Cargando…
A Review of the Current Clinical Evidence for Loco-Regional Moderate Hyperthermia in the Adjunct Management of Cancers
SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is a large gap in knowledge amongst the oncology community of moderate hyperthermia use in cancer management. This review provides an overview of clinical data on the use of loco-regional and superficial hyperthermia in the adjunct management of cancers. It is updated using hig...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9856725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36672300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15020346 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is a large gap in knowledge amongst the oncology community of moderate hyperthermia use in cancer management. This review provides an overview of clinical data on the use of loco-regional and superficial hyperthermia in the adjunct management of cancers. It is updated using higher-level evidence from prospective, comparative studies and meta-analyses. The methodology and results are summarised and tabulated according to tumour type for easy reference. ABSTRACT: Regional hyperthermia therapy (RHT) is a treatment that applies moderate heat to tumours in an attempt to potentiate the effects of oncological treatments and improve responses. Although it has been used for many years, the mechanisms of action are not fully understood. Heterogenous practices, poor quality assurance, conflicting clinical evidence and lack of familiarity have hindered its use. Despite this, several centres recognise its potential and have adopted it in their standard treatment protocols. In recent times, significant technical improvements have been made and there is an increasing pool of evidence that could revolutionise its use. Our narrative review aims to summarise the recently published prospective trial evidence and present the clinical effects of RHT when added to standard cancer treatments. In total, 31 studies with higher-quality evidence across various subsites are discussed herein. Although not all of these studies are level 1 evidence, benefits of moderate RHT in improving local tumour control, survival outcomes and quality of life scores were observed across the different cancer subsites with minimal increase in toxicities. This paper may serve as a reference when considering this technique for specific indications. |
---|