Cargando…
Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study
Feature fusion techniques have been proposed and tested for many medical applications to improve diagnostic and classification problems. Specifically, cervical cancer classification can be improved by using such techniques. Feature fusion combines information from different datasets into a single da...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36671677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010105 |
_version_ | 1784873287421001728 |
---|---|
author | Tawalbeh, Shefa Alquran, Hiam Alsalatie, Mohammed |
author_facet | Tawalbeh, Shefa Alquran, Hiam Alsalatie, Mohammed |
author_sort | Tawalbeh, Shefa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feature fusion techniques have been proposed and tested for many medical applications to improve diagnostic and classification problems. Specifically, cervical cancer classification can be improved by using such techniques. Feature fusion combines information from different datasets into a single dataset. This dataset contains superior discriminant power that can improve classification accuracy. In this paper, we conduct comparisons among six selected feature fusion techniques to provide the best possible classification accuracy of cervical cancer. The considered techniques are canonical correlation analysis, discriminant correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, independent component analysis, principal component analysis, and concatenation. We generate ten feature datasets that come from the transfer learning of the most popular pre-trained deep learning models: Alex net, Resnet 18, Resnet 50, Resnet 10, Mobilenet, Shufflenet, Xception, Nasnet, Darknet 19, and VGG Net 16. The main contribution of this paper is to combine these models and then apply them to the six feature fusion techniques to discriminate various classes of cervical cancer. The obtained results are then fed into a support vector machine model to classify four cervical cancer classes (i.e., Negative, HISL, LSIL, and SCC). It has been found that the considered six techniques demand relatively comparable computational complexity when they are run on the same machine. However, the canonical correlation analysis has provided the best performance in classification accuracy among the six considered techniques, at 99.7%. The second-best methods were the independent component analysis, least absolute shrinkage and the selection operator, which were found to have a 98.3% accuracy. On the other hand, the worst-performing technique was the principal component analysis technique, which offered 90% accuracy. Our developed approach of analysis can be applied to other medical diagnosis classification problems, which may demand the reduction of feature dimensions as well as a further enhancement of classification performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9855067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98550672023-01-21 Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study Tawalbeh, Shefa Alquran, Hiam Alsalatie, Mohammed Bioengineering (Basel) Article Feature fusion techniques have been proposed and tested for many medical applications to improve diagnostic and classification problems. Specifically, cervical cancer classification can be improved by using such techniques. Feature fusion combines information from different datasets into a single dataset. This dataset contains superior discriminant power that can improve classification accuracy. In this paper, we conduct comparisons among six selected feature fusion techniques to provide the best possible classification accuracy of cervical cancer. The considered techniques are canonical correlation analysis, discriminant correlation analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, independent component analysis, principal component analysis, and concatenation. We generate ten feature datasets that come from the transfer learning of the most popular pre-trained deep learning models: Alex net, Resnet 18, Resnet 50, Resnet 10, Mobilenet, Shufflenet, Xception, Nasnet, Darknet 19, and VGG Net 16. The main contribution of this paper is to combine these models and then apply them to the six feature fusion techniques to discriminate various classes of cervical cancer. The obtained results are then fed into a support vector machine model to classify four cervical cancer classes (i.e., Negative, HISL, LSIL, and SCC). It has been found that the considered six techniques demand relatively comparable computational complexity when they are run on the same machine. However, the canonical correlation analysis has provided the best performance in classification accuracy among the six considered techniques, at 99.7%. The second-best methods were the independent component analysis, least absolute shrinkage and the selection operator, which were found to have a 98.3% accuracy. On the other hand, the worst-performing technique was the principal component analysis technique, which offered 90% accuracy. Our developed approach of analysis can be applied to other medical diagnosis classification problems, which may demand the reduction of feature dimensions as well as a further enhancement of classification performance. MDPI 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9855067/ /pubmed/36671677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010105 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tawalbeh, Shefa Alquran, Hiam Alsalatie, Mohammed Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study |
title | Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Deep Feature Engineering in Colposcopy Image Recognition: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | deep feature engineering in colposcopy image recognition: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36671677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tawalbehshefa deepfeatureengineeringincolposcopyimagerecognitionacomparativestudy AT alquranhiam deepfeatureengineeringincolposcopyimagerecognitionacomparativestudy AT alsalatiemohammed deepfeatureengineeringincolposcopyimagerecognitionacomparativestudy |