Cargando…

Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks

Extracting ursolic acid (UA) from plant resources using organic solvents is incompatible with food applications. To address this, in this study, 15 edible hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents (HDESs) were prepared to extract UA from apple peel, the extraction conditions were optimized, and the optimiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Haiyan, Liu, Yugang, Guo, Shiyin, Shi, Meng, Qin, Si, Zeng, Chaoxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12020310
_version_ 1784874070647504896
author Li, Haiyan
Liu, Yugang
Guo, Shiyin
Shi, Meng
Qin, Si
Zeng, Chaoxi
author_facet Li, Haiyan
Liu, Yugang
Guo, Shiyin
Shi, Meng
Qin, Si
Zeng, Chaoxi
author_sort Li, Haiyan
collection PubMed
description Extracting ursolic acid (UA) from plant resources using organic solvents is incompatible with food applications. To address this, in this study, 15 edible hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents (HDESs) were prepared to extract UA from apple peel, the extraction conditions were optimized, and the optimization strategies were compared. It was found that the solubility of UA in the HDESs can be 9 times higher than the traditional solvent such as ethanol. The response surface optimization concluded that temperature had the greatest effect on the extraction and the optimized test conditions obtained as follows: temperature of 49 °C, time of 32 min, solid–liquid ratio of 1:16.5 g/mL, respectively. Comparing the response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN), it was concluded that ANN has more accurate prediction ability than RSM. Overall, the HDESs are more effective and environmentally friendly than conventional organic solvents to extract UA. The results of this study will facilitate the further exploration of HDES in various food and pharmaceutical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9858320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98583202023-01-21 Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks Li, Haiyan Liu, Yugang Guo, Shiyin Shi, Meng Qin, Si Zeng, Chaoxi Foods Article Extracting ursolic acid (UA) from plant resources using organic solvents is incompatible with food applications. To address this, in this study, 15 edible hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents (HDESs) were prepared to extract UA from apple peel, the extraction conditions were optimized, and the optimization strategies were compared. It was found that the solubility of UA in the HDESs can be 9 times higher than the traditional solvent such as ethanol. The response surface optimization concluded that temperature had the greatest effect on the extraction and the optimized test conditions obtained as follows: temperature of 49 °C, time of 32 min, solid–liquid ratio of 1:16.5 g/mL, respectively. Comparing the response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN), it was concluded that ANN has more accurate prediction ability than RSM. Overall, the HDESs are more effective and environmentally friendly than conventional organic solvents to extract UA. The results of this study will facilitate the further exploration of HDES in various food and pharmaceutical applications. MDPI 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9858320/ /pubmed/36673401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12020310 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Haiyan
Liu, Yugang
Guo, Shiyin
Shi, Meng
Qin, Si
Zeng, Chaoxi
Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
title Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
title_full Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
title_fullStr Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
title_short Extraction of Ursolic Acid from Apple Peel with Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvents: Comparison between Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Networks
title_sort extraction of ursolic acid from apple peel with hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents: comparison between response surface methodology and artificial neural networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12020310
work_keys_str_mv AT lihaiyan extractionofursolicacidfromapplepeelwithhydrophobicdeepeutecticsolventscomparisonbetweenresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworks
AT liuyugang extractionofursolicacidfromapplepeelwithhydrophobicdeepeutecticsolventscomparisonbetweenresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworks
AT guoshiyin extractionofursolicacidfromapplepeelwithhydrophobicdeepeutecticsolventscomparisonbetweenresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworks
AT shimeng extractionofursolicacidfromapplepeelwithhydrophobicdeepeutecticsolventscomparisonbetweenresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworks
AT qinsi extractionofursolicacidfromapplepeelwithhydrophobicdeepeutecticsolventscomparisonbetweenresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworks
AT zengchaoxi extractionofursolicacidfromapplepeelwithhydrophobicdeepeutecticsolventscomparisonbetweenresponsesurfacemethodologyandartificialneuralnetworks