Cargando…

Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atia, Andrew N., Sergesketter, Amanda R., Morris, Miranda X., Biswas, Sonali, Zhang, Gloria, Langdell, Hannah C., Hollins, Andrew W., Phillips, Brett T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9857536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780
_version_ 1784873890206449664
author Atia, Andrew N.
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Morris, Miranda X.
Biswas, Sonali
Zhang, Gloria
Langdell, Hannah C.
Hollins, Andrew W.
Phillips, Brett T.
author_facet Atia, Andrew N.
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Morris, Miranda X.
Biswas, Sonali
Zhang, Gloria
Langdell, Hannah C.
Hollins, Andrew W.
Phillips, Brett T.
author_sort Atia, Andrew N.
collection PubMed
description Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exists in prepectoral reconstruction. This study aims to identify pertinent TE characteristics and evaluate their correlations with PI size for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: This study analyzed patients who underwent two-stage prepectoral tissue expansion for breast reconstruction followed by implant placement. Patient demographics and oncologic characteristics were recorded. TE and PI features were evaluated. Significant predictors for PI volume were identified using linear and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 177 patients and 296 breast reconstructions that met inclusion criteria. All reconstructions were performed in the prepectoral plane with the majority using acellular dermal matrix (93.8%) and primarily silicone implants (94.3%). Mean TE size was 485.4 cm(3) with mean initial fill of 245.8 cm(3) and mean final fill of 454.4 cm(3). Mean PI size was 502.9 cm(3) with a differential fill volume (PI-TE) of 11.7 cm(3). Multivariate analysis identified significant features for PI size prediction, including TE size (R(2) = 0.60; P < 0.0001) and TE final fill volume (R(2) = 0.57; P < 0.0001). The prediction expression for TE final fill and TE size was calculated as 26.6 + 0.38*(TE final fill) + 0.61*(TE size). CONCLUSIONS: TE size and final expansion volume were significant variables for implant size prediction. With prepectoral implant placement gaining popularity, the predictive formula may help optimize preoperative planning and decision-making in prepectoral reconstructions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9857536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98575362023-01-24 Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Atia, Andrew N. Sergesketter, Amanda R. Morris, Miranda X. Biswas, Sonali Zhang, Gloria Langdell, Hannah C. Hollins, Andrew W. Phillips, Brett T. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exists in prepectoral reconstruction. This study aims to identify pertinent TE characteristics and evaluate their correlations with PI size for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: This study analyzed patients who underwent two-stage prepectoral tissue expansion for breast reconstruction followed by implant placement. Patient demographics and oncologic characteristics were recorded. TE and PI features were evaluated. Significant predictors for PI volume were identified using linear and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 177 patients and 296 breast reconstructions that met inclusion criteria. All reconstructions were performed in the prepectoral plane with the majority using acellular dermal matrix (93.8%) and primarily silicone implants (94.3%). Mean TE size was 485.4 cm(3) with mean initial fill of 245.8 cm(3) and mean final fill of 454.4 cm(3). Mean PI size was 502.9 cm(3) with a differential fill volume (PI-TE) of 11.7 cm(3). Multivariate analysis identified significant features for PI size prediction, including TE size (R(2) = 0.60; P < 0.0001) and TE final fill volume (R(2) = 0.57; P < 0.0001). The prediction expression for TE final fill and TE size was calculated as 26.6 + 0.38*(TE final fill) + 0.61*(TE size). CONCLUSIONS: TE size and final expansion volume were significant variables for implant size prediction. With prepectoral implant placement gaining popularity, the predictive formula may help optimize preoperative planning and decision-making in prepectoral reconstructions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9857536/ /pubmed/36699206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Atia, Andrew N.
Sergesketter, Amanda R.
Morris, Miranda X.
Biswas, Sonali
Zhang, Gloria
Langdell, Hannah C.
Hollins, Andrew W.
Phillips, Brett T.
Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
title Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
title_full Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
title_short Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
title_sort predicting final implant volume in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9857536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780
work_keys_str_mv AT atiaandrewn predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT sergesketteramandar predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT morrismirandax predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT biswassonali predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT zhanggloria predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT langdellhannahc predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT hollinsandreww predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction
AT phillipsbrettt predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction