Cargando…
A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy
Retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching. OBJECTIVE. To compare the clinical outcomes of single-level and multilevel intervertebral decompression for cervical degenerative radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, physical examination f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36255352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004508 |
_version_ | 1784873449670311936 |
---|---|
author | Oshina, Masahito Kawamura, Naohiro Hara, Nobuhiro Higashikawa, Akiro Ono, Takashi Takeshita, Yujiro Azuma, Seiichi Fukushima, Masayoshi Iwai, Hiroki Kaneko, Takeshi Inanami, Hirohiko Oshima, Yasushi |
author_facet | Oshina, Masahito Kawamura, Naohiro Hara, Nobuhiro Higashikawa, Akiro Ono, Takashi Takeshita, Yujiro Azuma, Seiichi Fukushima, Masayoshi Iwai, Hiroki Kaneko, Takeshi Inanami, Hirohiko Oshima, Yasushi |
author_sort | Oshina, Masahito |
collection | PubMed |
description | Retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching. OBJECTIVE. To compare the clinical outcomes of single-level and multilevel intervertebral decompression for cervical degenerative radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, physical examination findings are sometimes inconsistent with imaging data. Multilevel decompression may be necessary for multiple foraminal stenosis. Additional decompression is more invasive yet expected to comprehensively decompress all suspected nerve root compression areas. However, the surgical outcomes of this approach compared with that of single-level decompression remain unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The data of patients with spinal surgery for pure cervical radiculopathy were collected. Patients were categorized into the single-level (SLDG) or multilevel (MLDG) intervertebral decompression group at C3/C4/C5/C6/C7/T1. Demographic data and patient-reported outcome scores, including the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain and numbness in the neck, upper back, and arms, were collected. The NDI improvement rates and changes in NRS scores were analyzed one year postoperatively at patient-reported outcome evaluation. Propensity score matching was performed to compare both groups after adjusting for baseline characteristics, including the preoperative NDI and NRS scores. RESULTS. Among the 357 patients in this study, SLDG and MLDG comprised 231 and 126 patients, respectively. Two groups (n=112, each) were created by propensity score matching. Compared with the MLDG, the SLDG had a higher postoperative NDI improvement rate (P=0.029) and lower postoperative arm numbness NRS score (P=0.037). Other outcomes tended to be more favorable in the SLDG than in the MLDG, yet no statistical significance was detected. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the surgical outcomes of the SLDG showed better improvement in clinical outcomes than those of the MLDG. Numbness remained on the distal (arms) rather than the central (neck and upper back) areas in patients receiving multilevel decompression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9855740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98557402023-01-27 A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy Oshina, Masahito Kawamura, Naohiro Hara, Nobuhiro Higashikawa, Akiro Ono, Takashi Takeshita, Yujiro Azuma, Seiichi Fukushima, Masayoshi Iwai, Hiroki Kaneko, Takeshi Inanami, Hirohiko Oshima, Yasushi Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Cervical Spine Retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching. OBJECTIVE. To compare the clinical outcomes of single-level and multilevel intervertebral decompression for cervical degenerative radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, physical examination findings are sometimes inconsistent with imaging data. Multilevel decompression may be necessary for multiple foraminal stenosis. Additional decompression is more invasive yet expected to comprehensively decompress all suspected nerve root compression areas. However, the surgical outcomes of this approach compared with that of single-level decompression remain unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The data of patients with spinal surgery for pure cervical radiculopathy were collected. Patients were categorized into the single-level (SLDG) or multilevel (MLDG) intervertebral decompression group at C3/C4/C5/C6/C7/T1. Demographic data and patient-reported outcome scores, including the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain and numbness in the neck, upper back, and arms, were collected. The NDI improvement rates and changes in NRS scores were analyzed one year postoperatively at patient-reported outcome evaluation. Propensity score matching was performed to compare both groups after adjusting for baseline characteristics, including the preoperative NDI and NRS scores. RESULTS. Among the 357 patients in this study, SLDG and MLDG comprised 231 and 126 patients, respectively. Two groups (n=112, each) were created by propensity score matching. Compared with the MLDG, the SLDG had a higher postoperative NDI improvement rate (P=0.029) and lower postoperative arm numbness NRS score (P=0.037). Other outcomes tended to be more favorable in the SLDG than in the MLDG, yet no statistical significance was detected. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the surgical outcomes of the SLDG showed better improvement in clinical outcomes than those of the MLDG. Numbness remained on the distal (arms) rather than the central (neck and upper back) areas in patients receiving multilevel decompression. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-15 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9855740/ /pubmed/36255352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004508 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Cervical Spine Oshina, Masahito Kawamura, Naohiro Hara, Nobuhiro Higashikawa, Akiro Ono, Takashi Takeshita, Yujiro Azuma, Seiichi Fukushima, Masayoshi Iwai, Hiroki Kaneko, Takeshi Inanami, Hirohiko Oshima, Yasushi A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy |
title | A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy |
title_full | A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy |
title_fullStr | A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy |
title_short | A Propensity Score–matched Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Between Single-level and Multilevel Intervertebral Decompression for Cervical Radiculopathy |
title_sort | propensity score–matched analysis of clinical outcomes between single-level and multilevel intervertebral decompression for cervical radiculopathy |
topic | Cervical Spine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36255352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004508 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oshinamasahito apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT kawamuranaohiro apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT haranobuhiro apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT higashikawaakiro apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT onotakashi apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT takeshitayujiro apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT azumaseiichi apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT fukushimamasayoshi apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT iwaihiroki apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT kanekotakeshi apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT inanamihirohiko apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT oshimayasushi apropensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT oshinamasahito propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT kawamuranaohiro propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT haranobuhiro propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT higashikawaakiro propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT onotakashi propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT takeshitayujiro propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT azumaseiichi propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT fukushimamasayoshi propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT iwaihiroki propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT kanekotakeshi propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT inanamihirohiko propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy AT oshimayasushi propensityscorematchedanalysisofclinicaloutcomesbetweensinglelevelandmultilevelintervertebraldecompressionforcervicalradiculopathy |