Cargando…
Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles
IMPORTANCE: Preprints have been widely adopted to enhance the timely dissemination of research across many scientific fields. Concerns remain that early, public access to preliminary medical research has the potential to propagate misleading or faulty research that has been conducted or interpreted...
Autores principales: | Janda, Guneet, Khetpal, Vishal, Shi, Xiaoting, Ross, Joseph S., Wallach, Joshua D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9856222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36484989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45847 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Characterization of Comments About bioRxiv and medRxiv Preprints
por: Carneiro, Clarissa França Dias, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals
por: Gehanno, Jean-Francois, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv
por: Strcic, Josip, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A descriptive analysis of the data availability statements accompanying medRxiv preprints and a comparison with their published counterparts
por: McGuinness, Luke A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
COVID-19 randomized controlled trials in medRxiv and PubMed
por: Kataoka, Yuki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)