Cargando…
Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9857536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780 |
_version_ | 1784873890206449664 |
---|---|
author | Atia, Andrew N. Sergesketter, Amanda R. Morris, Miranda X. Biswas, Sonali Zhang, Gloria Langdell, Hannah C. Hollins, Andrew W. Phillips, Brett T. |
author_facet | Atia, Andrew N. Sergesketter, Amanda R. Morris, Miranda X. Biswas, Sonali Zhang, Gloria Langdell, Hannah C. Hollins, Andrew W. Phillips, Brett T. |
author_sort | Atia, Andrew N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exists in prepectoral reconstruction. This study aims to identify pertinent TE characteristics and evaluate their correlations with PI size for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: This study analyzed patients who underwent two-stage prepectoral tissue expansion for breast reconstruction followed by implant placement. Patient demographics and oncologic characteristics were recorded. TE and PI features were evaluated. Significant predictors for PI volume were identified using linear and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 177 patients and 296 breast reconstructions that met inclusion criteria. All reconstructions were performed in the prepectoral plane with the majority using acellular dermal matrix (93.8%) and primarily silicone implants (94.3%). Mean TE size was 485.4 cm(3) with mean initial fill of 245.8 cm(3) and mean final fill of 454.4 cm(3). Mean PI size was 502.9 cm(3) with a differential fill volume (PI-TE) of 11.7 cm(3). Multivariate analysis identified significant features for PI size prediction, including TE size (R(2) = 0.60; P < 0.0001) and TE final fill volume (R(2) = 0.57; P < 0.0001). The prediction expression for TE final fill and TE size was calculated as 26.6 + 0.38*(TE final fill) + 0.61*(TE size). CONCLUSIONS: TE size and final expansion volume were significant variables for implant size prediction. With prepectoral implant placement gaining popularity, the predictive formula may help optimize preoperative planning and decision-making in prepectoral reconstructions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9857536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98575362023-01-24 Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Atia, Andrew N. Sergesketter, Amanda R. Morris, Miranda X. Biswas, Sonali Zhang, Gloria Langdell, Hannah C. Hollins, Andrew W. Phillips, Brett T. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction remains the most commonly performed reconstructive modality following mastectomy. Although prior studies have explored the relationship between tissue expander (TE) features and permanent implant (PI) size in subpectoral reconstruction, no such study exists in prepectoral reconstruction. This study aims to identify pertinent TE characteristics and evaluate their correlations with PI size for prepectoral implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: This study analyzed patients who underwent two-stage prepectoral tissue expansion for breast reconstruction followed by implant placement. Patient demographics and oncologic characteristics were recorded. TE and PI features were evaluated. Significant predictors for PI volume were identified using linear and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 177 patients and 296 breast reconstructions that met inclusion criteria. All reconstructions were performed in the prepectoral plane with the majority using acellular dermal matrix (93.8%) and primarily silicone implants (94.3%). Mean TE size was 485.4 cm(3) with mean initial fill of 245.8 cm(3) and mean final fill of 454.4 cm(3). Mean PI size was 502.9 cm(3) with a differential fill volume (PI-TE) of 11.7 cm(3). Multivariate analysis identified significant features for PI size prediction, including TE size (R(2) = 0.60; P < 0.0001) and TE final fill volume (R(2) = 0.57; P < 0.0001). The prediction expression for TE final fill and TE size was calculated as 26.6 + 0.38*(TE final fill) + 0.61*(TE size). CONCLUSIONS: TE size and final expansion volume were significant variables for implant size prediction. With prepectoral implant placement gaining popularity, the predictive formula may help optimize preoperative planning and decision-making in prepectoral reconstructions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9857536/ /pubmed/36699206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Atia, Andrew N. Sergesketter, Amanda R. Morris, Miranda X. Biswas, Sonali Zhang, Gloria Langdell, Hannah C. Hollins, Andrew W. Phillips, Brett T. Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction |
title | Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction |
title_full | Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction |
title_short | Predicting Final Implant Volume in Two-stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction |
title_sort | predicting final implant volume in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9857536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36699206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atiaandrewn predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT sergesketteramandar predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT morrismirandax predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT biswassonali predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT zhanggloria predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT langdellhannahc predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT hollinsandreww predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction AT phillipsbrettt predictingfinalimplantvolumeintwostageprepectoralbreastreconstruction |