Cargando…

Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review

PURPOSE: Subjectively assessing health related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents is increasingly important in the public health field. One valid and widely used generic HRQoL instrument is the KIDSCREEN questionnaire. The aim of this study was to map all studies using KIDSCREEN ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Befus, Eva-Grethe, Helseth, Sølvi, Mølland, Eirin, Westergren, Thomas, Fegran, Liv, Haraldstad, Kristin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9857919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z
_version_ 1784873968772055040
author Befus, Eva-Grethe
Helseth, Sølvi
Mølland, Eirin
Westergren, Thomas
Fegran, Liv
Haraldstad, Kristin
author_facet Befus, Eva-Grethe
Helseth, Sølvi
Mølland, Eirin
Westergren, Thomas
Fegran, Liv
Haraldstad, Kristin
author_sort Befus, Eva-Grethe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Subjectively assessing health related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents is increasingly important in the public health field. One valid and widely used generic HRQoL instrument is the KIDSCREEN questionnaire. The aim of this study was to map all studies using KIDSCREEN instruments in the general population of children and adolescents aged 6–18 years. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted. The search strategy was formulated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews guidelines. The databases Cinahl, socINDEX, Medline, Embase, APA Psychinfo, Scopus, and Eric were searched in October 2021. RESULTS: In total, 1365 papers were eligible for screening, 1031 were excluded and 334 reports were read in full. 252 reports were included. KIDSCREEN studies in the general population was predominantly conducted in Europe (n = 211). Most studies (n = 179) had a cross sectional design, while few experimental studies (n = 24) were found. The three KIDSCREEN versions comprising of 10, 27 and 52 items, were equally distributed between studies. The self-reported version (n = 225) of the KIDSCREEN instrument was more prevalent than the proxy version, while few studies discussed a cut point. Study contexts reflected international trends of public health challenges, commonly including mental- and psychosocial health, physical activity, socioeconomic status, and obesity. CONCLUSION: KIDSCREEN is widely used in cross sectional studies assessing common public health challenges. Experimental and longitudinal assessments, possibly including relevant cut offs remain mainly unexplored and are recommended for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9857919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98579192023-01-22 Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review Befus, Eva-Grethe Helseth, Sølvi Mølland, Eirin Westergren, Thomas Fegran, Liv Haraldstad, Kristin Health Qual Life Outcomes Review PURPOSE: Subjectively assessing health related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents is increasingly important in the public health field. One valid and widely used generic HRQoL instrument is the KIDSCREEN questionnaire. The aim of this study was to map all studies using KIDSCREEN instruments in the general population of children and adolescents aged 6–18 years. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted. The search strategy was formulated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews guidelines. The databases Cinahl, socINDEX, Medline, Embase, APA Psychinfo, Scopus, and Eric were searched in October 2021. RESULTS: In total, 1365 papers were eligible for screening, 1031 were excluded and 334 reports were read in full. 252 reports were included. KIDSCREEN studies in the general population was predominantly conducted in Europe (n = 211). Most studies (n = 179) had a cross sectional design, while few experimental studies (n = 24) were found. The three KIDSCREEN versions comprising of 10, 27 and 52 items, were equally distributed between studies. The self-reported version (n = 225) of the KIDSCREEN instrument was more prevalent than the proxy version, while few studies discussed a cut point. Study contexts reflected international trends of public health challenges, commonly including mental- and psychosocial health, physical activity, socioeconomic status, and obesity. CONCLUSION: KIDSCREEN is widely used in cross sectional studies assessing common public health challenges. Experimental and longitudinal assessments, possibly including relevant cut offs remain mainly unexplored and are recommended for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z. BioMed Central 2023-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9857919/ /pubmed/36670428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Befus, Eva-Grethe
Helseth, Sølvi
Mølland, Eirin
Westergren, Thomas
Fegran, Liv
Haraldstad, Kristin
Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
title Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
title_full Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
title_fullStr Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
title_short Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
title_sort use of kidscreen health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9857919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02088-z
work_keys_str_mv AT befusevagrethe useofkidscreenhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinstrumentsinthegeneralpopulationofchildrenandadolescentsascopingreview
AT helsethsølvi useofkidscreenhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinstrumentsinthegeneralpopulationofchildrenandadolescentsascopingreview
AT møllandeirin useofkidscreenhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinstrumentsinthegeneralpopulationofchildrenandadolescentsascopingreview
AT westergrenthomas useofkidscreenhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinstrumentsinthegeneralpopulationofchildrenandadolescentsascopingreview
AT fegranliv useofkidscreenhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinstrumentsinthegeneralpopulationofchildrenandadolescentsascopingreview
AT haraldstadkristin useofkidscreenhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinstrumentsinthegeneralpopulationofchildrenandadolescentsascopingreview