Cargando…
Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories
Background: It has been suggested that Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and M. chimaera have differential drug susceptibility patterns. We prospectively analyzed and compared the drug susceptibility patterns among these species over an 8.5-year period. Methods: A microdilution meth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36671265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010064 |
_version_ | 1784873233287217152 |
---|---|
author | Fernandez-Pittol, Mariana Batista-Arnau, Sara Román, Angely San Nicolás, Lorena Oliver, Laura González-Moreno, Olga Martínez, José Antonio Amaro-Rodríguez, Rosanel Soler, Néstor Gené, Amadeu González-Cuevas, Araceli Tudó, Griselda Gonzalez-Martin, Julian |
author_facet | Fernandez-Pittol, Mariana Batista-Arnau, Sara Román, Angely San Nicolás, Lorena Oliver, Laura González-Moreno, Olga Martínez, José Antonio Amaro-Rodríguez, Rosanel Soler, Néstor Gené, Amadeu González-Cuevas, Araceli Tudó, Griselda Gonzalez-Martin, Julian |
author_sort | Fernandez-Pittol, Mariana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: It has been suggested that Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and M. chimaera have differential drug susceptibility patterns. We prospectively analyzed and compared the drug susceptibility patterns among these species over an 8.5-year period. Methods: A microdilution method (Slomyco(®)) was performed for drug susceptibility testing of 402 M. avium, 273 M. intracellulare, and 139 M. chimaera clinical isolates. Results: M. avium showed significantly higher resistance to moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, ethambutol, streptomycin, linezolid, cotrimoxazole, and clarithromycin. M. avium also showed higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) than M. intracellulare and M. chimaera against all drugs except ethionamide, to which M. intracellulare and M. chimaera showed greater resistance. Conclusions: Our series demonstrated differential drug resistance patterns among the most frequent M. avium complex species. M. avium was more resistant than M. intracellulare and M. chimaera versus eight antibiotics and showed greater MIC values to most of the antibiotics studied. These data suggest that knowledge of the local distribution and susceptibility profiles of these pathogens is essential for adequate clinical management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9854862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98548622023-01-21 Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories Fernandez-Pittol, Mariana Batista-Arnau, Sara Román, Angely San Nicolás, Lorena Oliver, Laura González-Moreno, Olga Martínez, José Antonio Amaro-Rodríguez, Rosanel Soler, Néstor Gené, Amadeu González-Cuevas, Araceli Tudó, Griselda Gonzalez-Martin, Julian Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background: It has been suggested that Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and M. chimaera have differential drug susceptibility patterns. We prospectively analyzed and compared the drug susceptibility patterns among these species over an 8.5-year period. Methods: A microdilution method (Slomyco(®)) was performed for drug susceptibility testing of 402 M. avium, 273 M. intracellulare, and 139 M. chimaera clinical isolates. Results: M. avium showed significantly higher resistance to moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, ethambutol, streptomycin, linezolid, cotrimoxazole, and clarithromycin. M. avium also showed higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) than M. intracellulare and M. chimaera against all drugs except ethionamide, to which M. intracellulare and M. chimaera showed greater resistance. Conclusions: Our series demonstrated differential drug resistance patterns among the most frequent M. avium complex species. M. avium was more resistant than M. intracellulare and M. chimaera versus eight antibiotics and showed greater MIC values to most of the antibiotics studied. These data suggest that knowledge of the local distribution and susceptibility profiles of these pathogens is essential for adequate clinical management. MDPI 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9854862/ /pubmed/36671265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010064 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fernandez-Pittol, Mariana Batista-Arnau, Sara Román, Angely San Nicolás, Lorena Oliver, Laura González-Moreno, Olga Martínez, José Antonio Amaro-Rodríguez, Rosanel Soler, Néstor Gené, Amadeu González-Cuevas, Araceli Tudó, Griselda Gonzalez-Martin, Julian Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories |
title | Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories |
title_full | Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories |
title_fullStr | Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories |
title_short | Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns between Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium chimaera Clinical Isolates: Prospective 8.5-Year Analysis by Three Laboratories |
title_sort | differences in drug-susceptibility patterns between mycobacterium avium, mycobacterium intracellulare, and mycobacterium chimaera clinical isolates: prospective 8.5-year analysis by three laboratories |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36671265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezpittolmariana differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT batistaarnausara differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT romanangely differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT sannicolaslorena differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT oliverlaura differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT gonzalezmorenoolga differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT martinezjoseantonio differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT amarorodriguezrosanel differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT solernestor differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT geneamadeu differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT gonzalezcuevasaraceli differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT tudogriselda differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories AT gonzalezmartinjulian differencesindrugsusceptibilitypatternsbetweenmycobacteriumaviummycobacteriumintracellulareandmycobacteriumchimaeraclinicalisolatesprospective85yearanalysisbythreelaboratories |