Cargando…

A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke visual impairment (VI) is a common but under-recognized care challenge. Common manifestations of post-stroke VI include: diplopia, homonymous hemianopia, oscillopsia secondary to nystagmus, and visual inattention or neglect. In acute care settings, post-stroke VI recognition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manhas, Kiran Pohar, Brehon, Katelyn, Jiang, Jennis, Damji, Karim F., Costello, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09064-9
_version_ 1784873063134789632
author Manhas, Kiran Pohar
Brehon, Katelyn
Jiang, Jennis
Damji, Karim F.
Costello, Fiona
author_facet Manhas, Kiran Pohar
Brehon, Katelyn
Jiang, Jennis
Damji, Karim F.
Costello, Fiona
author_sort Manhas, Kiran Pohar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-stroke visual impairment (VI) is a common but under-recognized care challenge. Common manifestations of post-stroke VI include: diplopia, homonymous hemianopia, oscillopsia secondary to nystagmus, and visual inattention or neglect. In acute care settings, post-stroke VI recognition and treatment are often sub-optimal as emphasis is placed on survival. Stroke survivors with VI often face inconsistencies when accessing care out of hospital because variable availability and subsidization of visual rehabilitation. We sought to identify gaps in care experienced by stroke survivors with VI from stroke survivors’ and care providers’ perspectives. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative description study across 12 care sites in Alberta, Canada, using semi-structured interviews. Survivor interviews focused on the health system experience. Provider interviews discussed approaches to care, perceived gaps, and current resources. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Iterative content analysis was completed using NVivo 12. We promoted rigour through an audit trail, open-ended questions, thick description, and collaborative coding. RESULTS: We completed 50 interviews: 19 survivor interviews and 31 provider interviews. The majority of survivors were male (n = 14) and recruited from community settings (n = 16). Providers varied in profession and location within the care continuum. Two key themes emerged from the provider and survivor interviews pertaining to (a) facets of visual rehabilitation (sub-themes: access, resources, and multidisciplinary professional interaction); and (b) functioning with post-stroke VI (sub-themes: early experiences post-stroke and living with VI in the real world). CONCLUSIONS: The visual rehabilitation model needs to be optimized to ensure transparent inter-disciplinary communication and efficient referral pathways. Future research will focus on evaluating the effectiveness of post-stroke care from multiple perspectives in Alberta.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9854189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98541892023-01-21 A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada Manhas, Kiran Pohar Brehon, Katelyn Jiang, Jennis Damji, Karim F. Costello, Fiona BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Post-stroke visual impairment (VI) is a common but under-recognized care challenge. Common manifestations of post-stroke VI include: diplopia, homonymous hemianopia, oscillopsia secondary to nystagmus, and visual inattention or neglect. In acute care settings, post-stroke VI recognition and treatment are often sub-optimal as emphasis is placed on survival. Stroke survivors with VI often face inconsistencies when accessing care out of hospital because variable availability and subsidization of visual rehabilitation. We sought to identify gaps in care experienced by stroke survivors with VI from stroke survivors’ and care providers’ perspectives. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative description study across 12 care sites in Alberta, Canada, using semi-structured interviews. Survivor interviews focused on the health system experience. Provider interviews discussed approaches to care, perceived gaps, and current resources. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Iterative content analysis was completed using NVivo 12. We promoted rigour through an audit trail, open-ended questions, thick description, and collaborative coding. RESULTS: We completed 50 interviews: 19 survivor interviews and 31 provider interviews. The majority of survivors were male (n = 14) and recruited from community settings (n = 16). Providers varied in profession and location within the care continuum. Two key themes emerged from the provider and survivor interviews pertaining to (a) facets of visual rehabilitation (sub-themes: access, resources, and multidisciplinary professional interaction); and (b) functioning with post-stroke VI (sub-themes: early experiences post-stroke and living with VI in the real world). CONCLUSIONS: The visual rehabilitation model needs to be optimized to ensure transparent inter-disciplinary communication and efficient referral pathways. Future research will focus on evaluating the effectiveness of post-stroke care from multiple perspectives in Alberta. BioMed Central 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9854189/ /pubmed/36658565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09064-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Manhas, Kiran Pohar
Brehon, Katelyn
Jiang, Jennis
Damji, Karim F.
Costello, Fiona
A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada
title A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada
title_full A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada
title_fullStr A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada
title_short A qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in Alberta, Canada
title_sort qualitative description of barriers to visual rehabilitation experienced by stroke survivors with visual impairment in alberta, canada
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36658565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09064-9
work_keys_str_mv AT manhaskiranpohar aqualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT brehonkatelyn aqualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT jiangjennis aqualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT damjikarimf aqualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT costellofiona aqualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT manhaskiranpohar qualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT brehonkatelyn qualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT jiangjennis qualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT damjikarimf qualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada
AT costellofiona qualitativedescriptionofbarrierstovisualrehabilitationexperiencedbystrokesurvivorswithvisualimpairmentinalbertacanada