Comparison of Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes by Gender in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (KCSG HN13-01)

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Though women account for approximately 30% of newly diagnosed head and neck cancer, women have comprised only 17% of the study population in landmark clinical trials so far. Caution is therefore required when applying research outcomes directly to women in actual clinical practice. We hypothesized that there is no difference in treatment strategies and their effect on survival in treating locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) in the real world. We aimed to compare multidisciplinary treatment modalities and their outcomes by sex in 445 patients with stage III to IVB LA-HNSCC. In our overall and propensity-matched cohorts, there were no significant differences in the treatment strategy or OS by gender. In the present era, in which a multidisciplinary approach is emphasized, we conclude that there is no apparent sex-based disparity in the treatment modalities and outcomes in treating LA-HNSCC. ABSTRACT: We aimed to compare treatment modalities and outcomes by gender in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). We characterized the sex-specific differences and compared the overall survival (OS) between male and female patients in a multicenter cohort of LA-HNSCC. To minimize the observed confounding, propensity score matching was utilized. The study included 445 patients; 385 (86.5%) were men and 60 (13.5%) were women. In terms of age, smoking habits, drinking habits, and primary tumor locations, there was a significant imbalance in sex before the matching. Propensity score matching yielded 60 patient pairs, with no statistical difference between the sexes in terms of their characteristics. As for the treatment strategies, there were no significant differences between the sexes before (p = 0.260) and after (p = 0.585) the propensity score matching. When comparing the survival probabilities between the sexes, OS was not significantly different in the overall (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.59–1.76; p = 0.938) and propensity-score-matched population (HR 1.46; 95% CI 0.68–3.17; p = 0.331). These results suggest that there was no difference in prognosis by gender in the treatment modalities and outcomes of LA-HNSCC in real-world practice.