learning (ML) has become the widely used tool to develop a prediction model. This review is to investigate the current development of prediction model for the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients using machine learning. A systematic search on Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) was conducted to look for relevant articles based on the research question. The risk of bias (ROB) for all articles were assessed based on the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) statement. Neural network with 76.6% precision, 88.06% sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 was found to be the most reliable algorithm in developing prediction model for cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetes patients. The overall concern of applicability of all included studies is low. While two out of 10 studies were shown to have high ROB, another studies ROB are unknown due to the lack of information. The adherence to reporting standards was conducted based on the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) standard where the overall score is 53.75%. It is highly recommended that future model development should adhere to the PROBAST and TRIPOD assessment to reduce the risk of bias and ensure its applicability in clinical settings. Potential lipid peroxidation marker is also recommended in future cardiovascular disease prediction model to improve overall model applicability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7. BioMed Central 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9854013/ /pubmed/36658644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Kee, Ooi Ting
Harun, Harmiza
Mustafa, Norlaila
Abdul Murad, Nor Azian
Chin, Siok Fong
Jaafar, Rosmina
Abdullah, Noraidatulakma
Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
title Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
title_full Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
title_fullStr Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
title_short Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
title_sort cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01741-7
work_keys_str_mv AT keeooiting cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT harunharmiza cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT mustafanorlaila cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT abdulmuradnorazian cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT chinsiokfong cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT jaafarrosmina cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview
AT abdullahnoraidatulakma cardiovascularcomplicationsinadiabetespredictionmodelusingmachinelearningasystematicreview