Cargando…
Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: The UK is rolling out a national childhood influenza immunisation programme for children, delivered through primary care and schools. Behaviourally-informed letters and reminders have been successful at increasing uptake of other public health interventions. Therefore, we investigated th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4 |
_version_ | 1784873071196241920 |
---|---|
author | Howell-Jones, Rebecca Gold, Natalie Bowen, Sarah Bunten, Amanda Tan, Karen Saei, Ayoub Jones, Sarah MacDonald, Pauline Watson, Robin Bennett, Kirsty F. Chadborn, Tim |
author_facet | Howell-Jones, Rebecca Gold, Natalie Bowen, Sarah Bunten, Amanda Tan, Karen Saei, Ayoub Jones, Sarah MacDonald, Pauline Watson, Robin Bennett, Kirsty F. Chadborn, Tim |
author_sort | Howell-Jones, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The UK is rolling out a national childhood influenza immunisation programme for children, delivered through primary care and schools. Behaviourally-informed letters and reminders have been successful at increasing uptake of other public health interventions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of a behaviourally-informed letter on uptake of the vaccine at GP practices, and of a letter and a reminder (SMS/ email) on uptake at schools. METHODS AND RESULTS: Study 1 was a cluster-randomised parallel trial of 21,786 two- and three-year olds in 250 GP practices, conducted during flu season (September to January inclusive) 2016/7. The intervention was a centrally-sent behaviourally-informed invitation letter, control was usual care. The proportion of two- and three-year olds in each practice who received a vaccination by 31st January 2017 was 23.4% in the control group compared to 37.1% in the intervention group (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.82, 2.05, p < 0.001). Study 2 was a 2 (behavioural letter vs standard letter) × 2 (reminder vs no reminder) factorial trial of 1108 primary schools which included 3010 school years 1–3. Letters were sent to parents from providers, and reminders sent to parents from the schools. In the standard-letter-no-reminder arm, an average of 61.6% of eligible children in each school year were vaccinated, compared to 61.9% in the behavioural-letter-no-reminder arm, 63.5% in the standard-letter-plus-reminder arm, and 62.9% in the behavioural-letter-plus reminder condition, F(3, 2990) = 2.68, p = 0.046. In a multi-level model, with demographic variables as fixed effects, the proportion of eligible students in the school year who were vaccinated increased with the reminder, β = 0.086 (0.041), p < 0.036, but there was no effect of the letter nor any interaction effect. CONCLUSION: Sending a behaviourally informed invitation letter can increase uptake of childhood influenza vaccines at the GP surgery compared to usual practice. A reminder SMS or email can increase uptake of the influenza vaccine in schools, but the effect size was minimal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study 1: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921633. Study 2: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02883972. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9854224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98542242023-01-21 Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials Howell-Jones, Rebecca Gold, Natalie Bowen, Sarah Bunten, Amanda Tan, Karen Saei, Ayoub Jones, Sarah MacDonald, Pauline Watson, Robin Bennett, Kirsty F. Chadborn, Tim BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The UK is rolling out a national childhood influenza immunisation programme for children, delivered through primary care and schools. Behaviourally-informed letters and reminders have been successful at increasing uptake of other public health interventions. Therefore, we investigated the effects of a behaviourally-informed letter on uptake of the vaccine at GP practices, and of a letter and a reminder (SMS/ email) on uptake at schools. METHODS AND RESULTS: Study 1 was a cluster-randomised parallel trial of 21,786 two- and three-year olds in 250 GP practices, conducted during flu season (September to January inclusive) 2016/7. The intervention was a centrally-sent behaviourally-informed invitation letter, control was usual care. The proportion of two- and three-year olds in each practice who received a vaccination by 31st January 2017 was 23.4% in the control group compared to 37.1% in the intervention group (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.82, 2.05, p < 0.001). Study 2 was a 2 (behavioural letter vs standard letter) × 2 (reminder vs no reminder) factorial trial of 1108 primary schools which included 3010 school years 1–3. Letters were sent to parents from providers, and reminders sent to parents from the schools. In the standard-letter-no-reminder arm, an average of 61.6% of eligible children in each school year were vaccinated, compared to 61.9% in the behavioural-letter-no-reminder arm, 63.5% in the standard-letter-plus-reminder arm, and 62.9% in the behavioural-letter-plus reminder condition, F(3, 2990) = 2.68, p = 0.046. In a multi-level model, with demographic variables as fixed effects, the proportion of eligible students in the school year who were vaccinated increased with the reminder, β = 0.086 (0.041), p < 0.036, but there was no effect of the letter nor any interaction effect. CONCLUSION: Sending a behaviourally informed invitation letter can increase uptake of childhood influenza vaccines at the GP surgery compared to usual practice. A reminder SMS or email can increase uptake of the influenza vaccine in schools, but the effect size was minimal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study 1: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921633. Study 2: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02883972. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4. BioMed Central 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9854224/ /pubmed/36670376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Howell-Jones, Rebecca Gold, Natalie Bowen, Sarah Bunten, Amanda Tan, Karen Saei, Ayoub Jones, Sarah MacDonald, Pauline Watson, Robin Bennett, Kirsty F. Chadborn, Tim Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
title | Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and GP practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | can uptake of childhood influenza immunisation through schools and gp practices be increased through behaviourally-informed invitation letters and reminders: two pragmatic randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14439-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howelljonesrebecca canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT goldnatalie canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bowensarah canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT buntenamanda canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tankaren canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT saeiayoub canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jonessarah canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT macdonaldpauline canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT watsonrobin canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT bennettkirstyf canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chadborntim canuptakeofchildhoodinfluenzaimmunisationthroughschoolsandgppracticesbeincreasedthroughbehaviourallyinformedinvitationlettersandreminderstwopragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrials |