Cargando…
Comparison of Readability Scores for Written Health Information Across Formulas Using Automated vs Manual Measures
This cross-sectional study examines the variability of readability scores across widely used online calculators.
Autores principales: | Mac, Olivia, Ayre, Julie, Bell, Katy, McCaffery, Kirsten, Muscat, Danielle M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9856555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46051 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Multiple Automated Health Literacy Assessments of Written Health Information: Development of the SHeLL (Sydney Health Literacy Lab) Health Literacy Editor v1
por: Ayre, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Helping patient educators meet health literacy needs: End-user testing and iterative development of an innovative health literacy editing tool
por: Ayre, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Systematic review of health literacy champions: who, what and how?
por: Ayre, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Embedding health literacy research and best practice within a socioeconomically and culturally diverse health service: A narrative case study and revised model of co‐creation
por: Muscat, Danielle M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Integrating consumer perspectives into a large-scale health literacy audit of health information materials: learnings and next steps
por: Ayre, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)