Cargando…

Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images

The aim of this work was to compare the classification of cardiac MR-images of AL versus ATTR amyloidosis by neural networks and by experienced human readers. Cine-MR images and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images of 120 patients were studied (70 AL and 50 TTR). A VGG16 convolutional neural net...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Germain, Philippe, Vardazaryan, Armine, Labani, Aissam, Padoy, Nicolas, Roy, Catherine, El Ghannudi, Soraya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672702
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010193
_version_ 1784873355640307712
author Germain, Philippe
Vardazaryan, Armine
Labani, Aissam
Padoy, Nicolas
Roy, Catherine
El Ghannudi, Soraya
author_facet Germain, Philippe
Vardazaryan, Armine
Labani, Aissam
Padoy, Nicolas
Roy, Catherine
El Ghannudi, Soraya
author_sort Germain, Philippe
collection PubMed
description The aim of this work was to compare the classification of cardiac MR-images of AL versus ATTR amyloidosis by neural networks and by experienced human readers. Cine-MR images and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images of 120 patients were studied (70 AL and 50 TTR). A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained with a 5-fold cross validation process, taking care to strictly distribute images of a given patient in either the training group or the test group. The analysis was performed at the patient level by averaging the predictions obtained for each image. The classification accuracy obtained between AL and ATTR amyloidosis was 0.750 for cine-CNN, 0.611 for Gado-CNN and between 0.617 and 0.675 for human readers. The corresponding AUC of the ROC curve was 0.839 for cine-CNN, 0.679 for gado-CNN (p < 0.004 vs. cine) and 0.714 for the best human reader (p < 0.007 vs. cine). Logistic regression with cine-CNN and gado-CNN, as well as analysis focused on the specific orientation plane, did not change the overall results. We conclude that cine-CNN leads to significantly better discrimination between AL and ATTR amyloidosis as compared to gado-CNN or human readers, but with lower performance than reported in studies where visual diagnosis is easy, and is currently suboptimal for clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9855341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98553412023-01-21 Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images Germain, Philippe Vardazaryan, Armine Labani, Aissam Padoy, Nicolas Roy, Catherine El Ghannudi, Soraya Biomedicines Article The aim of this work was to compare the classification of cardiac MR-images of AL versus ATTR amyloidosis by neural networks and by experienced human readers. Cine-MR images and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images of 120 patients were studied (70 AL and 50 TTR). A VGG16 convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained with a 5-fold cross validation process, taking care to strictly distribute images of a given patient in either the training group or the test group. The analysis was performed at the patient level by averaging the predictions obtained for each image. The classification accuracy obtained between AL and ATTR amyloidosis was 0.750 for cine-CNN, 0.611 for Gado-CNN and between 0.617 and 0.675 for human readers. The corresponding AUC of the ROC curve was 0.839 for cine-CNN, 0.679 for gado-CNN (p < 0.004 vs. cine) and 0.714 for the best human reader (p < 0.007 vs. cine). Logistic regression with cine-CNN and gado-CNN, as well as analysis focused on the specific orientation plane, did not change the overall results. We conclude that cine-CNN leads to significantly better discrimination between AL and ATTR amyloidosis as compared to gado-CNN or human readers, but with lower performance than reported in studies where visual diagnosis is easy, and is currently suboptimal for clinical practice. MDPI 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9855341/ /pubmed/36672702 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010193 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Germain, Philippe
Vardazaryan, Armine
Labani, Aissam
Padoy, Nicolas
Roy, Catherine
El Ghannudi, Soraya
Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images
title Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images
title_full Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images
title_fullStr Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images
title_short Deep Learning to Classify AL versus ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis MR Images
title_sort deep learning to classify al versus attr cardiac amyloidosis mr images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672702
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010193
work_keys_str_mv AT germainphilippe deeplearningtoclassifyalversusattrcardiacamyloidosismrimages
AT vardazaryanarmine deeplearningtoclassifyalversusattrcardiacamyloidosismrimages
AT labaniaissam deeplearningtoclassifyalversusattrcardiacamyloidosismrimages
AT padoynicolas deeplearningtoclassifyalversusattrcardiacamyloidosismrimages
AT roycatherine deeplearningtoclassifyalversusattrcardiacamyloidosismrimages
AT elghannudisoraya deeplearningtoclassifyalversusattrcardiacamyloidosismrimages