Cargando…

The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This study aimed to determine whether transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before labor induction can predict successful induction. This retrospective study recruited 138 pregnant women who underwent labor induction at 37–41 weeks of gestation. Cervical length was measured using t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Pei-Chen, Tsui, Wing Lam, Ding, Dah-Ching
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673893
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021138
_version_ 1784874337207058432
author Li, Pei-Chen
Tsui, Wing Lam
Ding, Dah-Ching
author_facet Li, Pei-Chen
Tsui, Wing Lam
Ding, Dah-Ching
author_sort Li, Pei-Chen
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine whether transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before labor induction can predict successful induction. This retrospective study recruited 138 pregnant women who underwent labor induction at 37–41 weeks of gestation. Cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography before labor induction. Labor was induced according to the hospital protocol. Age, gestational age (GA), parity, body mass index (BMI), Bishop score, hemoglobin level, maternal disease, and epidural anesthesia were also recorded. Labor induction outcomes, including cesarean section for failed induction, time of induction, and the three labor stages, were assessed. From December 2018 to December 2021, 138 women were recruited for our study, including 120 and 18 women with successful and failed labor induction, respectively. Shorter cervical length (≤3.415 cm, OR = 6.22, 95% CI = 1.75–22.15) and multiparity (OR = 17.69, 95% CI = 2.94–106.51) were associated with successful induction. Higher BMI was associated with failed induction (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.75–0.99). Age, GA, Bishop score, and fetal birth weight were not associated with successful labor induction. The ROC curve showed a cervical length cutoff value of 3.415 cm, revealing 76.8% of the area under the curve. In conclusion, a shorter cervical length (≤3.415 cm) was associated with a higher chance of successful labor induction (76.8%). This parameter might be used to predict the chance of successful labor induction. This information could help better inform clinician discussions with pregnant women concerning the chance of successful labor induction and consequent decision-making. Nevertheless, further large-scale clinical trials are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9859365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98593652023-01-21 The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study Li, Pei-Chen Tsui, Wing Lam Ding, Dah-Ching Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study aimed to determine whether transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before labor induction can predict successful induction. This retrospective study recruited 138 pregnant women who underwent labor induction at 37–41 weeks of gestation. Cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasonography before labor induction. Labor was induced according to the hospital protocol. Age, gestational age (GA), parity, body mass index (BMI), Bishop score, hemoglobin level, maternal disease, and epidural anesthesia were also recorded. Labor induction outcomes, including cesarean section for failed induction, time of induction, and the three labor stages, were assessed. From December 2018 to December 2021, 138 women were recruited for our study, including 120 and 18 women with successful and failed labor induction, respectively. Shorter cervical length (≤3.415 cm, OR = 6.22, 95% CI = 1.75–22.15) and multiparity (OR = 17.69, 95% CI = 2.94–106.51) were associated with successful induction. Higher BMI was associated with failed induction (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.75–0.99). Age, GA, Bishop score, and fetal birth weight were not associated with successful labor induction. The ROC curve showed a cervical length cutoff value of 3.415 cm, revealing 76.8% of the area under the curve. In conclusion, a shorter cervical length (≤3.415 cm) was associated with a higher chance of successful labor induction (76.8%). This parameter might be used to predict the chance of successful labor induction. This information could help better inform clinician discussions with pregnant women concerning the chance of successful labor induction and consequent decision-making. Nevertheless, further large-scale clinical trials are warranted. MDPI 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9859365/ /pubmed/36673893 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021138 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Pei-Chen
Tsui, Wing Lam
Ding, Dah-Ching
The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort association between cervical length and successful labor induction: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9859365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36673893
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021138
work_keys_str_mv AT lipeichen theassociationbetweencervicallengthandsuccessfullaborinductionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tsuiwinglam theassociationbetweencervicallengthandsuccessfullaborinductionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dingdahching theassociationbetweencervicallengthandsuccessfullaborinductionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lipeichen associationbetweencervicallengthandsuccessfullaborinductionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tsuiwinglam associationbetweencervicallengthandsuccessfullaborinductionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dingdahching associationbetweencervicallengthandsuccessfullaborinductionaretrospectivecohortstudy