Cargando…
Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review
The inclusion of machine-learning-derived models in systematic reviews of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer is rare. Whilst such reviews have highlighted methodological issues and limited performance of the models included, it is unclear why machine-learning-derived models are absent and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020301 |
_version_ | 1784874016895401984 |
---|---|
author | Burnett, Bruce Zhou, Shang-Ming Brophy, Sinead Davies, Phil Ellis, Paul Kennedy, Jonathan Bandyopadhyay, Amrita Parker, Michael Lyons, Ronan A. |
author_facet | Burnett, Bruce Zhou, Shang-Ming Brophy, Sinead Davies, Phil Ellis, Paul Kennedy, Jonathan Bandyopadhyay, Amrita Parker, Michael Lyons, Ronan A. |
author_sort | Burnett, Bruce |
collection | PubMed |
description | The inclusion of machine-learning-derived models in systematic reviews of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer is rare. Whilst such reviews have highlighted methodological issues and limited performance of the models included, it is unclear why machine-learning-derived models are absent and whether such models suffer similar methodological problems. This scoping review aims to identify machine-learning models, assess their methodology, and compare their performance with that found in previous reviews. A literature search of four databases was performed for colorectal cancer prediction and prognosis model publications that included at least one machine-learning model. A total of 14 publications were identified for inclusion in the scoping review. Data was extracted using an adapted CHARM checklist against which the models were benchmarked. The review found similar methodological problems with machine-learning models to that observed in systematic reviews for non-machine-learning models, although model performance was better. The inclusion of machine-learning models in systematic reviews is required, as they offer improved performance despite similar methodological omissions; however, to achieve this the methodological issues that affect many prediction models need to be addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9858109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98581092023-01-21 Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review Burnett, Bruce Zhou, Shang-Ming Brophy, Sinead Davies, Phil Ellis, Paul Kennedy, Jonathan Bandyopadhyay, Amrita Parker, Michael Lyons, Ronan A. Diagnostics (Basel) Review The inclusion of machine-learning-derived models in systematic reviews of risk prediction models for colorectal cancer is rare. Whilst such reviews have highlighted methodological issues and limited performance of the models included, it is unclear why machine-learning-derived models are absent and whether such models suffer similar methodological problems. This scoping review aims to identify machine-learning models, assess their methodology, and compare their performance with that found in previous reviews. A literature search of four databases was performed for colorectal cancer prediction and prognosis model publications that included at least one machine-learning model. A total of 14 publications were identified for inclusion in the scoping review. Data was extracted using an adapted CHARM checklist against which the models were benchmarked. The review found similar methodological problems with machine-learning models to that observed in systematic reviews for non-machine-learning models, although model performance was better. The inclusion of machine-learning models in systematic reviews is required, as they offer improved performance despite similar methodological omissions; however, to achieve this the methodological issues that affect many prediction models need to be addressed. MDPI 2023-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9858109/ /pubmed/36673111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020301 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Burnett, Bruce Zhou, Shang-Ming Brophy, Sinead Davies, Phil Ellis, Paul Kennedy, Jonathan Bandyopadhyay, Amrita Parker, Michael Lyons, Ronan A. Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review |
title | Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review |
title_full | Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review |
title_short | Machine Learning in Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction from Routinely Collected Data: A Review |
title_sort | machine learning in colorectal cancer risk prediction from routinely collected data: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020301 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burnettbruce machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT zhoushangming machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT brophysinead machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT daviesphil machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT ellispaul machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT kennedyjonathan machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT bandyopadhyayamrita machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT parkermichael machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview AT lyonsronana machinelearningincolorectalcancerriskpredictionfromroutinelycollecteddataareview |