Cargando…

Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review

The inclusion of machine-learning-derived models in systematic reviews of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer is rare. Whilst such reviews have highlighted methodological issues and limited performance of the models included, it is unclear why machine-learning-derived models are absent and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burnett, Bruce, Zhou, Shang-Ming, Brophy, Sinead, Davies, Phil, Ellis, Paul, Kennedy, Jonathan, Bandyopadhyay, Amrita, Parker, Michael, Lyons, Ronan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673111
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020301
_version_ 1784874016895401984
author Burnett, Bruce
Zhou, Shang-Ming
Brophy, Sinead
Davies, Phil
Ellis, Paul
Kennedy, Jonathan
Bandyopadhyay, Amrita
Parker, Michael
Lyons, Ronan A.
author_facet Burnett, Bruce
Zhou, Shang-Ming
Brophy, Sinead
Davies, Phil
Ellis, Paul
Kennedy, Jonathan
Bandyopadhyay, Amrita
Parker, Michael
Lyons, Ronan A.
author_sort Burnett, Bruce
collection PubMed
description The inclusion of machine-learning-derived models in systematic reviews of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer is rare. Whilst such reviews have highlighted methodological issues and limited performance of the models included, it is unclear why machine-learning-derived models are absent and whether such models suffer similar methodological problems. This scoping review aims to identify machine-learning models, assess their methodology, and compare their performance with that found in previous reviews. A literature search of four databases was performed for colorectal cancer prediction and prognosis model publications that included at least one machine-learning model. A total of 14 publications were identified for inclusion in the scoping review. Data was extracted using an adapted CHARM checklist against which the models were benchmarked. The review found similar methodological problems with machine-learning models to that observed in systematic reviews for non-machine-learning models, although model performance was better. The inclusion of machine-learning models in systematic reviews is required, as they offer improved performance despite similar methodological omissions; however, to achieve this the methodological issues that affect many prediction models need to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9858109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98581092023-01-21 Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review Burnett, Bruce Zhou, Shang-Ming Brophy, Sinead Davies, Phil Ellis, Paul Kennedy, Jonathan Bandyopadhyay, Amrita Parker, Michael Lyons, Ronan A. Diagnostics (Basel) Review The inclusion of machine-learning-derived models in systematic reviews of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer is rare. Whilst such reviews have highlighted methodological issues and limited performance of the models included, it is unclear why machine-learning-derived models are absent and whether such models suffer similar methodological problems. This scoping review aims to identify machine-learning models, assess their methodology, and compare their performance with that found in previous reviews. A literature search of four databases was performed for colorectal cancer prediction and prognosis model publications that included at least one machine-learning model. A total of 14 publications were identified for inclusion in the scoping review. Data was extracted using an adapted CHARM checklist against which the models were benchmarked. The review found similar methodological problems with machine-learning models to that observed in systematic reviews for non-machine-learning models, although model performance was better. The inclusion of machine-learning models in systematic reviews is required, as they offer improved performance despite similar methodological omissions; however, to achieve this the methodological issues that affect many prediction models need to be addressed. MDPI 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9858109/ /pubmed/36673111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020301 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Burnett, Bruce
Zhou, Shang-Ming
Brophy, Sinead
Davies, Phil
Ellis, Paul
Kennedy, Jonathan
Bandyopadhyay, Amrita
Parker, Michael
Lyons, Ronan A.
Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
title Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
title_full Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
title_fullStr Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
title_short Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
title_sort machine learning in colorectal cancer risk prediction from routinely collected data: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673111
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020301
work_keys_str_mv AT burnettbruce machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT zhoushangming machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT brophysinead machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT daviesphil machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT ellispaul machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT kennedyjonathan machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT bandyopadhyayamrita machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT parkermichael machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview
AT lyonsronana machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview