Cargando…

Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men

We sought to determine the skeletal muscle genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA responses to one bout of lower load (LL) versus higher load (HL) resistance exercise. Trained college-aged males (n = 11, 23 ± 4 years old, 4 ± 3 years self-reported training) performed LL or HL bouts to failure separate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sexton, Casey L., Godwin, Joshua S., McIntosh, Mason C., Ruple, Bradley A., Osburn, Shelby C., Hollingsworth, Blake R., Kontos, Nicholas J., Agostinelli, Philip J., Kavazis, Andreas N., Ziegenfuss, Tim N., Lopez, Hector L., Smith, Ryan, Young, Kaelin C., Dwaraka, Varun B., Frugé, Andrew D., Mobley, Christopher B., Sharples, Adam P., Roberts, Michael D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9856538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12020263
_version_ 1784873656054185984
author Sexton, Casey L.
Godwin, Joshua S.
McIntosh, Mason C.
Ruple, Bradley A.
Osburn, Shelby C.
Hollingsworth, Blake R.
Kontos, Nicholas J.
Agostinelli, Philip J.
Kavazis, Andreas N.
Ziegenfuss, Tim N.
Lopez, Hector L.
Smith, Ryan
Young, Kaelin C.
Dwaraka, Varun B.
Frugé, Andrew D.
Mobley, Christopher B.
Sharples, Adam P.
Roberts, Michael D.
author_facet Sexton, Casey L.
Godwin, Joshua S.
McIntosh, Mason C.
Ruple, Bradley A.
Osburn, Shelby C.
Hollingsworth, Blake R.
Kontos, Nicholas J.
Agostinelli, Philip J.
Kavazis, Andreas N.
Ziegenfuss, Tim N.
Lopez, Hector L.
Smith, Ryan
Young, Kaelin C.
Dwaraka, Varun B.
Frugé, Andrew D.
Mobley, Christopher B.
Sharples, Adam P.
Roberts, Michael D.
author_sort Sexton, Casey L.
collection PubMed
description We sought to determine the skeletal muscle genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA responses to one bout of lower load (LL) versus higher load (HL) resistance exercise. Trained college-aged males (n = 11, 23 ± 4 years old, 4 ± 3 years self-reported training) performed LL or HL bouts to failure separated by one week. The HL bout (i.e., 80 Fail) consisted of four sets of back squats and four sets of leg extensions to failure using 80% of participants estimated one-repetition maximum (i.e., est. 1-RM). The LL bout (i.e., 30 Fail) implemented the same paradigm with 30% of est. 1-RM. Vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were collected before, 3 h, and 6 h after each bout. Muscle DNA and RNA were batch-isolated and analyzed using the 850k Illumina MethylationEPIC array and Clariom S mRNA microarray, respectively. Performed repetitions were significantly greater during the 30 Fail versus 80 Fail (p < 0.001), although total training volume (sets × reps × load) was not significantly different between bouts (p = 0.571). Regardless of bout, more CpG site methylation changes were observed at 3 h versus 6 h post exercise (239,951 versus 12,419, respectively; p < 0.01), and nuclear global ten-eleven translocation (TET) activity, but not global DNA methyltransferase activity, increased 3 h and 6 h following exercise regardless of bout. The percentage of genes significantly altered at the mRNA level that demonstrated opposite DNA methylation patterns was greater 3 h versus 6 h following exercise (~75% versus ~15%, respectively). Moreover, high percentages of genes that were up- or downregulated 6 h following exercise also demonstrated significantly inversed DNA methylation patterns across one or more CpG sites 3 h following exercise (65% and 82%, respectively). While 30 Fail decreased DNA methylation across various promoter regions versus 80 Fail, transcriptome-wide mRNA and bioinformatics indicated that gene expression signatures were largely similar between bouts. Bioinformatics overlay of DNA methylation and mRNA expression data indicated that genes related to “Focal adhesion,” “MAPK signaling,” and “PI3K-Akt signaling” were significantly affected at the 3 h and 6 h time points, and again this was regardless of bout. In conclusion, extensive molecular profiling suggests that post-exercise alterations in the skeletal muscle DNA methylome and mRNA transcriptome elicited by LL and HL training bouts to failure are largely similar, and this could be related to equal volumes performed between bouts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9856538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98565382023-01-21 Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men Sexton, Casey L. Godwin, Joshua S. McIntosh, Mason C. Ruple, Bradley A. Osburn, Shelby C. Hollingsworth, Blake R. Kontos, Nicholas J. Agostinelli, Philip J. Kavazis, Andreas N. Ziegenfuss, Tim N. Lopez, Hector L. Smith, Ryan Young, Kaelin C. Dwaraka, Varun B. Frugé, Andrew D. Mobley, Christopher B. Sharples, Adam P. Roberts, Michael D. Cells Article We sought to determine the skeletal muscle genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA responses to one bout of lower load (LL) versus higher load (HL) resistance exercise. Trained college-aged males (n = 11, 23 ± 4 years old, 4 ± 3 years self-reported training) performed LL or HL bouts to failure separated by one week. The HL bout (i.e., 80 Fail) consisted of four sets of back squats and four sets of leg extensions to failure using 80% of participants estimated one-repetition maximum (i.e., est. 1-RM). The LL bout (i.e., 30 Fail) implemented the same paradigm with 30% of est. 1-RM. Vastus lateralis muscle biopsies were collected before, 3 h, and 6 h after each bout. Muscle DNA and RNA were batch-isolated and analyzed using the 850k Illumina MethylationEPIC array and Clariom S mRNA microarray, respectively. Performed repetitions were significantly greater during the 30 Fail versus 80 Fail (p < 0.001), although total training volume (sets × reps × load) was not significantly different between bouts (p = 0.571). Regardless of bout, more CpG site methylation changes were observed at 3 h versus 6 h post exercise (239,951 versus 12,419, respectively; p < 0.01), and nuclear global ten-eleven translocation (TET) activity, but not global DNA methyltransferase activity, increased 3 h and 6 h following exercise regardless of bout. The percentage of genes significantly altered at the mRNA level that demonstrated opposite DNA methylation patterns was greater 3 h versus 6 h following exercise (~75% versus ~15%, respectively). Moreover, high percentages of genes that were up- or downregulated 6 h following exercise also demonstrated significantly inversed DNA methylation patterns across one or more CpG sites 3 h following exercise (65% and 82%, respectively). While 30 Fail decreased DNA methylation across various promoter regions versus 80 Fail, transcriptome-wide mRNA and bioinformatics indicated that gene expression signatures were largely similar between bouts. Bioinformatics overlay of DNA methylation and mRNA expression data indicated that genes related to “Focal adhesion,” “MAPK signaling,” and “PI3K-Akt signaling” were significantly affected at the 3 h and 6 h time points, and again this was regardless of bout. In conclusion, extensive molecular profiling suggests that post-exercise alterations in the skeletal muscle DNA methylome and mRNA transcriptome elicited by LL and HL training bouts to failure are largely similar, and this could be related to equal volumes performed between bouts. MDPI 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9856538/ /pubmed/36672198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12020263 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sexton, Casey L.
Godwin, Joshua S.
McIntosh, Mason C.
Ruple, Bradley A.
Osburn, Shelby C.
Hollingsworth, Blake R.
Kontos, Nicholas J.
Agostinelli, Philip J.
Kavazis, Andreas N.
Ziegenfuss, Tim N.
Lopez, Hector L.
Smith, Ryan
Young, Kaelin C.
Dwaraka, Varun B.
Frugé, Andrew D.
Mobley, Christopher B.
Sharples, Adam P.
Roberts, Michael D.
Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men
title Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men
title_full Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men
title_fullStr Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men
title_full_unstemmed Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men
title_short Skeletal Muscle DNA Methylation and mRNA Responses to a Bout of Higher versus Lower Load Resistance Exercise in Previously Trained Men
title_sort skeletal muscle dna methylation and mrna responses to a bout of higher versus lower load resistance exercise in previously trained men
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9856538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672198
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12020263
work_keys_str_mv AT sextoncaseyl skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT godwinjoshuas skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT mcintoshmasonc skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT ruplebradleya skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT osburnshelbyc skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT hollingsworthblaker skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT kontosnicholasj skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT agostinelliphilipj skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT kavazisandreasn skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT ziegenfusstimn skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT lopezhectorl skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT smithryan skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT youngkaelinc skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT dwarakavarunb skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT frugeandrewd skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT mobleychristopherb skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT sharplesadamp skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen
AT robertsmichaeld skeletalmusclednamethylationandmrnaresponsestoaboutofhigherversuslowerloadresistanceexerciseinpreviouslytrainedmen