Cargando…

Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model

Preclinical biomechanical study of topology optimization versus standard ring design for bioresorbable poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) cervical spine fusion cages delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) using a porcine model. OBJECTIVE. The aim was to evaluate range of motion (ROM) and bone fusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Nathan C., Hollister, Scott J., Agrawal, Virat, Flanagan, Colleen L., Lee, Chloe, Wheeler, Matthew B., Wang, Huan, Ebramzadeh, Edward, Sangiorgio, Sophia N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36130044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004491
_version_ 1784873453517537280
author Ho, Nathan C.
Hollister, Scott J.
Agrawal, Virat
Flanagan, Colleen L.
Lee, Chloe
Wheeler, Matthew B.
Wang, Huan
Ebramzadeh, Edward
Sangiorgio, Sophia N.
author_facet Ho, Nathan C.
Hollister, Scott J.
Agrawal, Virat
Flanagan, Colleen L.
Lee, Chloe
Wheeler, Matthew B.
Wang, Huan
Ebramzadeh, Edward
Sangiorgio, Sophia N.
author_sort Ho, Nathan C.
collection PubMed
description Preclinical biomechanical study of topology optimization versus standard ring design for bioresorbable poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) cervical spine fusion cages delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) using a porcine model. OBJECTIVE. The aim was to evaluate range of motion (ROM) and bone fusion, as a function of topology optimization and BMP-2 delivery method. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. 3D printing technology enables fabrication of topology-optimized cages using bioresorbable materials, offering several advantages including customization, and lower stiffness. Delivery of BMP-2 using topology optimization may enhance the quality of fusion. METHODS. Twenty-two 6-month-old pigs underwent anterior cervical discectomy fusion at one level using 3D printed PCL cages. Experimental groups (N=6 each) included: Group 1: ring design with surface adsorbed BMP-2, Group 2: topology-optimized rectangular design with surface adsorbed BMP-2, and Group 3: ring design with BMP-2 delivery via collagen sponge. Additional specimens, two of each design, were implanted without BMP-2, as controls. Complete cervical segments were harvested six months postoperatively. Nanocomputed tomography was performed to assess complete bony bridging. Pure moment biomechanical testing was conducted in all three planes, separately. Continuous 3D motions were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS. Three subjects suffered early surgical complications and were not evaluated. Overall, ROM for experimental specimens, regardless of design or BMP-2 delivery method, was comparable, with no clinically significant differences among groups. Among experimental specimens at the level of the fusion, ROM was <1.0° in flexion and extension, indicative of fusion, based on clinically applied criteria for fusion of <2 to 4°. Despite the measured biomechanical stability, using computed tomography evaluation, complete bony bridging was observed in 40% of the specimens in Group 1, 50% of Group 2, 100% of Group 3, and none of the control specimens. CONCLUSION. A topology-optimized PCL cage with BMP-2 is capable of resulting in an intervertebral fusion, similar to a conventional ring-based design of the same bioresorbable material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9855756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98557562023-01-27 Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model Ho, Nathan C. Hollister, Scott J. Agrawal, Virat Flanagan, Colleen L. Lee, Chloe Wheeler, Matthew B. Wang, Huan Ebramzadeh, Edward Sangiorgio, Sophia N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Basic Science Preclinical biomechanical study of topology optimization versus standard ring design for bioresorbable poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) cervical spine fusion cages delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) using a porcine model. OBJECTIVE. The aim was to evaluate range of motion (ROM) and bone fusion, as a function of topology optimization and BMP-2 delivery method. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. 3D printing technology enables fabrication of topology-optimized cages using bioresorbable materials, offering several advantages including customization, and lower stiffness. Delivery of BMP-2 using topology optimization may enhance the quality of fusion. METHODS. Twenty-two 6-month-old pigs underwent anterior cervical discectomy fusion at one level using 3D printed PCL cages. Experimental groups (N=6 each) included: Group 1: ring design with surface adsorbed BMP-2, Group 2: topology-optimized rectangular design with surface adsorbed BMP-2, and Group 3: ring design with BMP-2 delivery via collagen sponge. Additional specimens, two of each design, were implanted without BMP-2, as controls. Complete cervical segments were harvested six months postoperatively. Nanocomputed tomography was performed to assess complete bony bridging. Pure moment biomechanical testing was conducted in all three planes, separately. Continuous 3D motions were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS. Three subjects suffered early surgical complications and were not evaluated. Overall, ROM for experimental specimens, regardless of design or BMP-2 delivery method, was comparable, with no clinically significant differences among groups. Among experimental specimens at the level of the fusion, ROM was <1.0° in flexion and extension, indicative of fusion, based on clinically applied criteria for fusion of <2 to 4°. Despite the measured biomechanical stability, using computed tomography evaluation, complete bony bridging was observed in 40% of the specimens in Group 1, 50% of Group 2, 100% of Group 3, and none of the control specimens. CONCLUSION. A topology-optimized PCL cage with BMP-2 is capable of resulting in an intervertebral fusion, similar to a conventional ring-based design of the same bioresorbable material. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-15 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9855756/ /pubmed/36130044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004491 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Basic Science
Ho, Nathan C.
Hollister, Scott J.
Agrawal, Virat
Flanagan, Colleen L.
Lee, Chloe
Wheeler, Matthew B.
Wang, Huan
Ebramzadeh, Edward
Sangiorgio, Sophia N.
Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
title Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
title_full Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
title_fullStr Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
title_short Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
title_sort evaluation of topology optimization using 3d printing for bioresorbable fusion cages: a biomechanical study in a porcine model
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36130044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004491
work_keys_str_mv AT honathanc evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT hollisterscottj evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT agrawalvirat evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT flanagancolleenl evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT leechloe evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT wheelermatthewb evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT wanghuan evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT ebramzadehedward evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel
AT sangiorgiosophian evaluationoftopologyoptimizationusing3dprintingforbioresorbablefusioncagesabiomechanicalstudyinaporcinemodel