Cargando…

Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study

BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 vaccines have been the central pillar of the public health response to the pandemic, intended to enable us to ‘live with Covid’. It is important to understand change and complexity of COVID‐19 vaccines attitudes and decisions to maximize uptake through an empathetic lens. OBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockyer, Bridget, Moss, Rachael H., Endacott, Charlotte, Islam, Shahid, Sheard, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13667
_version_ 1784873084899033088
author Lockyer, Bridget
Moss, Rachael H.
Endacott, Charlotte
Islam, Shahid
Sheard, Laura
author_facet Lockyer, Bridget
Moss, Rachael H.
Endacott, Charlotte
Islam, Shahid
Sheard, Laura
author_sort Lockyer, Bridget
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 vaccines have been the central pillar of the public health response to the pandemic, intended to enable us to ‘live with Covid’. It is important to understand change and complexity of COVID‐19 vaccines attitudes and decisions to maximize uptake through an empathetic lens. OBJECTIVE: To explore the factors that influenced people's COVID‐19 vaccines decisions and how their complex attitudes towards the vaccines had changed in an eventful year. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a follow‐up study that took place in Bradford, UK between October 2021 and January 2022, 1 year after the original study. In‐depth phone interviews were conducted with 12 (of the 20 originally interviewed) people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eleven of the 12 participants interviewed had received both doses of the COVID‐19 vaccine and most intended to have a booster dose. Participants described a variety of reasons why they had decided to have the vaccines, including the following: feeling at increased risk at work; protecting family and others in their communities; unrestricted travel and being influenced by the vaccine decisions of family, friends and colleagues. All participants discussed ongoing interaction with COVID‐19 misinformation and for some, this meant they were uneasy about their decision to have the vaccine. They described feeling overloaded by and disengaged from COVID‐19 information, which they often found contradictory and some felt mistrustful of the UK Government's motives and decisions during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants had managed to navigate an overwhelming amount of circulating COVID‐19 misinformation and chosen to have two or more COVID‐19 vaccines, even if they had been previously said they were unsure. However, these decisions were complicated, demonstrating the continuum of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. This follow‐up study underlines that vaccine attitudes are changeable and contextual. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The original study was developed through a rapid community and stakeholder engagement process in 2020. Discussion with the Bradford Council Public Health team and the public through the Bradford COVID‐19 Community Insights Group was undertaken in 2021 to identify important priorities for this follow‐up study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9854290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98542902023-01-24 Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study Lockyer, Bridget Moss, Rachael H. Endacott, Charlotte Islam, Shahid Sheard, Laura Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 vaccines have been the central pillar of the public health response to the pandemic, intended to enable us to ‘live with Covid’. It is important to understand change and complexity of COVID‐19 vaccines attitudes and decisions to maximize uptake through an empathetic lens. OBJECTIVE: To explore the factors that influenced people's COVID‐19 vaccines decisions and how their complex attitudes towards the vaccines had changed in an eventful year. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a follow‐up study that took place in Bradford, UK between October 2021 and January 2022, 1 year after the original study. In‐depth phone interviews were conducted with 12 (of the 20 originally interviewed) people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eleven of the 12 participants interviewed had received both doses of the COVID‐19 vaccine and most intended to have a booster dose. Participants described a variety of reasons why they had decided to have the vaccines, including the following: feeling at increased risk at work; protecting family and others in their communities; unrestricted travel and being influenced by the vaccine decisions of family, friends and colleagues. All participants discussed ongoing interaction with COVID‐19 misinformation and for some, this meant they were uneasy about their decision to have the vaccine. They described feeling overloaded by and disengaged from COVID‐19 information, which they often found contradictory and some felt mistrustful of the UK Government's motives and decisions during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants had managed to navigate an overwhelming amount of circulating COVID‐19 misinformation and chosen to have two or more COVID‐19 vaccines, even if they had been previously said they were unsure. However, these decisions were complicated, demonstrating the continuum of vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. This follow‐up study underlines that vaccine attitudes are changeable and contextual. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The original study was developed through a rapid community and stakeholder engagement process in 2020. Discussion with the Bradford Council Public Health team and the public through the Bradford COVID‐19 Community Insights Group was undertaken in 2021 to identify important priorities for this follow‐up study. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9854290/ /pubmed/36457270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13667 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lockyer, Bridget
Moss, Rachael H.
Endacott, Charlotte
Islam, Shahid
Sheard, Laura
Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
title Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
title_full Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
title_fullStr Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
title_short Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in COVID‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK: Findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
title_sort compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? exploring change and complexity in covid‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in bradford, uk: findings from a follow‐up qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36457270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13667
work_keys_str_mv AT lockyerbridget compliantcitizensdefiantrebelsorneitherexploringchangeandcomplexityincovid19vaccineattitudesanddecisionsinbradfordukfindingsfromafollowupqualitativestudy
AT mossrachaelh compliantcitizensdefiantrebelsorneitherexploringchangeandcomplexityincovid19vaccineattitudesanddecisionsinbradfordukfindingsfromafollowupqualitativestudy
AT endacottcharlotte compliantcitizensdefiantrebelsorneitherexploringchangeandcomplexityincovid19vaccineattitudesanddecisionsinbradfordukfindingsfromafollowupqualitativestudy
AT islamshahid compliantcitizensdefiantrebelsorneitherexploringchangeandcomplexityincovid19vaccineattitudesanddecisionsinbradfordukfindingsfromafollowupqualitativestudy
AT sheardlaura compliantcitizensdefiantrebelsorneitherexploringchangeandcomplexityincovid19vaccineattitudesanddecisionsinbradfordukfindingsfromafollowupqualitativestudy
AT compliantcitizensdefiantrebelsorneitherexploringchangeandcomplexityincovid19vaccineattitudesanddecisionsinbradfordukfindingsfromafollowupqualitativestudy