Cargando…

Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration

In recent years, multicomponent hydrogels such as interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) have emerged as innovative biomaterials due to the synergistic combination of the properties of each network. We hypothesized that an innovative non-animal IPN hydrogel combining self-setting silanized hydroxy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chichiricco, Pauline Marie, Matricardi, Pietro, Colaço, Bruno, Gomes, Pedro, Jérôme, Christine, Lesoeur, Julie, Veziers, Joëlle, Réthoré, Gildas, Weiss, Pierre, Struillou, Xavier, Le Visage, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36671666
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010094
_version_ 1784873134117093376
author Chichiricco, Pauline Marie
Matricardi, Pietro
Colaço, Bruno
Gomes, Pedro
Jérôme, Christine
Lesoeur, Julie
Veziers, Joëlle
Réthoré, Gildas
Weiss, Pierre
Struillou, Xavier
Le Visage, Catherine
author_facet Chichiricco, Pauline Marie
Matricardi, Pietro
Colaço, Bruno
Gomes, Pedro
Jérôme, Christine
Lesoeur, Julie
Veziers, Joëlle
Réthoré, Gildas
Weiss, Pierre
Struillou, Xavier
Le Visage, Catherine
author_sort Chichiricco, Pauline Marie
collection PubMed
description In recent years, multicomponent hydrogels such as interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) have emerged as innovative biomaterials due to the synergistic combination of the properties of each network. We hypothesized that an innovative non-animal IPN hydrogel combining self-setting silanized hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Si-HPMC) with photochemically cross-linkable dextran methacrylate (DexMA) could be a valid alternative to porcine collagen membranes in guided bone regeneration. Calvaria critical-size defects in rabbits were filled with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate granules in conjunction with Si-HPMC; DexMA; or Si-HPMC/DexMA experimental membranes; and in a control group with a porcine collagen membrane. The synergistic effect obtained by interpenetration of the two polymer networks improved the physicochemical properties, and the gel point under visible light was reached instantaneously. Neutral red staining of murine L929 fibroblasts confirmed the cytocompatibility of the IPN. At 8 weeks, the photo-crosslinked membranes induced a similar degree of mineral deposition in the calvaria defects compared to the positive control, with 30.5 ± 5.2% for the IPN and 34.3 ± 8.2% for the collagen membrane. The barrier effect appeared to be similar in the IPN test group compared with the collagen membrane. In conclusion, this novel, easy-to-handle and apply, photochemically cross-linkable IPN hydrogel is an excellent non-animal alternative to porcine collagen membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9854494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98544942023-01-21 Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration Chichiricco, Pauline Marie Matricardi, Pietro Colaço, Bruno Gomes, Pedro Jérôme, Christine Lesoeur, Julie Veziers, Joëlle Réthoré, Gildas Weiss, Pierre Struillou, Xavier Le Visage, Catherine Bioengineering (Basel) Article In recent years, multicomponent hydrogels such as interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) have emerged as innovative biomaterials due to the synergistic combination of the properties of each network. We hypothesized that an innovative non-animal IPN hydrogel combining self-setting silanized hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Si-HPMC) with photochemically cross-linkable dextran methacrylate (DexMA) could be a valid alternative to porcine collagen membranes in guided bone regeneration. Calvaria critical-size defects in rabbits were filled with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate granules in conjunction with Si-HPMC; DexMA; or Si-HPMC/DexMA experimental membranes; and in a control group with a porcine collagen membrane. The synergistic effect obtained by interpenetration of the two polymer networks improved the physicochemical properties, and the gel point under visible light was reached instantaneously. Neutral red staining of murine L929 fibroblasts confirmed the cytocompatibility of the IPN. At 8 weeks, the photo-crosslinked membranes induced a similar degree of mineral deposition in the calvaria defects compared to the positive control, with 30.5 ± 5.2% for the IPN and 34.3 ± 8.2% for the collagen membrane. The barrier effect appeared to be similar in the IPN test group compared with the collagen membrane. In conclusion, this novel, easy-to-handle and apply, photochemically cross-linkable IPN hydrogel is an excellent non-animal alternative to porcine collagen membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures. MDPI 2023-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9854494/ /pubmed/36671666 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010094 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chichiricco, Pauline Marie
Matricardi, Pietro
Colaço, Bruno
Gomes, Pedro
Jérôme, Christine
Lesoeur, Julie
Veziers, Joëlle
Réthoré, Gildas
Weiss, Pierre
Struillou, Xavier
Le Visage, Catherine
Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_short Injectable Hydrogel Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
title_sort injectable hydrogel membrane for guided bone regeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36671666
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010094
work_keys_str_mv AT chichiriccopaulinemarie injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT matricardipietro injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT colacobruno injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT gomespedro injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT jeromechristine injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT lesoeurjulie injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT veziersjoelle injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT rethoregildas injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT weisspierre injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT struillouxavier injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration
AT levisagecatherine injectablehydrogelmembraneforguidedboneregeneration