Cargando…

Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women

BACKGROUND: To validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population. METHODS: A retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rawashdeh, Hasan, Aljalodi, Haneen, shamleh, Rafeef Abu, Alshorman, Sumyah, AboShindi, Heba, Awawdeh, Shatha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05385-z
_version_ 1784873027836575744
author Rawashdeh, Hasan
Aljalodi, Haneen
shamleh, Rafeef Abu
Alshorman, Sumyah
AboShindi, Heba
Awawdeh, Shatha
author_facet Rawashdeh, Hasan
Aljalodi, Haneen
shamleh, Rafeef Abu
Alshorman, Sumyah
AboShindi, Heba
Awawdeh, Shatha
author_sort Rawashdeh, Hasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population. METHODS: A retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies with a previous lower segment cesarean section who opted for a Trial Of Labour After Caesarean Section (TOLAC) between January 2014 to December 2020. Five variables were used for the antenatal model, while ten variables were used for the intrapartum model. Two sets of patients were created: one for the antenatal model and the other for the intrapartum model. The predicted probability for each woman was calculated and compared with the successful VBAC for each category. The predictive ability was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic, and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. RESULTS: There were seven hundred and fourteen complete cases for the antenatal model and six hundred ninety-seven for the intrapartum model. Our population's overall number of VBAC is 83.89% for the antenatal group and 82.92% for the intrapartum group. The mean predicted probability for a successful intended VBAC using the antenatal and intrapartum models were 79.53 ± 13.47 and 78.64 ± 14.03, respectively. The antenatal and intrapartum predictive models ROC had an AUC of 65% (95% CI: 60%-71%) and 64% (95% CI: 58%-69%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both models are validated in the Jordanian population. Adapting the antenatal model as supporting evidence can lead to a higher rate of TOLAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9854026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98540262023-01-21 Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women Rawashdeh, Hasan Aljalodi, Haneen shamleh, Rafeef Abu Alshorman, Sumyah AboShindi, Heba Awawdeh, Shatha BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: To validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population. METHODS: A retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies with a previous lower segment cesarean section who opted for a Trial Of Labour After Caesarean Section (TOLAC) between January 2014 to December 2020. Five variables were used for the antenatal model, while ten variables were used for the intrapartum model. Two sets of patients were created: one for the antenatal model and the other for the intrapartum model. The predicted probability for each woman was calculated and compared with the successful VBAC for each category. The predictive ability was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic, and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. RESULTS: There were seven hundred and fourteen complete cases for the antenatal model and six hundred ninety-seven for the intrapartum model. Our population's overall number of VBAC is 83.89% for the antenatal group and 82.92% for the intrapartum group. The mean predicted probability for a successful intended VBAC using the antenatal and intrapartum models were 79.53 ± 13.47 and 78.64 ± 14.03, respectively. The antenatal and intrapartum predictive models ROC had an AUC of 65% (95% CI: 60%-71%) and 64% (95% CI: 58%-69%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both models are validated in the Jordanian population. Adapting the antenatal model as supporting evidence can lead to a higher rate of TOLAC. BioMed Central 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9854026/ /pubmed/36670392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05385-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rawashdeh, Hasan
Aljalodi, Haneen
shamleh, Rafeef Abu
Alshorman, Sumyah
AboShindi, Heba
Awawdeh, Shatha
Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women
title Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women
title_full Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women
title_fullStr Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women
title_short Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women
title_sort validation of the grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in jordanian women
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05385-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rawashdehhasan validationofthegrobmanmodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansectioninjordanianwomen
AT aljalodihaneen validationofthegrobmanmodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansectioninjordanianwomen
AT shamlehrafeefabu validationofthegrobmanmodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansectioninjordanianwomen
AT alshormansumyah validationofthegrobmanmodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansectioninjordanianwomen
AT aboshindiheba validationofthegrobmanmodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansectioninjordanianwomen
AT awawdehshatha validationofthegrobmanmodelforsuccessfulvaginalbirthaftercesareansectioninjordanianwomen