Cargando…

Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is an effective treatment option for incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in the context of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. A subset of AUS devices develops infection an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werneburg, Glenn T., Hettel, Daniel, Adler, Ava, Mukherjee, Sromona D., Lundy, Scott D., Angermeier, Kenneth W., Wood, Hadley M., Gill, Bradley C., Vasavada, Sandip P., Goldman, Howard B., Rackley, Raymond R., Shoskes, Daniel A., Miller, Aaron W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010215
_version_ 1784873471491178496
author Werneburg, Glenn T.
Hettel, Daniel
Adler, Ava
Mukherjee, Sromona D.
Lundy, Scott D.
Angermeier, Kenneth W.
Wood, Hadley M.
Gill, Bradley C.
Vasavada, Sandip P.
Goldman, Howard B.
Rackley, Raymond R.
Shoskes, Daniel A.
Miller, Aaron W.
author_facet Werneburg, Glenn T.
Hettel, Daniel
Adler, Ava
Mukherjee, Sromona D.
Lundy, Scott D.
Angermeier, Kenneth W.
Wood, Hadley M.
Gill, Bradley C.
Vasavada, Sandip P.
Goldman, Howard B.
Rackley, Raymond R.
Shoskes, Daniel A.
Miller, Aaron W.
author_sort Werneburg, Glenn T.
collection PubMed
description The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is an effective treatment option for incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in the context of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. A subset of AUS devices develops infection and requires explant. We sought to characterize biofilm composition of the AUS device to inform prevention and treatment strategies. Indwelling AUS devices were swabbed for biofilm at surgical removal or revision. Samples and controls were subjected to next-generation sequencing and metabolomics. Biofilm formation of microbial strains isolated from AUS devices was reconstituted in a bioreactor mimicking subcutaneous tissue with a medical device present. Mean patient age was 73 (SD 10.2). All eighteen artificial urinary sphincter devices harbored microbial biofilms. Central genera in the overall microbe–metabolite interaction network were Staphylococcus (2620 metabolites), Escherichia/Shigella (2101), and Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum (674). An rpoB mutation associated with rifampin resistance was detected in 8 of 15 (53%) biofilms. Staphylococcus warneri formed greater biofilm on polyurethane than on any other material type (p < 0.01). The results of this investigation, wherein we comprehensively characterized the composition of AUS device biofilms, provide the framework for future identification and rational development of inhibitors and preventive strategies against device-associated infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9855829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98558292023-01-21 Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type Werneburg, Glenn T. Hettel, Daniel Adler, Ava Mukherjee, Sromona D. Lundy, Scott D. Angermeier, Kenneth W. Wood, Hadley M. Gill, Bradley C. Vasavada, Sandip P. Goldman, Howard B. Rackley, Raymond R. Shoskes, Daniel A. Miller, Aaron W. Biomedicines Article The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is an effective treatment option for incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in the context of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. A subset of AUS devices develops infection and requires explant. We sought to characterize biofilm composition of the AUS device to inform prevention and treatment strategies. Indwelling AUS devices were swabbed for biofilm at surgical removal or revision. Samples and controls were subjected to next-generation sequencing and metabolomics. Biofilm formation of microbial strains isolated from AUS devices was reconstituted in a bioreactor mimicking subcutaneous tissue with a medical device present. Mean patient age was 73 (SD 10.2). All eighteen artificial urinary sphincter devices harbored microbial biofilms. Central genera in the overall microbe–metabolite interaction network were Staphylococcus (2620 metabolites), Escherichia/Shigella (2101), and Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum (674). An rpoB mutation associated with rifampin resistance was detected in 8 of 15 (53%) biofilms. Staphylococcus warneri formed greater biofilm on polyurethane than on any other material type (p < 0.01). The results of this investigation, wherein we comprehensively characterized the composition of AUS device biofilms, provide the framework for future identification and rational development of inhibitors and preventive strategies against device-associated infection. MDPI 2023-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9855829/ /pubmed/36672723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010215 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Werneburg, Glenn T.
Hettel, Daniel
Adler, Ava
Mukherjee, Sromona D.
Lundy, Scott D.
Angermeier, Kenneth W.
Wood, Hadley M.
Gill, Bradley C.
Vasavada, Sandip P.
Goldman, Howard B.
Rackley, Raymond R.
Shoskes, Daniel A.
Miller, Aaron W.
Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
title Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
title_full Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
title_fullStr Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
title_full_unstemmed Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
title_short Biofilms on Indwelling Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices Harbor Complex Microbe–Metabolite Interaction Networks and Reconstitute Differentially In Vitro by Material Type
title_sort biofilms on indwelling artificial urinary sphincter devices harbor complex microbe–metabolite interaction networks and reconstitute differentially in vitro by material type
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9855829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11010215
work_keys_str_mv AT werneburgglennt biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT hetteldaniel biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT adlerava biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT mukherjeesromonad biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT lundyscottd biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT angermeierkennethw biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT woodhadleym biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT gillbradleyc biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT vasavadasandipp biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT goldmanhowardb biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT rackleyraymondr biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT shoskesdaniela biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype
AT milleraaronw biofilmsonindwellingartificialurinarysphincterdevicesharborcomplexmicrobemetaboliteinteractionnetworksandreconstitutedifferentiallyinvitrobymaterialtype