Cargando…
Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis
This study explores the implant-supported prosthetic treatment alternatives of the edentulous mandible from a biomechanical point of view by means of a Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Finite element (FE) models were used to simulate cases treated with six, five, and four, implants and a fixed prosthe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36661541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11010004 |
_version_ | 1784874007891279872 |
---|---|
author | Anitua, Eduardo Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra, Naiara Saracho Rotaeche, Luis |
author_facet | Anitua, Eduardo Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra, Naiara Saracho Rotaeche, Luis |
author_sort | Anitua, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study explores the implant-supported prosthetic treatment alternatives of the edentulous mandible from a biomechanical point of view by means of a Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Finite element (FE) models were used to simulate cases treated with six, five, and four, implants and a fixed prosthesis with a cantilever. In the four implant treatments, three cases were analyzed; the posterior implants were placed in axial positions, angled at 30° and 45°. Cases with six and four axially placed implants were also analyzed by placing the posterior implants distally to the foramen, thus eliminating the cantilever in the prostheses. In the cases with implants between foramina, the highest values for the principal strains and von Mises stresses were observed in the case with four implants where the posterior implants were angled at 45°. Cases with implants placed distally to the foramen and without a cantilever showed much lower bone stress and strain levels compared to cases with implants between foramina. From a biomechanical point of view, it seems to be a better option to use implants positioned distally to the foramen, eliminating cantilevers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9858073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98580732023-01-21 Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis Anitua, Eduardo Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra, Naiara Saracho Rotaeche, Luis Dent J (Basel) Article This study explores the implant-supported prosthetic treatment alternatives of the edentulous mandible from a biomechanical point of view by means of a Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Finite element (FE) models were used to simulate cases treated with six, five, and four, implants and a fixed prosthesis with a cantilever. In the four implant treatments, three cases were analyzed; the posterior implants were placed in axial positions, angled at 30° and 45°. Cases with six and four axially placed implants were also analyzed by placing the posterior implants distally to the foramen, thus eliminating the cantilever in the prostheses. In the cases with implants between foramina, the highest values for the principal strains and von Mises stresses were observed in the case with four implants where the posterior implants were angled at 45°. Cases with implants placed distally to the foramen and without a cantilever showed much lower bone stress and strain levels compared to cases with implants between foramina. From a biomechanical point of view, it seems to be a better option to use implants positioned distally to the foramen, eliminating cantilevers. MDPI 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9858073/ /pubmed/36661541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11010004 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Anitua, Eduardo Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra, Naiara Saracho Rotaeche, Luis Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis |
title | Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis |
title_full | Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis |
title_fullStr | Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis |
title_short | Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis |
title_sort | implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible: biomechanical analysis of different implant configurations via finite element analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36661541 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11010004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anituaeduardo implantsupportedprosthesesintheedentulousmandiblebiomechanicalanalysisofdifferentimplantconfigurationsviafiniteelementanalysis AT larrazabalsaezdeibarranaiara implantsupportedprosthesesintheedentulousmandiblebiomechanicalanalysisofdifferentimplantconfigurationsviafiniteelementanalysis AT sarachorotaecheluis implantsupportedprosthesesintheedentulousmandiblebiomechanicalanalysisofdifferentimplantconfigurationsviafiniteelementanalysis |