Cargando…

Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is a portable imaging technology used in clinical settings. There is a need for valid tools to assess clinical competency in POCUS in medical students. The primary aim of this study was to use Kane’s framework to evaluate an interpretation-use argu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheppard, Gillian, Williams, Kerry-Lynn, Metcalfe, Brian, Clark, Marcia, Bromley, Mark, Pageau, Paul, Woo, Michael, Yi, Yanqing, Devasahayam, Augustine Joshua, Dubrowski, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04030-9
_version_ 1784873062156468224
author Sheppard, Gillian
Williams, Kerry-Lynn
Metcalfe, Brian
Clark, Marcia
Bromley, Mark
Pageau, Paul
Woo, Michael
Yi, Yanqing
Devasahayam, Augustine Joshua
Dubrowski, Adam
author_facet Sheppard, Gillian
Williams, Kerry-Lynn
Metcalfe, Brian
Clark, Marcia
Bromley, Mark
Pageau, Paul
Woo, Michael
Yi, Yanqing
Devasahayam, Augustine Joshua
Dubrowski, Adam
author_sort Sheppard, Gillian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is a portable imaging technology used in clinical settings. There is a need for valid tools to assess clinical competency in POCUS in medical students. The primary aim of this study was to use Kane’s framework to evaluate an interpretation-use argument (IUA) for an undergraduate POCUS assessment tool. METHODS: Participants from Memorial University of Newfoundland, the University of Calgary, and the University of Ottawa were recruited between 2014 and 2018. A total of 86 participants and seven expert raters were recruited. The participants performed abdominal, sub-xiphoid cardiac, and aorta POCUS scans on a volunteer patient after watching an instruction video. The participant-generated POCUS images were assessed by the raters using a checklist and a global rating scale. Kane’s framework was used to determine validity evidence for the scoring inference. Fleiss’ kappa was used to measure agreement between seven raters on five questions that reflected clinical competence. The descriptive comments collected from the raters were systematically coded and analyzed. RESULTS: The overall agreement between the seven raters on five questions on clinical competency ranged from fair to moderate (κ = 0.32 to 0.55). The themes from the qualitative data were poor image generation and interpretation (22%), items not applicable (20%), poor audio and video quality (20%), poor probe handling (10%), and participant did not verbalize findings (14%). CONCLUSION: The POCUS assessment tool requires further modification and testing prior before it can be used for reliable undergraduate POCUS assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04030-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9854184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98541842023-01-21 Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound Sheppard, Gillian Williams, Kerry-Lynn Metcalfe, Brian Clark, Marcia Bromley, Mark Pageau, Paul Woo, Michael Yi, Yanqing Devasahayam, Augustine Joshua Dubrowski, Adam BMC Med Educ Research INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is a portable imaging technology used in clinical settings. There is a need for valid tools to assess clinical competency in POCUS in medical students. The primary aim of this study was to use Kane’s framework to evaluate an interpretation-use argument (IUA) for an undergraduate POCUS assessment tool. METHODS: Participants from Memorial University of Newfoundland, the University of Calgary, and the University of Ottawa were recruited between 2014 and 2018. A total of 86 participants and seven expert raters were recruited. The participants performed abdominal, sub-xiphoid cardiac, and aorta POCUS scans on a volunteer patient after watching an instruction video. The participant-generated POCUS images were assessed by the raters using a checklist and a global rating scale. Kane’s framework was used to determine validity evidence for the scoring inference. Fleiss’ kappa was used to measure agreement between seven raters on five questions that reflected clinical competence. The descriptive comments collected from the raters were systematically coded and analyzed. RESULTS: The overall agreement between the seven raters on five questions on clinical competency ranged from fair to moderate (κ = 0.32 to 0.55). The themes from the qualitative data were poor image generation and interpretation (22%), items not applicable (20%), poor audio and video quality (20%), poor probe handling (10%), and participant did not verbalize findings (14%). CONCLUSION: The POCUS assessment tool requires further modification and testing prior before it can be used for reliable undergraduate POCUS assessment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04030-9. BioMed Central 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9854184/ /pubmed/36658642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04030-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sheppard, Gillian
Williams, Kerry-Lynn
Metcalfe, Brian
Clark, Marcia
Bromley, Mark
Pageau, Paul
Woo, Michael
Yi, Yanqing
Devasahayam, Augustine Joshua
Dubrowski, Adam
Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
title Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
title_full Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
title_fullStr Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
title_short Using Kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
title_sort using kane’s framework to build an assessment tool for undergraduate medical student’s clinical competency with point of care ultrasound
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04030-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sheppardgillian usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT williamskerrylynn usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT metcalfebrian usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT clarkmarcia usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT bromleymark usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT pageaupaul usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT woomichael usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT yiyanqing usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT devasahayamaugustinejoshua usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound
AT dubrowskiadam usingkanesframeworktobuildanassessmenttoolforundergraduatemedicalstudentsclinicalcompetencywithpointofcareultrasound